You’re Fired!

 

A few weeks ago, Kimberly Strassel of the Wall Street Journal noted that in spite of multiple examples of incompetence and non-performance in the Biden Administration, Joe Biden hasn’t fired anyone. Since it’s been reported that he has 560 people in the Executive Office, he certainly has plenty of people to choose from. So I have to wonder, after almost two years, is there no one he’d like to replace with somebody more knowledgeable and competent in any position?

Having the same staff in place after all this time is a mystery to me. Does Biden think his people are more talented than the rest of us who see how disastrous their performance is? Is there a secret prohibition against letting people go? Does he think firing someone will make him “look bad?” (Is there a way he could look any worse than he does?) Or did he demand that everyone needed to take a loyalty oath when they were hired that would guarantee them lifetime federal government employment?

More than that, why would people want to stick around with his crashing ratings in the polls? Are people threatening to quit and people in the Executive Office forbidding them to do so?

Or maybe there is a Progressive in the shadows who decides who leaves and who stays. Maybe that person takes his or her direction from George Soros. Maybe Soros has had to bribe them all to stay.

Who would you fire first if you had the power to do it (and no cheating and picking Biden)? My top pick would be Mayorkas, DHS Director.

Do you have any theories on the reasons that no one has been fired? Doesn’t it seem odd to you, too?

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 72 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. mildlyo Member
    mildlyo
    @mildlyo

    To the OP, it could be another sign of cognitive decline.

    Does our president value familiar faces around himself more than any consideration of competence?

    • #31
  2. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    EJHill (View Comment):

    There are two basic assumptions that need to be made first:

    A) That Biden’s mental state is such that he is aware of the chaos.

    B) That Biden is fundamentally displeased with the results.

    I’m not going to speculate on the President’s mental acuity. As for the second assumption, I would posit that the destruction that they are waging is going exactly as planned. What is not going as planned is the political reaction to it. They believed in their heart of hearts that this destruction would be hailed as bold and necessary and accepted overwhelmingly.

    Shortly after his inauguration, the White House muppeteers invited a bunch of leftwing historians such as Michael Beschloss and Doris Kearns Goodwin to come in and convince him he was the monogrammed reincarnation of FDR, JFK and LBJ all rolled into one. It just wasn’t his duty, it was his destiny to “go big.” Of course, the fact that he didn’t have the majorities in Congress to do that wasn’t a factor. He would be so beloved the country would roll over for him.

    But that didn’t happen. And his monogram, JRB, was replaced with FJB.

    The persistent report out of the White House is that Joe is flummoxed that his approval rating is now lower than the man he was elected to replace. Neither he or his Prime Minister Chief of Staff, Ron Klain, understood his “mandate” was to be a caretaker president, to not rock the boat and get us to 2024 without too many crises. But they wanted these events. They wanted to destroy the dollar, destroy the energy sector (and with it the economy) and destroy the fabric of society so they could remake it and be declared saviors.

    FDR convinced America that he had to chart new courses. “The country needs,” he said in 1932, “and unless I mistake its temper the country demands bold persistent experimentation. It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails admit it frankly and try another. But above all try something.” The problem is, by comparison, the Trump years look pretty good. Half the population is looking at him and saying, “Oh, look. There’s the arsonist who wants us to think he saved the puppy!”

    I think you give Joe way, way too much credit. He is just an amoral, venial, dishonest, ultra ambitious life-long political hack whose hubris and ambition for power finally found its opening through Donald Trump. Once at the peak of political power, he was too far gone to do anything with it. What we now have is a dementia affected querulous husk of an old man who, in public events, must be told where to stand and when to sit.

    • #32
  3. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    mildlyo (View Comment):

    To the OP, it could be another sign of cognitive decline.

    Does our president value familiar faces around himself more than any consideration of competence?

    You’re assuming that he’s still able to recognize people. I wouldn’t bet on it, at least with some of them . . . 

    • #33
  4. WI Con Member
    WI Con
    @WICon

    In addition to many of the well reasoned points, I’d add that they can order crew members off a sinking ship but finding new crew members at that point – you won’t find many takers.

    I don’t doubt that the staff ranks are populated with anarchists/Leftists purposefully working to take the US down, that there are diversity hires-too trapped/stupid to realize they’ve hitched their wagon to horse on his way to the glue factory. 

    The “stink of failure” is all over this White House, those smart enough  would never be on that side politically in the first place. Those that corrupt but intelligent don’t want to ruin future prospects. I disliked Jen Psaki a great deal but she was savvy enough to get the hell out. As someone who lies and spins for a living, even she knew there’s only so much disbelief people can willingly suspend. If you’re ‘selling crap’, you may as well do it for more money and better hours, hence the MSM gig.

