Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Roe v. Wade is Overturned: Why am I Not Happy?
In every war, there are tragedies and victories. We tend to look at the final result, but the victories can be temporary and fragile, and the tragedies can be devastating. As a result, I’m having trouble finding a way to embrace the entire picture of the SCOTUS decision.
Yes, the victories are obvious to me. There is so much to celebrate and appreciate. But I feel overwhelmed by the many losses that have already been endured, and the many we could face:
So many millions of babies have died.
A kind of narcissism has flourished in the face of women’s desires.
Families have been damaged by the choices to abort.
Men have become second-class citizens, often having no choice in the decision.
Women have been wounded after the fact, later realizing they killed a child.
And looking ahead, even more losses:
Corrupt companies will finance travel for women who choose to abort.
Violence could erupt as people refuse to accept justice and decide to destroy businesses, homes and communities.
Local governments will enact laws that allow abortion to flourish.
And I could add many more negative outcomes.
I want to rejoice.
I want to thank G-d and the justices for their wisdom.
But it’s difficult.
Maybe I need to look to my own humility in the face of this dilemma.
Published in Culture
Let us pray.
Well said.
For identity? That’s nonsense. They view sex as self-centered pleasure. That’s it. There’s no higher calling to it.
No, Manny. We live in a society obsessed with identity. Only people like us talk about “same-sex attracted” individuals rather than “gays” or “homosexuals.” Sexual identity is everything in the current culture. We’ve had members who “identify” with the Right, but can’t get past their own same-sex attracted inclinations to admit how destructive legitimizing the lie of same-sex marriage is to our society and families. Some “gays” recognize it, but others are too caught up in their identity and have that incurable blind spot.
Thank you for your kind words, Foghorn. Also, my deepest condolences re the loss of your son. My heart aches for you.
Thank you, David.
I don’t know. I think self centered pleasure comes first over identity. After all sex is predominant whether one is straight or gay or whatever. The common denominator is sex. But what do I know?
I’m agnostic on abortion, but I firmly take the middle ground on murder.
Abortion is an evil as seen in the behavior of those who support it. Promiscuous sex. Decline in marriage. Expendable humans. Culture of death. Bastardized politics. It has divided the country just as slavery did.
Who should be miserable, those who kill babies or those who support life? We aren’t responsible for their misery. Their debased morality is to blame.
Sadly, I must agree. They have had weeks to intimidate the court with nothing from the FBI or US Attorneys to deter illegal actions. It did not work, so now they are not going to simply go away. Its another summer of violence I fear. And then the question will be whether the voters will punish them, or be permitted to do so? I wish I knew whether we have a functioning democracy. Actually I am not sure that I want to know that we don’t.
More than that. Sex is an expression of power. It is a very pagan point of view.
It’s going to be a grass roots effort in each of the 50 legislatures. It will be state legislators who are elected by constituencies of about 10,000 or so people who will make these decisions. And some of the states will settle their abortion policy by referendum.
It’s been a 50 year deception and they’ve had the courage to recognize and make it right. It’s huge, but there will be many more battles. We can’t change the past – only today.
I can fight for what I believe in my state but at least my state and not California will decide.
Scarlett O’Hara: “I won’t think about that today. I’ll think about that tomorrow. Tomorrow is another day!”
So, they are “pro-choice,” but not “pro-informed-choice.”
Ignorance is bliss, which also explains the effectiveness of their teaching methods.
The Battle of Midway was a turning point in the Pacific Theater of WWII. It was indeed a victory, but the war was far from over. There was a tremendous amount of bloodshed still ahead.
The battle for Life had just been elevated to a new level, and a new kind of war is just beginning. This is phase II of the fight for Life.
Fasten your seatbelt.
The tragedy is that we see it as a battle for life and death, and they see it as a battle for convenience and self-indulgence. It has nothing to do with rights. Thanks, BJ.
It didn’t ban any abortions. Technically it left open that states could restrict abortion after viability, but if I’m not mistaken, the jurisprudence that developed thereafter made it effectively impossible to do so. As a result, attempts to outlaw late term abortions were routinely overturned. Abortion on demand until the moment of birth has been the law of the land. There was no point in trying to restrict even only late term abortions, because the same legal precedent that governed early term abortions governed all others.
Until now. By sweeping away Roe and all post Roe restrictions on state abortion limits, I think we may very well eventually see many states that aren’t among the 26 that are about to restrict it actually enact some restrictions themselves, even if only on late term abortions. This will depend upon robust pro-life lobbying and education. In the end, how do you defend late term elective abortion? You can’t. And if we keep driving it home, eventually I think restrictions on it might happen in a large majority of states.
They were “hiding” the issue of late term abortions behind the legal precedent that governed all abortions. The accusation was that to attack one type of abortion was to attack Roe itself and thereby undermine all. Now that Roe is gone, late term abortions can be focused upon without that type of obfuscation.
I do wonder if conservatives have the patience to do the irritatingly hard work of winning over agnostics (for starters) and eventually pro-abortion citizens one by one. It’s a guttery job, at least that’s been my experience. On the other hand I didn’t feel so good when I cast my first vote for Donald Trump, but sometimes the nasty fight has to happen now.
Maybe it was imprudent. Cat’s outta the bag, though. Let’s just be sure to win.
I had absolutely no qualms about voting against Felony. It was similar to what Dennis Prager says about administering capital punishment to a heinous murderer and then going out afterward for a nice mutton, lettuce, and tomato sandwich. . .
Fantastic comments!
The difference is now they must argue with reason to defend killing for convenience.
I am willing to bet they will win. There will always be those who can’t be won over.
True but now that it is a live issue rather than one being controlled by the court the fight won’t end. The prolife side will win some victories the proabort side will win others, but neither sides victories will be permanent. We’ll still have to persuade and keep working at the law until we come to a stable equilibrium or technology takes the question out of our hands entirely.
True, but I only have to fight in my Bible Belt state. California can’t impose its evil on us.
I hope not. There are some who will try to go down the National standard route. I don’t think they will have the support at this juncture but we’ll need to be on the lookout for that. I could easily see feckless Republicans convincing themselves they need to “do something” again. I thought they had learned their lesson about trusting the media, but apparently the are willfully unteachable on this subject. It isn’t clear that would be constitutional but the Supreme Court might not have the appetite for going at that again so soon.