A House Ignited: Chancellor Biden’s pre-Enabling Act Speech

 

I just watched this appalling speech (via C-SPAN’s YouTube) from Biden. There’s the blood-red, the Marines at parade rest, the only crowd he’s ever drawn who weren’t required to be there by the Constitution itself…

It’s chock full of divisive, angry, focused rhetoric that should be sufficient to get the next Civil War underway, but there’s plenty of a different whiff about it. This awful speech is long on Hitler Enabling Act resonance, and justification of future actions.  This speech doesn’t do anything on its own, of course — instead, it prepares the battlefield for what is to come.  Along the way,  he (I mean they) provide reassurance to their tech-fascist partners that continued persecution of political opposition will still be green-lit.

People ask what the purpose and the method is for this speech.  I think it’s to provide a whole raft of language to the administration’s agents throughout industry, media, and in their terror wings as well (Antifa, BLM, whatever’s left of Occupy, and the school boards’ enforcers).  The speech in itself does nothing.  It’s not actually an Enabling Act speech, but can be a precursor.  What it absolutely does is enable others to exercise special “emergency” powers, but without formal justification.

The focus on elections in the speech is further instruction to the administration’s fascist partners as to the goal they must support using their powers.  They are being instructed to use the phrasing in the speech to suppress any discussion about election integrity which does not parrot the Party Line — Orange Goldstein bad.

This is a surprisingly subtle speech.  The read meat is bizarre.  The real protein is in the subtext.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 124 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    • #61
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    If you can’t agree that the great majority of protesters actually at the Capitol were peaceful, and if you can’t agree that there were any federal agents, agents provocateurs, or professional agitators because the government declines to say so, you are missing 100% of the known facts presented on the internet, including videos, FBI documents and images, and eye witness accounts (including by experienced riot and protest reporters).

    There are 14,000 hours of video covering the “insurrection”. Why do we only see a sliver of all that?

    The cameras weren’t turned on? And then the tapes were blank. And then they were accidentally erased. And no they can’t find them. I think that’s the official story.

    And Epstine didn’t kill himself.

    Well, the cameras sure don’t show him killing himself.

    • #62
  3. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    BDB (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    They should have waited for the Reichstag to burn down.

    The flares have already been lit.

     

    Hard to tell, but I think they’re trying to get two years flame from the horrible, no-good, very bad J6. Or maybe the next one is right around the corner. These days it’s like there’s a Reichstagbucks at every stoplight.

    They are primed and ready to go when the next George Floyd happens.

    • #63
  4. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    Do you ever get the feeling, that the leftists read dystopian fiction up side down (or backwards) ? All the villains are heroes – all the evil acts are for a good cause…. 1984 was read as a manual, and V for Vendetta as a style guide?

    • #64
  5. 1787Libertarian Member
    1787Libertarian
    @

    For the kids who don’t quite know the great reference from earlier.

    • #65
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    They should have waited for the Reichstag to burn down.

    The flares have already been lit.

     

    Hard to tell, but I think they’re trying to get two years flame from the horrible, no-good, very bad J6. Or maybe the next one is right around the corner. These days it’s like there’s a Reichstagbucks at every stoplight.

    They are primed and ready to go when the next George Floyd happens.

    And if it doesn’t happen soon enough to suit them, they can always cause it themselves.

     

    • #66
  7. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    They should have waited for the Reichstag to burn down.

    The flares have already been lit.

     

    Hard to tell, but I think they’re trying to get two years flame from the horrible, no-good, very bad J6. Or maybe the next one is right around the corner. These days it’s like there’s a Reichstagbucks at every stoplight.

    They are primed and ready to go when the next George Floyd happens.

    Hope there isn’t an arrest underway the next time some hopped up woman-beater decides to OD while evading a felony.

    Chauvin is a political prisoner, and the coroner knows it.

    • #67
  8. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Percival (View Comment):

    They should have waited for the Reichstag to burn down.

    I thought that Jan 6th was the Reichstag incineration.

    • #68
  9. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    Hey, just asking… I see this speech was an official event paid for by the white house – not the DNC or a campaign…. Could this be a violation of the Hatch Act?

    • #69
  10. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    Hey, just asking… I see this speech was an official event paid for by the white house – not the DNC or a campaign…. Could this be a violation of the Hatch Act?

