Sexualization of Women’s Sports

 

Like many people, I have grown up watching gymnastics on TV, and I’ve always admired the strength and agility of the girls and young women. My attention was especially triggered by the latest controversy regarding the sexual abuse of the American Women’s Olympic team. Most of them were teenagers, not even through puberty, and I didn’t give any thought to their uniforms. It didn’t cross my mind that their choice of uniforms had anything to do with the abuse, and it still doesn’t.

But about a year ago, I saw a floor performance that made me very uncomfortable. The gymnast was a full-blown, mature-bodied woman, and her routine was sexy and (I thought) provocative. I watched the whole routine with a level of perplexity and discomfort, not understanding my reaction. Ever since then, I have questioned the appropriateness of woman’s gymnastic uniforms, and still don’t feel resolved about it.

A couple of years ago, some women from the German gymnastics team decided to make a change in their uniforms to a full body suit:

Per reports, the German Gymnastics Association (DTB) said the outfit change — which Sarah Voss started, followed by her teammates Kim Bui and Elisabeth Seitz — was done to take a stand against sexualization in the sport.

‘We hope gymnasts uncomfortable in the usual outfits will feel emboldened to follow our example,’ Voss told the BBC.

According to BBC, Bui, 32, initially performed in a leotard on Wednesday for the qualifying round. But after seeing Voss, 21, debut a full-body suit, both Bui and Seitz, 27, swapped outfits for the women’s all-around final on Friday.

Of course, the outfits still show nearly every nook, curve, and cranny, but the women are almost fully covered.

But not everyone is happy with changing women’s uniforms:

It’s 2021, but the policing of female athletes’ bodies is a practice that continues to thrive.

The Norwegian women’s beach handball team is in a battle with the sport’s governing bodies to wear less-revealing uniforms. After the team’s repeated complaints about the required bikini bottoms were reportedly ignored, they wore shorts during a recent game in protest and were fined 150 euros (around $175) per player.

Other women’s sports are having these conversations, too.

I realize that opinions about the exposure of women’s bodies depends on the setting: is she in a full bathing suit on the beach? A bikini thong at the pool? Does it matter how old or young she is? Does it matter if she’s appearing as a performer, or a movie star at a movie premiere?

I was intrigued by a candid and well-written article composed by a teenager for her school newspaper:

In the 20th century, efforts were made towards the feminist movement that highlighted how differently women are viewed and treated in the sporting community compared to men. Some athletes claim they were rejected from certain sporting opportunities because their bodies didn’t look ‘efficient enough.’ Doing so goes against Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which states, ‘No person in the United States shall, based on sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.’

Sports should be open to and equal for everyone. All genders should be viewed based on their athletic ability, not appearance or a strict dress code like the one females are obligated to follow. These dress codes currently being enforced should be optional; females should be able to compete in what they feel most comfortable in.

A woman should have the opportunity to choose what coverage and modesty that she wants to adhere to. These decisions should be made by the athlete.

Now there’s a word that has most definitely gone out of fashion: modesty. Does anyone care about dressing modestly anymore?

Or am I too old-fashioned and must accept that just about “anything goes”?

Published in Sports
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 75 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. OldPhil Coolidge
    OldPhil
    @OldPhil

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    Gymnastics where the tight outfits and the movements would rival a strip club at times…ai don’t think you are conflicted at all about this.

    Thanks, David. I haven’t even addressed the trans questions–what then? And the some of the women’s beach volleyball players barely have anything on.

    I watch women’s beach volley ball for the superior athleticism. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it. Swimmer’s outfits are a whole other thing. You may recall there was a trend for a time of wearing special textured body suits, men and women, that supposedly shaved fractions of seconds off laps.

    I see the reason, but women’s track and field uniforms, especially the runners, are basically bikinis now.

    See the source image

    • #31
  2. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    Justin Other Lawyer (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    I should probably recuse myself here, given that I have a conflict of interest and a particular appreciation for female pole vaulters.

    But the problem of excessive sexualization of young women is and always has been real. Women as objects of sexual desire is baked in to the human equation, something that (as @ douglasmyers noted above) parents should try to address. Our solution was to raise the kids in what was essentially a Mennonite community where modest dress was the norm, and for them to to have no television or internet. That isn’t practical for everyone; I’m not absolutely convinced that it’s even a good idea, though I think it worked out well for us.

    Without minimizing the harm done to young athletes by predatory men who work with them (and I know there have been awful instances of that), I think the new and terrible challenge today is social media and ubiquitous pornography: in a word, smart phones. We’re seeing an aspect of it in the social contagion of the trans movement that is seducing so many young women down a very dark path. I think we’ll be facing something new and unhealthy in the next few years, thanks to unchecked childhood access to the internet. And I don’t think there is much chance of changing it, of changing the parenting behavior to somehow control this new technology. For better or worse, we will have to adapt as a culture.

