The Truth Is Really Important in Our Lives

 

I grew up amid the major threat of Communism being part of American life. It was always only a threat until recent years when it has actually manifested its influence in our daily life. I’ve been trying to understand what we are seeing and how we have arrived here.

Until the last few years,  I had recognized Communism as an oppressive governmental approach to organizing society. I had thought the principal tool for regimes to get there was the use of police and military power. Communist propaganda techniques were always part of the discussions but I, not having any expertise in public media or communications, never really understood the important role that plays in capturing the people. The last nine years on Ricochet has been an education in this for me.

We are now in a decisive battle for the preservation of the republic that America’s Founders handed us, documented by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution amended with the Bill of Rights.

The Democrats, Progressives, and Communists, many of whom fit all three of those descriptors, have been working for more than a century towards the end of making America collectivist and part of a venture to establish a global collectivist society. A very big element in this conquest venture is that propaganda activity I mentioned that I didn’t really understand in depth. I think I’m seeing that better now that we are right in the middle of the process.

The lies and deceptions are never-ending. Facts and Truth are absent. Public education, advanced academia, public media, and government all act in concert to spread the message of largely false propaganda. As we witnessed during the Covid pandemic for the medical profession, almost all traditional institutions have been corrupted and no longer present a truthful picture of their represented field. Among these are corporate business, education, banking, housing, energy, healthcare, and it goes on and on with little truthful information being presented.

There are many essays appearing regularly here on Ricochet revealing what is happening in America.

I hope and pray we are attentive and ready to go to work to save America.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 44 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Central planning with the tax code adds negative value. All of it is communist Rube Goldberg nonsense.

    • #31
  2. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson: I had recognized Communism as an oppressive governmental approach to organizing society. I had thought the principal tool for regimes to get there was the use of police and military power. Communist propaganda techniques were always part of the discussions but I, not having any expertise in public media or communications, never really understood the important role that plays in capturing the people.

    This would seem to be the appropriate time and place for the classic Theodore Dalrymple (aka Anthony Daniels) quote from 17 years ago:

    Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

    Bob Thompson: We are now in a decisive battle for the preservation of the republic that America’s Founders handed us, documented by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution amended with the Bill of Rights.

    It is way too late for that. That battle has been raging for decades and it’s pretty-much lost. There have been lots of amendments after the Bill of Rights, not all of them so great. About 100 years ago there was still a chance to turn the tide. This century’s roaring twenties will roar in a way quite different from the last century’s but like the 1920s, they will end in tears.

    I don’t disagree with what you have said here. Perhaps the battle now is just for Truth.

    You do know that most people like Truth and wealth and the flag.

    What does wealth and the flag have to do with knowledge? I have an appreciation for one national flag, the Stars and Stripes or Old Glory, as it stands for individual freedom. Most people do like to avoid what we call poverty if that is what you mean about liking wealth.

    • #32
  3. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Central planning with the tax code adds negative value. All of it is communist Rube Goldberg nonsense.

    Many moves facilitating centralization occurred between 1865 and 1910. The 16th and 17th Amendments sealed the deal, the 16th having the worst destructive effect on the original intent of the Constitution.

    • #33
  4. drlorentz Member
    drlorentz
    @drlorentz

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson: I had recognized Communism as an oppressive governmental approach to organizing society. I had thought the principal tool for regimes to get there was the use of police and military power. Communist propaganda techniques were always part of the discussions but I, not having any expertise in public media or communications, never really understood the important role that plays in capturing the people.

    This would seem to be the appropriate time and place for the classic Theodore Dalrymple (aka Anthony Daniels) quote from 17 years ago:

    Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

    Bob Thompson: We are now in a decisive battle for the preservation of the republic that America’s Founders handed us, documented by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution amended with the Bill of Rights.

    It is way too late for that. That battle has been raging for decades and it’s pretty-much lost. There have been lots of amendments after the Bill of Rights, not all of them so great. About 100 years ago there was still a chance to turn the tide. This century’s roaring twenties will roar in a way quite different from the last century’s but like the 1920s, they will end in tears.

