Thank You, Peggy Noonan

 

I had just wandered through a generally so-so observation about patrician and plebeian elements in our present political situation. I was not sure that I had made my points clear enough for the normal pleb to grasp fully (we are generally too preoccupied with life’s minor distractions such as rent, food, and selecting the right brand of beer).

But one can always count on their betters to provide. So Peggy Noonan was kind enough to write a Wall Street Journal piece that explains it much better than I. She, of course, is an established member of the GOP Order of Patricians and her concern was about the unwashed plebs generally known as Trump voters. Hope among her fellow elitists was that more and more of this group would abandon the notion of the former president seeking the office again in 2024, that support for him would fade and he would pass from the public’s eye. As it is turning out, that simply isn’t happening. In fact, it appears to some that their numbers might even be growing.

This is so despite the continuous dumping on the former president. Or maybe even because of it. The latest anti-Trump production is turning into a huge disappointment. It actually seems to have the opposite effect intended. Interest in the show trial sometimes called the J6 hearings has been weak and far below what was hoped for. In fact, it is probably having the opposite effect. Only the most gullible or pre-disposed believe in them and for the rest they are far too transparent. For most, they leave the distinct impression of Star Chamber episodes intended not to learn anything but to influence an election by removing a leading candidate. Plebs must be protected from their limited intellects by narrowing their choices to only acceptable options.

In any case, Trump is actually increasing in support from this sideshow. So a fresh approach in pleb management has shown its face recently. That is to agree that the plebs do have some real concerns and that maybe the down and dirty Trump demeanor helped to create attention for them. But now he has served his purpose and it is time for candidates with smoother edges to carry the banner. For the moment, they are even willing to accept some candidates who might be a little “Trumpy” themselves as long as they are not the original. For the moment, that is.

But in the end, the real call will be for “reasonable” candidates who can hopefully worm their way into those “purple” vote without really confronting the matters that will change us as a nation and having to win a thoughtful and passionate argument for Liberty. You know, the kind of candidates who made Trump possible in 2016, the kind who knows in his (or hers, or …..) heart that something can be worked out to get us by if the patricians were left to bargain among themselves.

Noonan knows enough to begin every con job with a compliment, sort of. She is impressed that every Trump voter does love America even if it is “not always been a fully thought-through love but it’s generally fully felt”. She even concedes that this is “admirable”, even if the thought process was so incomplete. So plebeian. If it got any more simple-minded, it would be on my level.

A little deeper into the piece one is able to get a clearer picture of the patrician view of those millions upon millions of the GOP base who are so regularly called on by the party elites but rarely listened to. She tries to reinforce the Dem contention that Trump was told by all reasonable and sane people that the 2020 election was fair and square but he chose to listen instead to a collection of “kooks, crooks and freaks” which was not hard to find since “Trumpworld has more than most”.

Her appeal to wayward plebs is to drop Trump or lose the shining chance to dominate in the coming elections. Everything is so very bad that just about any Republican will surely win. Any except, of course, Trump. “Only Trump” would lose.

But the truth is as soon as Trump can be eliminated, the patricians will begin to try and thin out any of the other non-conformists with plebeian tendencies. Before the discussion is over they will hope to be back to the old standard GOP patrician because they could win “in the middle”. You know, that legendary middle where gun rights can be narrowed, where new entitlements have been created, where “comprehensive” immigration reform lives, where government dollars represent educational concern, where … Oh, hell my simple mind and stubby fingers are over-loaded … You can fill in the rest.

What is so desperately needed is a clear, objective American agenda for all, with disregard for who you are speaking to. The principles of the Founding and the principles which build successful lives will reach all levels of society.

The great swath of middle America that I have spoken of very much feels the loss of our Constitution even if the patricians don’t. The party elites have yet to realize that MAGA is not a Trump thing. It is a grassroots American plebeian thing. Trump simply put a slogan behind it and then did his best to implement it.

The Peggy Noonans still talk and act as if this was about a loose-mouthed billionaire and not the saving of the republic as founded. But they do sense the shift away from them and that is what they hate, what they fight against. If Trump is at the head of the column or not is hardly the central question. The real question is the uncompromising direction of the column.

We might be in a dangerous position with our future but more and more I believe that the people who will make the long-term difference have finally realized that the damage done to us by the “warriors” on their side, it is not near the problem as the damage done by the cowards and blinded on ours. Hopefully, Noonan will save her condescension for her own kind.

By the way, if any of you fellow plebs actually want to read the Noonan column you will find it behind a paywall. Unless you have the devious computer skills to bypass “the wall”, you will have to take my word for the content of the piece. Otherwise, you can join me in some simple plebeian pleasure as I take off these smelly socks, let the air hit these more than smelly feet, pour three, possibly four fingers in a cup, and soak up the quiet of an evening that has finally begun to cool.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 375 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

     

     

    Both of them used to work at NR. 