    I think this is largely correct. We too tried to encourage (read: require, but nicely) our daughters to wear modest clothing. But my wife also exhibits modesty, which also helps, and we tried to train our sons to respect women/girls and not objectify them. Obviously, I know we didn’t succeed completely, but most of our children have reached adulthood and continue to, for the most part, demonstrate the modesty and respect we (attempted) to train.

    My daughter-in-law is very concerned about modesty. She is amazed how even among her friends (mostly orthodox Catholics) there is a real blind spot about dressing and acting modestly.

    • #32
  3. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    colleenb (View Comment):
    My daughter-in-law is very concerned about modesty. She is amazed how even among her friends (mostly orthodox Catholics) there is a real blind spot about dressing and acting modestly.

    The entire culture has been corrupted by the desire to get attention and be noticed. Clothes are just another means to do that. 

    • #33
  4. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    I’m sorry but the whole bum shots on beach volleyball is just so obvious. I’m sure it’s ONLY to show all the great strategy (wink, wink). I thought it was great when the beach volleyball team would not wear the bikinis to play. More power to them. I’ve basically stopped watching most sports and I think part of the reason is it feels exploitative. More for women than men but it even feels that way with the guys. Track, gymnastics, swimming, etc.

    • #34
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    Gymnastics where the tight outfits and the movements would rival a strip club at times…ai don’t think you are conflicted at all about this.

    Thanks, David. I haven’t even addressed the trans questions–what then? And the some of the women’s beach volleyball players barely have anything on.

    I watch women’s beach volley ball for the superior athleticism. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it. Swimmer’s outfits are a whole other thing. You may recall there was a trend for a time of wearing special textured body suits, men and women, that supposedly shaved fractions of seconds off laps.

    I see the reason, but women’s track and field uniforms, especially the runners, are basically bikinis now.

    See the source image

    My younger brother used to do bicycle racing, all the racers would shave their arms and legs; not to lower wind resistance, but to reduce damage if they fell onto pavement.  Hairy arms and legs makes it a lot worse.

    • #35
  6. Justin Other Lawyer Coolidge
    Justin Other Lawyer
    @DouglasMyers

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    Gymnastics where the tight outfits and the movements would rival a strip club at times…ai don’t think you are conflicted at all about this.

    Thanks, David. I haven’t even addressed the trans questions–what then? And the some of the women’s beach volleyball players barely have anything on.

    I watch women’s beach volley ball for the superior athleticism. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it. Swimmer’s outfits are a whole other thing. You may recall there was a trend for a time of wearing special textured body suits, men and women, that supposedly shaved fractions of seconds off laps.

    I see the reason, but women’s track and field uniforms, especially the runners, are basically bikinis now.

    See the source image

    My younger brother used to do bicycle racing, all the racers would shave their arms and legs; not to lower wind resistance, but to reduce damage if they fell onto pavement. Hairy arms and legs makes it a lot worse.

    I’ve heard different kinds of “theories” on the shaving thing.  I heard with swimmers it was analogous to swinging several bats before stepping up to the plate in baseball.  One bats just feels a whole lot lighter than three, so the swing feels faster.  Similar in swimming–if a person has let his/her hair grow all season, only to completely shave prior to a big meet, the swimmer feels sleeker in the water.  I’m pretty sure in that case it’s all mental.

    • #36
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Justin Other Lawyer (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    Gymnastics where the tight outfits and the movements would rival a strip club at times…ai don’t think you are conflicted at all about this.

    Thanks, David. I haven’t even addressed the trans questions–what then? And the some of the women’s beach volleyball players barely have anything on.

    I watch women’s beach volley ball for the superior athleticism. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it. Swimmer’s outfits are a whole other thing. You may recall there was a trend for a time of wearing special textured body suits, men and women, that supposedly shaved fractions of seconds off laps.

    I see the reason, but women’s track and field uniforms, especially the runners, are basically bikinis now.

    See the source image

    My younger brother used to do bicycle racing, all the racers would shave their arms and legs; not to lower wind resistance, but to reduce damage if they fell onto pavement. Hairy arms and legs makes it a lot worse.

    I’ve heard different kinds of “theories” on the shaving thing. I heard with swimmers it was analogous to swinging several bats before stepping up to the plate in baseball. One bats just feels a whole lot lighter than three, so the swing feels faster. Similar in swimming–if a person has let his/her hair grow all season, only to completely shave prior to a big meet, the swimmer feels sleeker in the water. I’m pretty sure in that case it’s all mental.

    There might actually be some friction advantage to being hairless for swimming, even if it is mostly psychological.  But the benefits for bicycle racing are much more definite.