    I don’t disagree with what you have said here. Perhaps the battle now is just for Truth.

    It is still worth fighting for truth, all the way to the bitter end. If nothing else, I believe hewing to the truth results in a more satisfying life, albeit perhaps a more difficult one. Sadly, all institutions in the West have been corrupted by the kinds of lies Dalrymple identified many years ago. Even my own profession, which once prided itself on the search for truth, has fallen prey to this corruption. It’s gone from “let the chips fall where they may” to “the chips had better fall here or else.”

    • #34
  5. drlorentz Member
    drlorentz
    @drlorentz

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    You do know that most people like Truth and wealth and the flag. 

    Most people decidedly do not like truth; they prefer comforting myths and lies. As for the flag, I’m not so sure about that either. Furthermore, most of the flag-waving one sees now is done by the regime as a way to attack or intimidate their political enemies. Witness all the loose talk of “defending our democracy” from the evil right-wingers. 

    The poet A. E. Housman had the following to say about the truth: “The faintest of all human passions is the love of truth.”

    • #35
  6. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    You do know that most people like Truth and wealth and the flag.

    Most people decidedly do not like truth; they prefer comforting myths and lies. As for the flag, I’m not so sure about that either. Furthermore, most of the flag-waving one sees now is done by the regime as a way to attack or intimidate their political enemies. Witness all the loose talk of “defending our democracy” from the evil right-wingers.

    The poet A. E. Housman had the following to say about the truth: “The faintest of all human passions is the love of truth.”

    I was thinking it’s more like a quaint fondness for its memory, in principle.

    • #36
  7. drlorentz Member
    drlorentz
    @drlorentz

    Flicker (View Comment):

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    You do know that most people like Truth and wealth and the flag.

    Most people decidedly do not like truth; they prefer comforting myths and lies. As for the flag, I’m not so sure about that either. Furthermore, most of the flag-waving one sees now is done by the regime as a way to attack or intimidate their political enemies. Witness all the loose talk of “defending our democracy” from the evil right-wingers.

    The poet A. E. Housman had the following to say about the truth: “The faintest of all human passions is the love of truth.”

    I was thinking it’s more like a quaint fondness for its memory, in principle.

    This discussion brings to mind Derb’s insight:

    The ordinary modes of human thinking are magical, religious, social, and personal. We want our wishes to come true; we want the universe to care about us; we want the approval of those around us; we want to get even with that s.o.b who insulted us at the last tribal council. For most people, wanting to know the cold truth about the world is way, way down the list.

    • #37
  8. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    This discussion brings to mind Derb’s insight:

    The ordinary modes of human thinking are magical, religious, social, and personal. We want our wishes to come true; we want the universe to care about us; we want the approval of those around us; we want to get even with that s.o.b who insulted us at the last tribal council. For most people, wanting to know the cold truth about the world is way, way down the list.

    The more I think I know, the more I think I don’t know.  So, more and more lately, when the rational doesn’t make any sense, the more I tend to accept the magical, religious, social, and personal as valid.

    And maybe in the end this is the cold hard truth.

    And come to think of it, this fits with Desmet’s ordering of human thinking, even for the deliberately and devoutly rational.

    • #38
  9. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    MarciN (View Comment):

    My husband and I watched an extremely sad movie last night: Mr. Jones. It was released in 2019, and it is on Amazon Prime.

    It’s about the Holodomor and Walter Duranty and the New York Times.

    But it’s really about big government everywhere.

    I saw that when it came out.  I’m not sure how I heard about it, probably someone here mentioned it.  It was very well done and a surprising condemnation of the NYT.

    • #39
  10. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Some may like this. Most of you will think it’s nuts. lol

    This is actually existing postmodernism, because it breaks with the constitutional state: the mission of the latter is the protection of defence rights against unsolicited external interference in the freedom to determine oneself how to conduct one’s life. The welfare state, by contrast, is held together by granting entitlement rights to all sorts of benefits; that is, rights to benefits that don’t originate in private law contracts among individuals for the exchange of goods and services. 