    • #361
  2. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    My colleague Joe Cunningham reported on some of the unhinged reactions from the peanut gallery including Keith Olbermann, former acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal, and former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. Bharara said, “SCOTUS read neither the room nor the Constitution correctly.” Funny, and perhaps telling that he doesn’t understand that the Court isn’t supposed to be ‘reading the room’ but deciding purely on the Constitution no matter what the ‘room’ says.

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/06/23/dems-lose-their-minds-doj-makes-concerning-statement-on-scotus-gun-rights-decision-n582973

     

     

    Hey Dems, we have this codified today because the fools in NY didn’t know when to stop pushing left and be happy with what they had. Everyone on our side, thank NY profusely on social media. Schadenfreude. 

    • #362
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    This is a pretty good example of what I have been talking about. lol 

     

     

     

     

    • #363
  4. DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Didn’t French write some silly little article in 2020 about how Presidents couldn’t really do anything about abortion, so it was okay to vote for pro-abortion candidates like JOE BIDEN.

    Today he celebrates a victory that wouldn’t have happened if we’d listened to him back in 2016 and elected Hillary.

    • #364
  5. DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    The best part is that all the lefty followers David French gained for his anti-Trumpism are now screaming at him about their rights being taken away. While the remaining righty followers he has remind him that he opposed the President who made this happen.

    This is what happens when you’re a traitor. Nobody likes you.

    • #365
  6. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):
    Didn’t French write some silly little article in 2020 about how Presidents couldn’t really do anything about abortion, so it was okay to vote for pro-abortion candidates like JOE BIDEN.

    This kind of thinking is very, very flawed. They don’t understand how anything works today. They think it’s the 70s when the Democrat party wasn’t so nuts. etc.

    • #366
  7. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):
    Didn’t French write some silly little article in 2020 about how Presidents couldn’t really do anything about abortion, so it was okay to vote for pro-abortion candidates like JOE BIDEN.

    This kind of thinking is very, very flawed. They don’t understand how anything works today. They think it’s the 70s when the Democrat party wasn’t so nuts. etc.

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either. 

    • #367
  8. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):
    Didn’t French write some silly little article in 2020 about how Presidents couldn’t really do anything about abortion, so it was okay to vote for pro-abortion candidates like JOE BIDEN.

    This kind of thinking is very, very flawed. They don’t understand how anything works today. They think it’s the 70s when the Democrat party wasn’t so nuts. etc.

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either.

    I wish somebody would write a book about Reagan and Friedrich Hayek as analysis over time. Everything these people have in their heads is wrong. 

    Nobody will do this, but check out the long David Stockman interview on real vision. I think it is out of the pay wall.  Seriously how many things is he wrong on? There is a transcript.

    • #368
  9. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):
    Didn’t French write some silly little article in 2020 about how Presidents couldn’t really do anything about abortion, so it was okay to vote for pro-abortion candidates like JOE BIDEN.

    This kind of thinking is very, very flawed. They don’t understand how anything works today. They think it’s the 70s when the Democrat party wasn’t so nuts. etc.

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either.

    Reagan’s VP.

    • #369
  10. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Look at this. Is it really worth it to enable Democrats?

     

     

    His old lady has made millions off of advising Bernie Sanders. 

    • #370
  11. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):
    Didn’t French write some silly little article in 2020 about how Presidents couldn’t really do anything about abortion, so it was okay to vote for pro-abortion candidates like JOE BIDEN.

    This kind of thinking is very, very flawed. They don’t understand how anything works today. They think it’s the 70s when the Democrat party wasn’t so nuts. etc.

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either.

    Reagan’s VP.

    They got rid of Paul Volker. Why would you do this? Kellyanne Conway discussed this at length recently. It might have been the Newt Gingrich podcast. Those guys were terrible.

    • #371
  12. Chris O Coolidge
    Chris O
    @ChrisO

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either.

    Reagan’s VP.

    Originator of the “voodoo economics” epithet.

    • #372
  13. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Chris O (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either.

    Reagan’s VP.

    Originator of the “voodoo economics” epithet.

    And “new world order” when he became POTUS.

    • #373
  14. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Chris O (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either.

    Reagan’s VP.

    Originator of the “voodoo economics” epithet.

    And “new world order” when he became POTUS.

    And “kinder, gentler conservatism”. What a gem. 

    • #374
  15. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Chris O (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    So true! Same with people who claim to be “Reagan Republicans” and oppose Trump. Not only are they living in a different country (reality), they don’t seem to know who Reagan was to the conservative movement. You might even call him an “Ultra MAGA” Republican and anti-GOPe. Like Trump, the establishment at the time didn’t care much for Reagan either.

    Reagan’s VP.

    Originator of the “voodoo economics” epithet.

    And “new world order” when he became POTUS.

    And “kinder, gentler conservatism”. What a gem.

    And then “compassionate conservatism” from his son, George W. Bush.

    • #375
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.