    Oh, yeah. Nothing will be done about it though.

    • #70
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Percival (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    Hey, just asking… I see this speech was an official event paid for by the white house – not the DNC or a campaign…. Could this be a violation of the Hatch Act?

    Oh, yeah. Nothing will be done about it though.

    The White House investigated itself and found that it did nothing wrong.

    • #71
  12. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    The contradictions are stunning.

    1. He says that supporting insurrection and supporting America are incompatible. He repeated it for emphasis. Standing in front of Independence Hall.

    2. He condemned political violence repeatedly, in several different formulations. Yet the only political violence these people notice is a bunch of miffed tourists who bumbled through some red ropes at the Capitol. Nothing on CHAZ/CHOP, Portlandistan, sustained BLM riots in multiple cities and the rest of the “mostly peaceful” 2020 “summer of flaming love”. He criticized “MAGA Republicans” for inciting insurrection (which has never been seen), but is silent on people like Nancy Pelosi and Mad Maxine Waters who actually, factually, on video, literally called for riots. Nothing about Democrats flaming, smashing riots in DC after the election of Trump.

    I’m thinking that a handy rubric for the following week is to see which conservative vs “conservative” voices will point this out. In particular, look for those who will make the first point (above) but not the second.

    The power of propaganda is the power to say patently absurd, provocative things without being challenged. See who’s falling to propaganda.

    The highlighted part is not true, BDB. There was actual rioting at the Capitol on January 6. Here is a video of part of it:

    I am very troubled by this. There seems to be an inability to face facts, on both left and right. We saw rioting in the summer of 2020 after the death of George Floyd, and people on the political left called it “peaceful protest.” That was false, and inexcusably so, in my view, as the facts were apparent.

    We saw the same thing on January 6, with rioting at the Capitol, and people on the political right seem to be claiming that it didn’t occur, as you did in this comment, BDB. That is false, as the facts are apparent. What is your excuse?

    I may or may not watch President Biden’s speech. It appears that he engaged in some inflammatory political rhetoric. It’s OK to criticize that, but what I’m seeing — here at Ricochet — are responses containing even more inflammatory rhetoric.

    Please, everybody, take a deep breath and calm down.

     

    It was a riot, and anyone in a riot deserves to be shot, but it was not an insurrection.   

    • #72
  13. Rōnin Coolidge
    Rōnin
    @Ronin

    I guess the take-away from the POTUS speech is 1) you are a “bad person” if you don’t agree with me and my side, and 2) don’t bring a gun to a F-15 fight.  OK, I got it, you don’t like me and I don’t like you, and you got bigger guns then me and you won’t be afraid to bring the full force down on my head because I deserve it.  You didn’t want to do it, but you had to to save the country and get everyone back into line.  I remember hearing something like this from my father as he beat the sh!t out of my mother and my siblings when he came home drunk.  Been there, done that, still got the scares.  Here’s the thing, Ho Chi Minh didn’t need advance warfare tech to kick the U.S. out of Vietnam, and us “deplorables” won’t need much to make  life a living hell for anyone looking for a fight.  Something for those who can’t see what’s going on to think about.

    • #73
  14. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Rōnin (View Comment):

    I guess the take-away from the POTUS speech is 1) you are a “bad person” if you don’t agree with me and my side, and 2) don’t bring a gun to a F-15 fight. OK, I got it, you don’t like me and I don’t like you, and you got bigger guns then me and you won’t be afraid to bring the full force down on my head because I deserve it. You didn’t want to do it, but you had to to save the country and get everyone back into line. I remember hearing something like this from my father as he beat the sh!t out of my mother and my siblings when he came home drunk. Been there, done that, still got the scares. Here’s the thing, Ho Chi Minh didn’t need advance warfare tech to kick the U.S. out of Vietnam, and us “deplorables” won’t need much to make life a living hell for anyone looking for a fight. Something for those who can’t see what’s going on to think about.

    Hell goes both ways, I guess. We just wanted to be left alone, but since the Left never stops, we’ll all have to be miserable. Equality at last.

    • #74
  15. Autistic License Coolidge
    Autistic License
    @AutisticLicense

    I’m liking arguments from both sides of this debate.  The Reichstag metaphor occurred to me early on, that the extreme left would use J6 to justify overreach against all dissent and they conformed to type and did so.  Then their Menshevik pals made more respectable sounding noise as cover.  