    Consequently, these entitlement rights are enforced by the state power. Their fulfilment eventually becomes dependent on the unlimited creation of fiat money. However, as long as this is limited to panem et circensis – the welfare state and its orchestration in the media – the interference with the private sphere of people and their ways of conducting their lives is limited. There is no collective, common good conceived here that is imposed on all.

     

    A first aspect that marks the present regime as specifically postmodern is its construction of a postfactual reality that is imposed on all.

     

    The mechanism that seduced many academics that have no sympathy with intellectual postmodernism is this one: it is suggested that by pursuing one’s normal, everyday course of life, one endangers the well-being of others. Every form of physical contact can contribute to the spread of the coronavirus. Every activity has an impact on the non-human environment that can contribute to life threatening climate change. 

     

    Once again, we need the courage to use reason as a means to limit power. The concentration of power is an evil in itself. It leads to abuse. It is an illusion to think that there could be a good state endowed with coercive power that could regulate society in the sense of “social justice” through redistributing wealth (the welfare state with its dependence on fiat money) or, even worse, implementing a common good through the regulation of the lives of people. The way back to freedom is to free ourselves from this illusion.

     

    “Have the courage to use your own mind!” is the motto of the Enlightenment according to Kant. If enough people muster again this courage, we will return to the path that leads to peaceful coexistence, to technological and economic progress and with it to more quality of life and opportunities for the development of a self-determined life for all: this is the path of fact-based science and a constitutional state that safeguards the fundamental rights of each individual person.

    https://brownstone.org/articles/fiat-money-and-the-covid-regime-actually-existing-postmodernism/?utm_medium=onesignal&utm_source=push

     

     

     

     

     

    • #40
  11. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Moderator Note:

    Tone it down, Henry.

    Flicker (View Comment):The more I think I know, the more I think I don’t know.  So, more and more lately, when the rational doesn’t make any sense, the more I tend to accept the magical, religious, social, and personal as valid.

    I find your statement [redacted]

    • #41
  12. TeamAmerica Member
    TeamAmerica
    @TeamAmerica

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Until the last few years, I had recognized Communism as an oppressive governmental approach to organizing society. I had thought the principal tool for regimes to get there was the use of police and military power. Communist propaganda techniques were always part of the discussions but I, not having any expertise in public media or communications, never really understood the important role that plays in capturing the people. The last nine years on Ricochet has been an education in this for me.

    The three books that help explain this are in order of Chronology,

    Fools, Frauds and Firebrands by Roger Scruton.

    The Devil’s Pleasure Palace by Michael Walsh

    The War on the West by Douglass Murray.

    I am not a big fan of The Devil’s Pleasure Palace because Matt Walsh talks about Catholicism like everyone should automatically relate to it. It’s like how I talk about genetic engineering. Also, I don’t think he is as good a writer as the other two.

    However, I must say that The Devil’s Pleasure Palace is the most relevant to Mr. Thompson’s question as it involves American culture as well as the American Academia.

    To summarize over five hundred pages, when ideas don’t work and make people miserable they go to the Academia to slowly fester until they can infect the body politic.

     

    Misthiocracy (is he still active here?) pointed out that the real inspiration for the left’s takeover of almost all our institutions was the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci. He proposed that organizing the peasants or factory workers was the wrong approach to creating a Marxist utopia, and argued that the focus should be on taking over what Lenin termed the commanding heights of a culture- the public schools, the universities, the news media, the gov’t bureaucracies and the entertainment business. all of which, excepting some universities like Hillsdale, Fox News, and talk radio, has been accomplished.

    As people like Ben Shapiro and Tim Pool attempt to create alternatives to legacy/leftist media, watch those 87k new IRS agents use an expensive, lengthy auditing hell to try and weaken or destroy them.