    Conservative Treehouse had a really interesting point that he made about Trump’s personnel turnover/issues. I agree it sure was chaotic but many of those people were ‘ok’d’ and members in good standing in The GOP Swamp. DeSantis (if he’s the Real Deal, if he’s serious, is going to have problems staffing as well). 

    I like DeSantis and Rand Paul a great deal but have to admit, the TDS Trump has produced in that town – I have never, ever seen a GOP politician induce that type of reaction ( not Nixon, not Reagan) that level or terror(?) in that city. That alone still makes him attractive as a candidate, warts and all.

     

     

    • #34
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: Are people threatening to quit and people in the Executive Office forbid them to do so?

    How would that work in practice?

    “I quit!”

    “You can’t! We won’t allow it!”

    “So you’re gonna keep paying me when I refuse to show up? Cool.”

    It worked for Mayor Pete!

    • #35
  6. DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Merrick Garland reminds me of that little creep Stalin used to keep around until he had him photoshot.

    Revolutionary governments like Biden’s don’t like to simply fire people – that’d be an admission of error. The complex of lies they bind themselves with requires more than just a dignified departure and replacement of the individual.

    Maybe they’re afraid that if someone is fired, that person will report their deep, dark secrets.

    Yeah, it’s probably more like this. The complex of lies bind them together with cords that cannot be broken — without risking the whole charade being uncovered.

    • #36
  7. DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    WI Con (View Comment):
    The “stink of failure” is all over this White House, those smart enough  would never be on that side politically in the first place. Those that corrupt but intelligent don’t want to ruin future prospects.

    In the real world, nobody who worked in this disastrous administration would ever find work again.

    Alas, Washington isn’t the real world.

    • #37
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):

    WI Con (View Comment):
    The “stink of failure” is all over this White House, those smart enough would never be on that side politically in the first place. Those that corrupt but intelligent don’t want to ruin future prospects.

    In the real world, nobody who worked in this disastrous administration would ever find work again.

    Alas, Washington isn’t the real world.

    Neither is Hollyweird.  Same kinds of problems.

    • #38
  9. genferei Member
    genferei
    @genferei

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR. 

    • #39
  10. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    Objectively, yes.  But they think they’re doing great.  Their analysis is as bad as everything else they do.

    • #40
  11. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    Propaganda can also function through displaying the raw power to issue ridiculous statements and policies and have them taken at face value, despite obvious falsehood.  The Democrats are no longer in the “good PR” business — they don’t need it.  They’re in the “I dare you to point this out” business.

    • #41
  12. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    Biden is the one who has to go because the Chinese hide behind him.  Once he goes it should be a cascade with no end, leading to a special election.   Three years is too long and the Chinese will have done what they can in that period. 

    • #42
  13. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Buckpasser (View Comment):
    Oh forget it. I can’t settle on just one.

    I know what you mean! Too many great choices!

    My dream is for all 560 of them to file into the unemployment office and have them introduced to the clerk by Karine Jean-Pierre.  Of course, she’d have to leaf through her notebook to come up with their names but, hey, that’s no worse than she’s doing now.

    • #43
  14. MWD B612 "Dawg" Member
    MWD B612 "Dawg"
    @danok1

    I Walton (View Comment):

    Biden is the one who has to go because the Chinese hide behind him. Once he goes it should be a cascade with no end, leading to a special election. Three years is too long and the Chinese will have done what they can in that period.

    There is no provision for a “special election” in the Constitution. If the President is removed from office, resigns, or dies, the VP becomes President. A new VP is nominated by the new POTUS and confirmed.

    • #44
  15. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Susan Quinn: Do you have any theories on the reasons that no one has been fired? Doesn’t it seem odd to you, too?

    Given the number of people who’ve quit, he doesn’t have to fire anyone!

    JK.  Yes, it is odd.  Trump fired a lot of people because they couldn’t – or wouldn’t – advance his agenda . . .

    • #45
  16. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    How can anybody in their administration be fired? They were all hired for their intersectionality points. It is not like they will stop being a black african american from jamaica that is homosexual into furries.

    Can’t fire the token. They are all tokens.

    Seriously, how can you? 

    Then you will be firing them because you hate them and you are a hate-ist or hate-ophobe

     

    • #46
  17. Vince Guerra Inactive
    Vince Guerra
    @VinceGuerra

    It makes sense if everything we’re seeing is happening just as planned. The globalists and communists are sitting in control of American government, they’ve worked decades for this moment. They’ve got their foot on the gas pedal and if anything his people are going to be getting medals, not pink slips.