    On the other hand (hateful phrase) the J6 rioters were morons and deserved criminal penalties. Yes, as did the antifa commies who never saw consequences, for Portland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Chicago…  (Most popular early use of “anti fascist:” that wall keeping East Germany “safe” all those years). But the J6 idiots scored an own goal.  

    • #75
  16. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Autistic License (View Comment):

    I’m liking arguments from both sides of this debate. The Reichstag metaphor occurred to me early on, that the extreme left would use J6 to justify overreach against all dissent and they conformed to type and did so. Then their Menshevik pals made more respectable sounding noise as cover.

    On the other hand (hateful phrase) the J6 rioters were morons and deserved criminal penalties. Yes, as did the antifa commies who never saw consequences, for Portland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Chicago… (Most popular early use of “anti fascist:” that wall keeping East Germany “safe” all those years). But the J6 idiots scored an own goal.

    Well, maybe.  Except nobody should have to fear visiting the capitol.  Especially the ones who didn’t do anything, if they entered buildings at all it was because the Capitol Police held the doors open for them…

    • #76
  17. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    carcat74 (View Comment):

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    BDB: People ask what the purpose and the method is for this speech. I think it’s to provide a whole raft of language to the administration’s agents throughout industry, media, and in their terror wings as well (Antifa, BLM, whatever’s left of Occupy, and the school boards’ enforcers). The speech in itself does nothing. It’s not actually an Enabling Act speech, but can be a precursor. What it absolutely does is enable *others* to exercise special “emergency” powers, but without formal justification.

    I said it on ExJon’s post, and I’ll say it again: They’re trying to goad some unstable, fringe actors into committing acts of violence, which the Fascists in control of our institutions will use to justify a wide crackdown on all Republicans and those who dissent. And I’m pretty sure they found their patsies and have already urged and prepped them to act. Think Governor Whitmer’s “kidnappers.”

    Slow Joe just exponentially increased the possibility of things going kinetic.

    Who are they goading, though? The far right, or the far left? To paraphrase someone “what difference does it make?”.

    They could make a lot of hay out of a conservative shooting a pol; discredit the entire Republican party and turn people against the 2nd Amendment. 

    • #77
  18. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    TBA (View Comment):

    carcat74 (View Comment):

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    BDB: People ask what the purpose and the method is for this speech. I think it’s to provide a whole raft of language to the administration’s agents throughout industry, media, and in their terror wings as well (Antifa, BLM, whatever’s left of Occupy, and the school boards’ enforcers). The speech in itself does nothing. It’s not actually an Enabling Act speech, but can be a precursor. What it absolutely does is enable *others* to exercise special “emergency” powers, but without formal justification.

    I said it on ExJon’s post, and I’ll say it again: They’re trying to goad some unstable, fringe actors into committing acts of violence, which the Fascists in control of our institutions will use to justify a wide crackdown on all Republicans and those who dissent. And I’m pretty sure they found their patsies and have already urged and prepped them to act. Think Governor Whitmer’s “kidnappers.”

    Slow Joe just exponentially increased the possibility of things going kinetic.

    Who are they goading, though? The far right, or the far left? To paraphrase someone “what difference does it make?”.

    They could make a lot of hay out of a conservative shooting a pol; discredit the entire Republican party and turn people against the 2nd Amendment.

    Except it always seems to be a lefty who does the shooting, even at other lefties.  They can’t seem to agitate anyone on the right as much as they agitate “their own people.”

    • #78
  19. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Autistic License (View Comment):

    I’m liking arguments from both sides of this debate. The Reichstag metaphor occurred to me early on, that the extreme left would use J6 to justify overreach against all dissent and they conformed to type and did so. Then their Menshevik pals made more respectable sounding noise as cover.

    On the other hand (hateful phrase) the J6 rioters were morons and deserved criminal penalties. Yes, as did the antifa commies who never saw consequences, for Portland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Chicago… (Most popular early use of “anti fascist:” that wall keeping East Germany “safe” all those years). But the J6 idiots scored an own goal.

    What are the standard penalties for ‘trespassing’ and ‘parading’?  Cause I’m pretty sure its not being held in isolation without trial for two years, nor several years in prison for guilty verdicts.  

