Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The FBI Robs a Bank
Well, not technically a bank, but the utter lack of principle is the same. US Private Vaults was a private safety deposit box business in Beverly Hills, CA. An FBI agent “suspected” that its owners were involved in laundering drug money (an allegation that was never proven in court, by the way). On that basis, the FBI moved in and seized every lockbox on the site – most of which belonged to people who were not dealing drugs or laundering drug money.
Agents took photos and videos of pay stubs, password lists, credit cards, a prenuptial agreement, immigration and vaccination records, bank statements, heirlooms and a will, court records show. In one box, agents found cremated human remains.
Eighteen months later, newly unsealed court documents show that the FBI and U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles got their warrant for that raid by misleading the judge who approved it.
They got the warrant, but they never told the judge they planned to confiscate everything under our gangster Government’s corrupt asset forfeiture laws. And as is usual with the thoroughly corrupt FBI, they are refusing to release to the public the papers they filed with the court before they raided the operation; which seems to be standard procedure for Merrick Garland’s DOJ.
The U.S. attorney’s office has tried to block public disclosure of court papers that laid bare the government’s deception, but a judge rejected its request to keep them under seal.
The FBI’s take amounted to some $86 million dollars. When some of the depositors asked for their possessions back, the FBI threatened to charge them with crimes. Most people gave up rather than spend tens of thousands of dollars and fighting in court for years to get their stuff back. David French calls spending tens of thousands of dollars in court to have your rights returned a “blessing of liberty.” I call it Gangster Government.
Published in General
Yep
https://ricochet.com/1316528/the-fbi-is-totally-corrupt/
Nice video on it.
Is there no end to their defiance and corruption? I’m really getting scared. . .
Does not appear to be.
It is clear, at the agent level, they relish this stuuff.
When we are all switched to FedCoin™ the Fibbies will be all to seize all those assets from the comfort of their desk chairs. Won’t that be convenient for them.
By what twisted logic does the FBI think that it becoming the enemy of the people is a good idea?
Obviously, the FBI et al figure that it’s the people who should fear becoming the enemy of the FBI.
Logic? This is one of those “Why does a dog lick it’s ____?“ Because it can.
That part of the Power organism hopes to be a survivor after the final Transformation is complete – if they just play along now they will still have a spot in the hierarchy. After all – totalitarians always need lower level thugs. People can always be persuaded to squeal on their neighbors.
Have any of the Republican mice in Congress had anything to squeak about this?
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again, the FBI does not solve crimes – they manage them.
Where they aren’t actually committing them.
Not if they don’t want to be targeted themselves.
I understand from an old British retired military and civil service friend that after the Second World War it became a thing in the U.K. for affluent (i.e. rich) people to hide a portion of their wealth in bank safe deposit boxes, so they could declared their taxable worth at a lower rate than it actually was. I understand that this became such a thing that a “black market” sprung up where otherwise taxable assists were converted to items such as cash, art work, documents, valuable antiques, precious stones and metals, etc. – to be stored in a bank that you only have access to and not the government. Anyway, these “items” could then be “bartered” between individuals for other assists and kept it “off the books” as it were.
This became such a practice that by the end of the 1960s both the affluent and not-so-affluent (to include some members of royalty) were hiding documents (think blackmail) and hording wealth as a way to protect it from the government. There is a rather good crime noir film (supposedly based on true events) from 2008 call “The Bank Job,” starring Jason Statham whose plot is based on – you guessed it – a bank vault safety box robbery to steal these hidden assist. The kick is, the British Government may have had a hand it this (wink-wink, nudge-nudge, you know what I mean) to retrieve certain item(s). Who needs Jeffry Epstein to gather your dirt when you can just walk in and get it yourself?
I think that Garland and Wray are wrecking any presumption of good faith and professionalism of federal law enforcement.
Not only was there no discharge of a legal duty to demonstrate illegal activity to justify a civil forfeiture (there is no criminal forfeiture here) but due process has been denied to the innocent by refusing to provide very basic information.
Federal judges need to reclaim their authority and start issuing fines, jail time and lost law licenses for this kind of lawlessness.
The LA Times article is very detailed and unsympathetic to the feds.
There’s some scenes in the live-action Thunderbirds movie that seem related.
The judge, having learned that the FBI has taken possession of items not authorized by the warrant under the guise of executing the warrant, should order the immediate return of all such material to its rightful owners, and should bar any of it from use as evidence. That he has not done so makes the judge equally culpable in this illegal taking.
The judge, the agents involved, and their superiors who authorized the search should all be held personally liable. No claim of sovereign immunity should be considered, since the taking was in violation of the law.
One thing I noticed in the earlier stories/videos was that the warrant precluded searching through the boxes etc for CRIMINAL prosecution/forfeiture. But they’ve been trying to do CIVIL forfeiture.
But even civil forfeiture requires a showing of criminal activity. The notion that my box is government property because another box in the vault was used by a suspected criminal is preposterous.
No it does not.
CAF does not require you to be showing any criminal activity.
Civil forfeiture still has to have some connection to unlawful behavior. If the feds come and take your car, they needed to tell whoever issued the warrant that it was used in or purchased from the proceeds from something unlawful even if not done by you.
You are right that criminal forfeiture is only of stuff owned by the person charged so a criminal charge/prosecution is required whereas civil does not require a charge or conviction just an alleged connection to something criminal.
Now, it is out of control. Civil forfeiture has become a big middle finger at the Fourth and Fifth Amendment. We desperately need reform.
From what I understand, civil forfeiture only has to be presumed to have been part of some illegal process, and that can exist only in the mind of the officer, without any evidence whatsoever. $2,000 in cash in the possession of a tourist? It’s presumed it must be illegal, and it gets taken.
No it does not. They can declare that your money is guilty and sue us to get it back.
It is wrong and always has been, and anyone supporting it is a threat to liberty.
Yes.
Pretty much the treatment tourists get in the 3rd world.
Steve Lehto does occasional videos on Civil Asset Forfeiture too.
Snowden’s secret.
Oh, that’s easy. They think they’re going to win.
So, are there any Republicans in Congress with the ***** to take on the FBI? Especially after this?
That LA Times story is on point.