    • #47
  18. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    • #48
  19. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    How is it a messaging problem when it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that what they want simply doesn’t work?

    • #49
  20. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    Why fire anyone? He would have to be sentient enough to know things are going horribly wrong. He is not and whoever is whispering in his ear tells him to blame Trump, Putin, MAGA, white supremecists, whatever. So why would he fire anyone unless they denied him ice cream and little girls’ hair to sniff?

    • #50
  21. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    How is it a messaging problem when it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that what they want simply doesn’t work?

    What they want is graft. It works over and over and over again. For them. They aren’t stealing elections because everyone is voting for them.

    • #51
  22. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    How is it a messaging problem when it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that what they want simply doesn’t work?

    What they want is graft. It works over and over and over again. For them. They aren’t stealing elections because everyone is voting for them.

    I’m sure that many/most/all of the hangers-on are just in it for the graft, but the people at the top – at least of the “movement” if not of any particular government – seem to actually believe that garbage.

    • #52
  23. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    How is it a messaging problem when it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that what they want simply doesn’t work?

    What they want is graft. It works over and over and over again. For them. They aren’t stealing elections because everyone is voting for them.

    I’m sure that many/most/all of the hangers-on are just in it for the graft, but the people at the top – at least of the “movement” if not of any particular government – seem to actually believe that garbage.

    I’d bet we’ve been having that debate since civilization started: Are the people of the left evil or merely stupid? I think the answer is both. They believe the lie,  but only because lying pays.

    • #53
  24. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    How is it a messaging problem when it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that what they want simply doesn’t work?

    You are going to own nothing and be happy about it. You’ll eat bugs, and be hapy about that too if they win.

    (And here, the Spartan replies: “If.”)

     

    • #54
  25. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Barfly (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    How is it a messaging problem when it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that what they want simply doesn’t work?

    What they want is graft. It works over and over and over again. For them. They aren’t stealing elections because everyone is voting for them.

    I’m sure that many/most/all of the hangers-on are just in it for the graft, but the people at the top – at least of the “movement” if not of any particular government – seem to actually believe that garbage.

    I’d bet we’ve been having that debate since civilization started: Are the people of the left evil or merely stupid? I think the answer is both. They believe the lie, but only because lying pays.

    Naw, the lie doesn’t pay for many perhaps most people who believe it.  They believe it because they think it makes them better people.

    • #55
  26. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

    It’s a messaging problem. All of it. Always.

    How is it a messaging problem when it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that what they want simply doesn’t work?

    What they want is graft. It works over and over and over again. For them. They aren’t stealing elections because everyone is voting for them.

    I’m sure that many/most/all of the hangers-on are just in it for the graft, but the people at the top – at least of the “movement” if not of any particular government – seem to actually believe that garbage.

    I’d bet we’ve been having that debate since civilization started: Are the people of the left evil or merely stupid? I think the answer is both. They believe the lie, but only because lying pays.

    Naw, the lie doesn’t pay for many perhaps most people who believe it. They believe it because they think it makes them better people.

    Maybe we’re running up against Cipolla’s 2nd quadrant, that he had to bisect. All of the believers are stupid, but the smarter ones are bandits too.

    • #56
  27. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Like mentioned above, Garland deserves to be first because his dereliction has hurt the most people the most.

    However, due to sheer incompetence and horrible results for the job they were hired for:

     Secretary of Energy

    FILE PHOTO: Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm takes questions during a media briefing at the White House in Washington, U.S., November 23, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

    • #57
  28. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

     

     

    • #58
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Columbo (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):

    For an administration / party / political tendency that seems to fervently believe in the primacy of PR over reality, they are really bad at PR.

     

     

    You’ll know it’s really too late when someone makes a youtube of Harris cackling for TEN HOURS.

     

    • #59
  30. navyjag Coolidge
    navyjag
    @navyjag

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    If you’re curious, Trump had 12 senior officials whom he fired or who resigned by the end of his term:

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-officials-fired-or-resigned-since-election-2020-11?op=1

    This quote of Trump appeared on Wikipedia:

    Trump justified the instability, saying: “We have acting people. The reason they are acting is because I’m seeing how I like them, and I’m liking a lot of them very, very much. There are people who have done a bad job, and I let them go. If you call that turmoil, I don’t call that turmoil. I say that is being smart. That’s what we do.”

    Unfortuneatly it was not enough. 

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.