    • #37
  8. Chris O Coolidge
    Chris O
    @ChrisO

    I grew up around gymnastics because of my older sister. Well, really, I was dragged to meets all over the state up to my early mid-teens. I ran scores, stuff like that, even had a team shirt. BUT….

    After my sister graduated I went to a meet and felt like a creep. It had been a couple years and the girls were my age. I must have been desensitized to it, but there on my own…well, I was no longer a little brother and had no connection to the team other than longtime support. It was weird, but in a “I’m here alone and what are these parents thinking of me?” sort of way. I guess that’s tacit acknowledgement of your point, Susan.

    The gymnasts had nothing to be embarrassed about. It’s what the performance-oriented attire happened to be and had been for decades. I don’t recall thinking anything about it. When I think of it now, well, those outfits are thicker material than they used to be, but they also seem to be cut higher. It just seems a tool of the trade. Sure, add legs to it.

    Besides I was a soccer player in the 1980’s and our shorts weren’t much when it came to modesty. It wasn’t a body suit, mind you, but not much imagination required, especially after a slide tackle.

    Terry Butcher gets stuck in against Platini.

    • #38
  9. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    Stina (View Comment):
    A skin suit may not add appreciably to a swimmer’s drag opposed to a speedo.

    Actually, the suits are LOWER drag than bare skin. It is impressive.

    • #39
  10. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    iWe (View Comment):

    Imagine the chaos if there were no uniforms in sports, and everyone just wore what they wanted!

    In some way, uniforms can help players focus on what should matter more: performance. Can you imagine the time that would be spent picking your outfit if you were going to be on a broadcasted game, and there were no uniforms?

    Next the military will be wanting to do that. 

    • #40
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Chris O (View Comment):

    I grew up around gymnastics because of my older sister. Well, really, I was dragged to meets all over the state up to my early mid-teens. I ran scores, stuff like that, even had a team shirt. BUT….

    After my sister graduated I went to a meet and felt like a creep. It had been a couple years and the girls were my age. I must have been desensitized to it, but there on my own…well, I was no longer a little brother and had no connection to the team other than longtime support. It was weird, but in a “I’m here alone and what are these parents thinking of me?” sort of way. I guess that’s tacit acknowledgement of your point, Susan.

    The gymnasts had nothing to be embarrassed about. It’s what the performance-oriented attire happened to be and had been for decades. I don’t recall thinking anything about it. When I think of it now, well, those outfits are thicker material than they used to be, but they also seem to be cut higher. It just seems a tool of the trade. Sure, add legs to it.

    Besides I was a soccer player in the 1980’s and our shorts weren’t much when it came to modesty. It wasn’t a body suit, mind you, but not much imagination required, especially after a slide tackle.

     

    Terry Butcher gets stuck in against Platini.

    But they probably aren’t “going commando.”

    • #41
  12. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    • #42
  13. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    This is what you really wanted:

     

    • #43
  14. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    I have many thoughts on this, but no useful ‘take’. 

    1. Bodies in motion are sexy.
    2. A dedicated pervert can perv on almost anything.
    3. Most men are at least part-time hounds.
    4. Different dress standards within a sport may well influence judges unduly (see 4, above). 
    5. Men don’t seem to have trouble with uniforms being too revealing. 
    6. In olden days, a glimpse of stocking was looked on as something shocking; now workout clothes, are designed for ‘hoes. 
    • #44
  15. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot) Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot)
    @ArizonaPatriot

    Susan Quinn:

    I was intrigued by a candid and well-written article composed by a teenager for her school newspaper:

    In the 20th century, efforts were made towards the feminist movement that highlighted how differently women are viewed and treated in the sporting community compared to men. Some athletes claim they were rejected from certain sporting opportunities because their bodies didn’t look ‘efficient enough.’ Doing so goes against Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which states, ‘No person in the United States shall, based on sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.’

    Sports should be open to and equal for everyone. All genders should be viewed based on their athletic ability, not appearance or a strict dress code like the one females are obligated to follow. These dress codes currently being enforced should be optional; females should be able to compete in what they feel most comfortable in.

    A woman should have the opportunity to choose what coverage and modesty that she wants to adhere to. These decisions should be made by the athlete.

    So . . . gymnasts and ice skaters and dancers in a burkha?

    It doesn’t really work to leave it up to the athletes, either.  In an artistic-type sport, where attractiveness matters, the outfits may make a difference.  There is an element of eroticism that it is difficult to completely eliminate.

    In my experience, the athletes or dancers who push the envelope get rewarded, which tends to cause the activity to decline into something that looks more like pole dancing.

     

    • #45
  16. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Stad (View Comment):

    iWe (View Comment):
    Imagine the chaos if there were no uniforms in sports, and everyone just wore what they wanted!