    Another book anticipating and describing the corruption of our universities was 1988’s ‘The  Closing of the American Mind’ by Univ. of Pennsylvania Professor Alan Bloom. I gather it described how leftist dogma taught as virtual religion replaced the  Enlightenment values of tolerance.

    Prof. Camille Paglia, a feminist, lesbian and Bernie Sanders supporter described the consequences in a YT video a couple of years ago “Our universities are a mess. When I meet young people who have recently graduated from elite universities, they don’t know anything, but their heads are full of ideology.”

    • #42
  13. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    TeamAmerica (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Until the last few years, I had recognized Communism as an oppressive governmental approach to organizing society. I had thought the principal tool for regimes to get there was the use of police and military power. Communist propaganda techniques were always part of the discussions but I, not having any expertise in public media or communications, never really understood the important role that plays in capturing the people. The last nine years on Ricochet has been an education in this for me.

    The three books that help explain this are in order of Chronology,

    Fools, Frauds and Firebrands by Roger Scruton.

    The Devil’s Pleasure Palace by Michael Walsh

    The War on the West by Douglass Murray.

    I am not a big fan of The Devil’s Pleasure Palace because Matt Walsh talks about Catholicism like everyone should automatically relate to it. It’s like how I talk about genetic engineering. Also, I don’t think he is as good a writer as the other two.

    However, I must say that The Devil’s Pleasure Palace is the most relevant to Mr. Thompson’s question as it involves American culture as well as the American Academia.

    To summarize over five hundred pages, when ideas don’t work and make people miserable they go to the Academia to slowly fester until they can infect the body politic.

     

    Misthiocracy (is he still active here?) pointed out that the real inspiration for the left’s takeover of almost all our institutions was the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci. He proposed that organizing the peasants or factory workers was the wrong approach to creating a Marxist utopia, and argued that the focus should be on taking over what Lenin termed the commanding heights of a culture- the public schools, the universities, the news media, the gov’t bureaucracies and the entertainment business. all of which, excepting some universities like Hillsdale, Fox News, and talk radio, has been accomplished.

    As people like Ben Shapiro and Tim Pool attempt to create alternatives to legacy/leftist media, watch those 87k new IRS agents use an expensive, lengthy auditing hell to try and weaken or destroy them.

    Another book anticipating and describing the corruption of our universities was 1988’s ‘The Closing of the American Mind’ by Univ. of Pennsylvania Professor Alan Bloom. I gather it described how leftist dogma taught as virtual religion replaced the Enlightenment values of tolerance.

    Prof. Camille Paglia, a feminist, lesbian and Bernie Sanders supporter described the consequencesG in a YT video a couple of years ago “Our universities are a mess. When I meet young people who have recently graduated from elite universities, they don’t know anything, but their heads are full of ideology.”

    I wrote a review of, God and Man at Yale. The Closing of the American Mind is just too overwrought and fancy for my taste. The Brother’s Karamazov better describes why intellectuals have so much beef with G-d. 

    • #43
  14. TeamAmerica Member
    TeamAmerica
    @TeamAmerica

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson: I had recognized Communism as an oppressive governmental approach to organizing society. I had thought the principal tool for regimes to get there was the use of police and military power. Communist propaganda techniques were always part of the discussions but I, not having any expertise in public media or communications, never really understood the important role that plays in capturing the people.

    This would seem to be the appropriate time and place for the classic Theodore Dalrymple (aka Anthony Daniels) quote from 17 years ago:

    Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

    Bob Thompson: We are now in a decisive battle for the preservation of the republic that America’s Founders handed us, documented by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution amended with the Bill of Rights.

    It is way too late for that. That battle has been raging for decades and it’s pretty-much lost. There have been lots of amendments after the Bill of Rights, not all of them so great. About 100 years ago there was still a chance to turn the tide. This century’s roaring twenties will roar in a way quite different from the last century’s but like the 1920s, they will end in tears.

    Eh, maybe. But the internet may offer a means to fight back. I’m not a fan, but Joe Rogan’s podcasts have far more viewers, iirc, than most CNN or MSNBC shows. 

    • #44
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.