     

    • #79
  20. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    Autistic License (View Comment):

    I’m liking arguments from both sides of this debate. The Reichstag metaphor occurred to me early on, that the extreme left would use J6 to justify overreach against all dissent and they conformed to type and did so. Then their Menshevik pals made more respectable sounding noise as cover.

    On the other hand (hateful phrase) the J6 rioters were morons and deserved criminal penalties. Yes, as did the antifa commies who never saw consequences, for Portland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Chicago… (Most popular early use of “anti fascist:” that wall keeping East Germany “safe” all those years). But the J6 idiots scored an own goal.

    What are the standard penalties for ‘trespassing’ and ‘parading’? Cause I’m pretty sure its not being held in isolation without trial for two years, nor several years in prison for guilty verdicts.

     

    Yep.

    • #80
  21. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):
    What are the standard penalties for ‘trespassing’ and ‘parading’?  Cause I’m pretty sure its not being held in isolation without trial for two years, nor several years in prison for guilty verdicts.

    If you’re threatening President Trump, I think the standard penalty is being forgotten.

    • #81
  22. Nanocelt TheContrarian Member
    Nanocelt TheContrarian
    @NanoceltTheContrarian

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    The contradictions are stunning.

    1. He says that supporting insurrection and supporting America are incompatible. He repeated it for emphasis. Standing in front of Independence Hall.

    2. He condemned political violence repeatedly, in several different formulations. Yet the only political violence these people notice is a bunch of miffed tourists who bumbled through some red ropes at the Capitol. Nothing on CHAZ/CHOP, Portlandistan, sustained BLM riots in multiple cities and the rest of the “mostly peaceful” 2020 “summer of flaming love”. He criticized “MAGA Republicans” for inciting insurrection (which has never been seen), but is silent on people like Nancy Pelosi and Mad Maxine Waters who actually, factually, on video, literally called for riots. Nothing about Democrats flaming, smashing riots in DC after the election of Trump.

    I’m thinking that a handy rubric for the following week is to see which conservative vs “conservative” voices will point this out. In particular, look for those who will make the first point (above) but not the second.

    The power of propaganda is the power to say patently absurd, provocative things without being challenged. See who’s falling to propaganda.

    The highlighted part is not true, BDB. There was actual rioting at the Capitol on January 6. Here is a video of part of it:

    I am very troubled by this. There seems to be an inability to face facts, on both left and right. We saw rioting in the summer of 2020 after the death of George Floyd, and people on the political left called it “peaceful protest.” That was false, and inexcusably so, in my view, as the facts were apparent.

    We saw the same thing on January 6, with rioting at the Capitol, and people on the political right seem to be claiming that it didn’t occur, as you did in this comment, BDB. That is false, as the facts are apparent. What is your excuse?

    I may or may not watch President Biden’s speech. It appears that he engaged in some inflammatory political rhetoric. It’s OK to criticize that, but what I’m seeing — here at Ricochet — are responses containing even more inflammatory rhetoric.

    Please, everybody, take a deep breath and calm down.

     

    Those are the FBI plants, Jerry.

    • #82
  23. genferei Member
    genferei
    @genferei

    There’s a difference between not inflaming things when it’s a guy in a bar talking big in front of his girl, and when the tanks are already pouring over the border. 

    • #83
  24. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Autistic License (View Comment):

    I’m liking arguments from both sides of this debate. The Reichstag metaphor occurred to me early on, that the extreme left would use J6 to justify overreach against all dissent and they conformed to type and did so. Then their Menshevik pals made more respectable sounding noise as cover.

    On the other hand (hateful phrase) the J6 rioters were morons and deserved criminal penalties. Yes, as did the antifa commies who never saw consequences, for Portland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Chicago… (Most popular early use of “anti fascist:” that wall keeping East Germany “safe” all those years). But the J6 idiots scored an own goal.

    Well, maybe. Except nobody should have to fear visiting the capitol. Especially the ones who didn’t do anything, if they entered buildings at all it was because the Capitol Police held the doors open for them…

    Does any of the aforementioned 14,000 hours of video show the doors being held open?

    We don’t know.

    Is there video of Ray Epps exhorting a crowd to go into the Capitol?

    Why yes, yes there is. The same video shows the people standing around him chanting “Fed, Fed, Fed”. Not every riot instigator has to be successful to instigate a riot. Just one.