    I’m looking forward to nude beach volleyball . . .

    What do volleyballs wear now?

    • #46
  17. OldPhil Coolidge
    OldPhil
    @OldPhil

    TBA (View Comment):
    Most men are at least part-time hounds.

    See the source image

    • #47
  18. Limestone Cowboy Coolidge
    Limestone Cowboy
    @LimestoneCowboy

    JoelB (View Comment):

    My immediate reaction was “You girls are just now noticing this?”

    Actually what they wear in the gym doesn’t bother me nearly as much as what some of them wear on the street.

    And to the office… Yoga pants? Really?

    • #48
  19. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Limestone Cowboy (View Comment):

    JoelB (View Comment):

    My immediate reaction was “You girls are just now noticing this?”

    Actually what they wear in the gym doesn’t bother me nearly as much as what some of them wear on the street.

    And to the office… Yoga pants? Really?

    Well they can’t be fired for it, they’ll claim it’s racism, sexism…

    • #49
  20. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    In my experience, the athletes or dancers who push the envelope get rewarded, which tends to cause the activity to decline into something that looks more like pole dancing.

    Have you seen a high school, or middle school dance team? 

    • #50
  21. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    In my experience, the athletes or dancers who push the envelope get rewarded, which tends to cause the activity to decline into something that looks more like pole dancing.

    Have you seen a high school, or middle school dance team?

    Even at my son’s Catholic high school, I could not watch the dance teams. And he chose not to watch them if at all possible for the sexualization you point out. “But it’s what everyone is doing.” Bah.

    • #51
  22. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    Three Dog!

    • #52
  23. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot) Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot)
    @ArizonaPatriot

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    In my experience, the athletes or dancers who push the envelope get rewarded, which tends to cause the activity to decline into something that looks more like pole dancing.

    Have you seen a high school, or middle school dance team?

    Three of my kids were involved in serious dance, though at studios and not at school.  I have a lot of experience watching teenagers dance, for about 20 years now.

    They ended up at a studio that doesn’t do competitions.  We were involved in some competitions in the early years, and the tendency was for the audience to “whoop” most loudly for the worst stuff.

    My impression is that it was not the bulk of the audience.  Rather, there would be one or two studios that seemed, to the rest of us, to be training the teenaged girls to be strippers — and their parents and families were the loudest.

    • #53
  24. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    BDB (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    Three Dog!

    It Happened One Night (1934). Claudette Colbert & Clark Gable. Claudette is the one with the gams.

    • #54
  25. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    Percival (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

     One Night (1934). Claudette Colbert & Clark Gable. Claudette is the one with the gams.

    There’s at least 2 reasons why she was a star!

     

    • #55
  26. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    colleenb (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    One Night (1934). Claudette Colbert & Clark Gable. Claudette is the one with the gams.

    There’s at least 2 reasons why she was a star!

     

    Too thin.  But I suppose back then, even exposed toothpicks was VA VA VOOM!!!

    • #56
  27. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    kedavis (View Comment):

    colleenb (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    One Night (1934). Claudette Colbert & Clark Gable. Claudette is the one with the gams.

     

    There’s at least 2 reasons why she was a star!

     

    Too thin. But I suppose back then, even exposed toothpicks was VA VA VOOM!!!

    Compared to today’s stick actresses, I bet Claudette had some curves.

    • #57
  28. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    colleenb (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    colleenb (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    One Night (1934). Claudette Colbert & Clark Gable. Claudette is the one with the gams.

     

    There’s at least 2 reasons why she was a star!

     

    Too thin. But I suppose back then, even exposed toothpicks was VA VA VOOM!!!

    Compared to today’s stick actresses, I bet Claudette had some curves.

    Stick?  I dunno, Twiggy was a long time ago.  Have you seen Margot Robbie, for example?

    • #58
  29. Chuck Coolidge
    Chuck
    @Chuckles

    kedavis (View Comment):

    colleenb (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    One Night (1934). Claudette Colbert & Clark Gable. Claudette is the one with the gams.

    There’s at least 2 reasons why she was a star!

     

    Too thin. But I suppose back then, even exposed toothpicks was VA VA VOOM!!!

    Too thin? Toothpicks? Really?

     

    • #59
  30. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Chuck (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    colleenb (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):

    In olden days, a glimpse of stocking
    Was looked on as something shocking
    But now, God knows
    Anything goes

    One Night (1934). Claudette Colbert & Clark Gable. Claudette is the one with the gams.

    There’s at least 2 reasons why she was a star!

     

    Too thin. But I suppose back then, even exposed toothpicks was VA VA VOOM!!!

    Too thin? Toothpicks? Really?

     

    Still kinda thin, but what years were those photos taken?

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.