When That Poll-taker Calls, Answer!

 

In the past week, I have taken at least three political polls; two online, and one over the phone.  Seeing as the upcoming midterm elections are extremely important to us, shouldn’t our opinions get registered?  But it seems like a large number of my Ricochet family members have a policy of not answering polls.  I would like to recommend that you change your policy.  How else are we going to get on the scoreboard, if our fellows don’t know that there are a large number of conservatives out there, who register their opinion?

In my retirement, I decided to sign up with a couple of websites that specialize in market research (I’ve always been a sucker for market research); they pay for your time, albeit a low amount, but it’s more than nothing.  I just last week participated in an online focus group, for which I stand to be paid $175.  Anyway, I ended up on YouGov’s panel, and they now send me regular surveys to fill out.  I get to state my political preferences directly, and I’m happy to be that kind of statistic.  I think that refusing to answer poll-takers makes it look like we aren’t there, and we need to make our opinions known.  I had a delightful half-hour conversation with a young Hispanic lady last week, and I got to register my preferences for our local candidates.  I even helped her with some name pronunciations; I think I made her day by being willing to talk to her, instead of just not answering.

Another benefit of taking the online surveys is I get to evaluate the political ads of the Leftist candidates.  I learned that our state congresspersons from the Democrat side are lying with every statement they make about the Republican candidates.  I never would have seen those ads, if I hadn’t been doing those surveys.  I am pleased to get my preferences out there, perhaps to encourage others to vote, who might have been discouraged by the poll results.  We all know that a lot of political polls skew Democrat, but can’t we change that by not hanging up on the poll-takers?  Give it some thought, and register your opinions when the poll-takers call.  If nothing else, you can make them mad when you support Donald Trump!

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 104 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Who are you, and what have you done with the Arahant that wrote #13?

    Do you see where I specified a number, a cutoff? You’re the one who says the 399th most popular name is unusual and unacceptable. Is your name at #398? Is that why you want that cutoff? Personally, I don’t find Pedro to be unusual, and I find your insistence that it is to be lowbrow at best, and probably disqualifying for public office.

    Let me simplify what I said in #13 for you:

    1. Give children sex-appropriate names.
    2. Give children whole names, not diminutives. That gives them more choices when they grow up.
    3. Don’t give your kids unusual names or names that will be made fun of, like Elmer or Homer. (Why did I mention those names? Elmer Fudd and Homer Simpson.) Studies have shown that unusual names tend to be more likely to lead to antisocial behavior and jail. The only Elmer I know of born after 1940 wound up dying in jail after raping an 80-year-old woman when he was in his late teens or early twenties.
    4. Avoid trendy names. While I didn’t get into this aspect, one reason is that they are more likely to have and cause confusion when the child gets to school and has five classmates of the same name. (That happened to my brother.)
    5. Avoid sexually ambiguous given names. (Sexually-ambiguous diminutives is not as big of a deal.)

    I haven’t known a Pedro since Elementary School. Call it 55 years.

    No one dares to like that name – Pedrophiles are treated very poorly. 

    • #91
  2. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    I do not trust any poll on guns. They are designed to put ideas in the heads of the naive.

    And names in the hands of the Feds . . .

    • #92
  3. Carlotta Member
    Carlotta
    @Charlotte

    El Rando (View Comment):

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    If only there were a Spanish version of the name Randy or Randell, I’d change my screen name to it for a week or so, just for fun.

    How about El Rando? Works on multiple levels.

    You got it, Carlotta. I realized my profile was out of date, I hadn’t updated it to show my new city and state.

    😂😂😂

    • #93
  4. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    What has all this to do with responding to poll-takers?

    • #94
  5. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    RushBabe49 (View Comment):

    What has all this to do with responding to poll-takers?

    It started with my rant about a poll-taker who hung up on me since I didn’t know her candidate with a man’s name was a goyle. It went down hill from there.

    • #95
  6. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    El Rando (View Comment):

    If only there were a Spanish version of the name Randy or Randell, I’d change my screen name to it for a week or so, just for fun.

    Go with Rando.

    • #96
  7. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    El Rando (View Comment):

    If only there were a Spanish version of the name Randy or Randell, I’d change my screen name to it for a week or so, just for fun.

    Go with Rando.

    Looks like someone already made the suggestion.  

    • #97
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Isn’t the Spanish version of “Randy” just “Randy” but more loudly?

    • #98
  9. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    Arahant (View Comment):
    It started with my rant about a poll-taker who hung up on me since I didn’t know her candidate with a man’s name was a goyle. It went down hill from there.

    I have participated in many polls in my 77 years and can tell you with certainty that the pollster’s reaction was an  aberration and very, very unusual.

    • #99
  10. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    It started with my rant about a poll-taker who hung up on me since I didn’t know her candidate with a man’s name was a goyle. It went down hill from there.

    I have participated in many polls in my 77 years and can tell you with certainty that the pollster’s reaction was an aberration and very, very unusual.

    For a political poll, it very well may have been conducted by people who were largely if not exclusively supporters of the candidate.

    • #100
  11. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    It started with my rant about a poll-taker who hung up on me since I didn’t know her candidate with a man’s name was a goyle. It went down hill from there.

    I have participated in many polls in my 77 years and can tell you with certainty that the pollster’s reaction was an aberration and very, very unusual.

    Well, to be fair, I did indicate it with the phrase, “Never heard of him.”

    • #101
  12. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    kedavis (View Comment):

    “Ask not for whom the poll calls, it calls for thee!”

    Oh come on, that was funny!

    And some of you people claim to enjoy puns…

    • #102
  13. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    kedavis (View Comment):
    For a political poll, it very well may have been conducted by people who were largely if not exclusively supporters of the candidate.

    That is no excuse for rudeness and does nothing to help the candidate they represent gain the possibility of changing minds. You win more flies with honey than vinegar.

    • #103
  14. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    For a political poll, it very well may have been conducted by people who were largely if not exclusively supporters of the candidate.

    That is no excuse for rudeness and does nothing to help the candidate they represent gain the possibility of changing minds. You win more flies with honey than vinegar.

    I’m sorry, have you met the Democrats?

     

    • #104
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.