    Was Ray Epps ever charged with a crime?

    He didn’t enter the Capitol on Jan. 6, and was removed from the most wanted list because apparently he broke no laws,

    — Adam Kinzinger

    I wouldn’t take Adam Kinzinger’s word that water is wet.

    They need to focus peoples’ attention on Jan. 6th, but not too much attention. Tricky wicket, that.

     

    • #84
  25. Gazpacho Grande' Coolidge
    Gazpacho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    The contradictions are stunning.

    1. He says that supporting insurrection and supporting America are incompatible. He repeated it for emphasis. Standing in front of Independence Hall.

    2. He condemned political violence repeatedly, in several different formulations. Yet the only political violence these people notice is a bunch of miffed tourists who bumbled through some red ropes at the Capitol. Nothing on CHAZ/CHOP, Portlandistan, sustained BLM riots in multiple cities and the rest of the “mostly peaceful” 2020 “summer of flaming love”. He criticized “MAGA Republicans” for inciting insurrection (which has never been seen), but is silent on people like Nancy Pelosi and Mad Maxine Waters who actually, factually, on video, literally called for riots. Nothing about Democrats flaming, smashing riots in DC after the election of Trump.

    I’m thinking that a handy rubric for the following week is to see which conservative vs “conservative” voices will point this out. In particular, look for those who will make the first point (above) but not the second.

    The power of propaganda is the power to say patently absurd, provocative things without being challenged. See who’s falling to propaganda.

    The highlighted part is not true, BDB. There was actual rioting at the Capitol on January 6. Here is a video of part of it:

    I am very troubled by this. There seems to be an inability to face facts, on both left and right. We saw rioting in the summer of 2020 after the death of George Floyd, and people on the political left called it “peaceful protest.” That was false, and inexcusably so, in my view, as the facts were apparent.

    We saw the same thing on January 6, with rioting at the Capitol, and people on the political right seem to be claiming that it didn’t occur, as you did in this comment, BDB. That is false, as the facts are apparent. What is your excuse?

    I may or may not watch President Biden’s speech. It appears that he engaged in some inflammatory political rhetoric. It’s OK to criticize that, but what I’m seeing — here at Ricochet — are responses containing even more inflammatory rhetoric.

    Please, everybody, take a deep breath and calm down.

     

    Curious as to why you didn’t show the video of the cop beating a woman in the face in the tunnel on Jan. 6, killing her.

    I am very troubled by this.

    • #85
  26. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    So, wanting to make America great again is extremist.  Who knew?

    • #86
  27. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Biden has defined “the other.”  The next step is their destruction . . .

    • #87
  28. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Stad (View Comment):

    Biden has defined “the other.” The next step is their destruction . . .

    That is how it works.

    Cancel Culture is rehearsal for Genocide.

    • #88
  29. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    kedavis (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    carcat74 (View Comment):

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    BDB: People ask what the purpose and the method is for this speech. I think it’s to provide a whole raft of language to the administration’s agents throughout industry, media, and in their terror wings as well (Antifa, BLM, whatever’s left of Occupy, and the school boards’ enforcers). The speech in itself does nothing. It’s not actually an Enabling Act speech, but can be a precursor. What it absolutely does is enable *others* to exercise special “emergency” powers, but without formal justification.

    I said it on ExJon’s post, and I’ll say it again: They’re trying to goad some unstable, fringe actors into committing acts of violence, which the Fascists in control of our institutions will use to justify a wide crackdown on all Republicans and those who dissent. And I’m pretty sure they found their patsies and have already urged and prepped them to act. Think Governor Whitmer’s “kidnappers.”

    Slow Joe just exponentially increased the possibility of things going kinetic.

    Who are they goading, though? The far right, or the far left? To paraphrase someone “what difference does it make?”.

    They could make a lot of hay out of a conservative shooting a pol; discredit the entire Republican party and turn people against the 2nd Amendment.

    Except it always seems to be a lefty who does the shooting, even at other lefties. They can’t seem to agitate anyone on the right as much as they agitate “their own people.”

    There are two kinds of shooters; evil conservative militia members or tragically undermedicated politically confused lone wolves. 

    • #89
  30. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    So, wanting to make America great again is extremist. Who knew?

    Only a fascist would want a greater America when we could instead build it back better. I mean the difference is staggering. 

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.