Why the Raid on Trump’s Home?

 

A lot of people have been speculating as to the purpose of the FBI raid of the Mar-a-Lago estate.  The government leaked reasons for the raid, such as possessing documents that were property of the National Archives. no, really they were the nuclear codes, and, no really-really, possessing documents for espionage on behalf of foreign powers. But Trump was suing people based on the fraudulent and destructive Russia collusion narrative. He needed these documents as proof of the nefarious doings and dealing of a lot of people:

DONALD J. TRUMP,
Plaintiff,
v.
HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC.,
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,
DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, PERKINS
COIE, LLC, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, MARC
ELIAS, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ,
CHARLES HALLIDAY DOLAN, JR., JAKE
SULLIVAN, JOHN PODESTA, ROBERT E.
MOOK, PHILLIPE REINES, FUSION GPS,
GLENN SIMPSON, PETER FRITSCH,
NELLIE OHR, BRUCE OHR, ORBIS
BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD.,
CHRISTOPHER STEELE, IGOR DANCHENKO,
NEUSTAR, INC., RODNEY JOFFE, JAMES
COMEY, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE,
KEVIN CLINESMITH, ANDREW MCCABE,
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names
being fictious and unknown persons), and
ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10 (said
names being fictitious and unknown entities),…

Funny that. The closely tailored warrant was written to search for “Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021.” In other words, every single document (as well as declassified documents that bore the old classification imprint), every correspondence, photo, napkin, menu — everything — produced during the entire four years of Trump’s term.

This would include all the concrete evidence including declassified documents, texts, phone messages, recordings, photographs, memos, and notes, created by the US government in the process of perpetrating the so-called Russia hoax, that Trump possessed to prove his case in his law suit above.

Before:

After:

No wonder Garland looks so sick and oppressed. So much for professional ethics.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 36 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Years ago, I will never forget Rush Limbaugh reading a whole article by Norman Orenstein and some other guy. It made absolutely no sense. lol I mean isn’t that guy an academic or something? 

    What little I’ve heard him talk he just babbles to make excuses for more non-public goods. That’s basically the left in a nutshell.

    • #31
  2. W Bob Member
    W Bob
    @WBob

    Is there a reason that Trump himself wouldn’t be making this point loudly and clearly?

    • #32
  3. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    W Bob (View Comment):

    Is there a reason that Trump himself wouldn’t be making this point loudly and clearly?

    Lawyers?

    • #33
  4. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):
    The Jan 6 committee and hangers on stage right, audience left, each reciting their own brazenly slanderous speech giving rise to an endless but utterly repellent cacophony, and an orange man on audience right, stage left, absorbing all manner of blows while the audience awaits the famous closing crescendo, the Jig of the Orange Man.

    I’m not good with irony, and perhaps I wasn’t clear. The above is brilliant.

    Thank you. I was being sardonic since that appeared to be the mode you selected. Also, it provides a quick way to change course if one has misread the tone. How did I really mean that?

    • #34
  5. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    They (you know, those people) saw Trump wasn’t the overwhelming super-favorite nominee for 2024 and wanted to push him over the top. Because they still see him as the weak candidate, they propelled to the 2016 nomination with all of the free media attention. Probably the only thing more they could do for him is to very publicly arrest him and assign a regiment to guard him in a cell on Elba. They think they are discouraging the man and he is loving it. They think they are scaring us and all they’ve accomplished is to impress on low information voters that this is Gotham City from Batman Returns and they are eating live fish and drooling ebon (yes, ebon all you maggoty bigots out there) spittle during televised speeches.

    [Insert your favorite Trump jig animation here.]

    And when they finally have him killed (it’s not as if they haven’t already tried) the de Santis will rise as the most powerful American political figure of the 21st Century. Oh! To be privileged to live in these halcyon days!

    In the meantime, I encourage all of you with the wherewithal to donate generously to your local shelters and food banks. The Biden boom with it’s “Zero” inflation is ripping through our neighborhoods and families like a horseman of the Apocalypse.

    Happy Lord’s Day.

    de Santis?  Get real, they will turn him or destroy him also.  If they can do this to a POTUS a Governor is nothing.

    • #35
  6. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Some of the stuff may be used in trials against Trump but I suspect much of it is for opposition research for 2024.

    • #36
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.