Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
‘Fort Pelosi’ Hits Rock Bottom
As an 18-year-old high school graduate a couple of weeks from starting college, I remember holding the microphone from my cassette recorder to my parent’s stereo in our small Oklahoma town to record President Richard Nixon’s August 8 resignation address to the nation.
Afterward, I stepped outside our home’s front door, gazing upward towards the cloudless blue sky on a beautiful summer evening to let the history of that moment settle in. I still have that cassette tape. I can still quote key phrases from the speech from memory. I had just made my first trip to Washington a month earlier, on my way to Canada as part of an International Air Cadet Exchange Program. I’d seen how the final throes of Watergate had gripped the nation’s capital. Tumultuous times.
For two years, America would slowly become gripped in the drama that began with a “third-rate burglary” at Washington’s Watergate complex into gripping Senate hearings led by Democrat Sam Ervin (D-NC), along with ranking Republican Howard Baker (R-TN). Lead counsels Sam Dash (Democrat) and Fred Thompson (Republican) became household names. One later became a famous actor and US Senator. I recall watching the House Judiciary Committee’s dramatic roll call vote on three articles of impeachment. A future boss, then-freshman Rep. Trent Lott (R-MS), voted no on all three articles. Nixon, of course, chose to resign instead of facing certain votes for impeachment and conviction. He, again, spared the nation a prolonged crisis.
I sure hope it happens, either without cheating or with a margin wide enough to overcome expected cheating.
Please correct your designation of Rep. Schiff as a Republican (shudder).
Excellent synopsis. Not only should Schiff be stripped of his committee assignments, so should Swalwell and the entire Squad.
As to the red wave, I will take special joy if the current Rep for my old district in WA state, Kim Schrier, is defeated. She is a useless Pelosi acolyte. That now-purple district is on the target list for both parties.
Anyone with half a brain should have a lot of questions about these:
And, as I have said before, the same people who have tracked down anyone who so much as farted on Capitol grounds on 1/6 cannot seem to hunt down this guy who made sure to get captured by as many cameras in the area as possible and talked on his cell phone while doing it:
A whole lot of dishonesty going on here and they don’t even care to hide it anymore.
OMG that is a horrific error. Fixed.
What the heck, I’ll toss this in again:
The most discouraging words in your post are “Speaker Kevin McCarthy.”
@Barfly, any idea who should take on the job? Really needs to be someone more aggressive and much better at handling the media (a la DeSantis).
T R U M . . .
Well, SotH DJT would certainly be more aggressive and better at media relations. He’s not a good judge of people, and probably not good at herding Congressmen. What about Jim Jordan?
Kinda neat that we take the idea seriously. So many impossible things have happened in the last two years, that maybe one more …
The GOP should hang the whole J6 mess on Pelosi.
If she makes it to Congress, how about Sarah Palin for Speaker? As payback for the disgusting treatment she got while running with McCain for VP.
And the real “purpose” of the J6 Star Chamber was, and is, to get Donald Trump, and put him and anyone close to him out of action for good.
And the best part would be, after impeaching Biden and Harris, wouldn’t Trump become POTUS?
She has the brass.
It would be nice if Palin got to VP or even POTUS but a shame that McCain isn’t still around to be humiliated by it.
Well first, it’s not a trial.
Andy McCarthy of National Review did point out that what the committee is missing is cross examination, and the result is that the equivalent of defense lawyers in these type proceedings is missing. In other words is not our traditional adversarial system that most congressional commitee investigations do observe.
A Stalinist show trial generally ends with the defendent (and there is no defendent attending this select committee) confessing — perhaps after being tortured, his family being threatened, or both — at which point he’s taken to a jail cell where an execution takes place with a bullet to the head.
This isn’t a Stalinist show trial.
It’s not even a show trial.
It’s just a show.
And it’s a waste of time for the people on it, because it won’t have its intended affect in the end. There won’t even be a trial, at least not with Donald Trump as the defendent.
“a modicum of gravity and due process” – surely you mean “model”, here.
I don’t think there is any moral equivalence between the actions of protestors on Jan 6th and the actions of the committee members and staff: the latter are clearly worse. While the people involved in the former are accountable to the most powerful (and, it would seem, uncontrollable) force the world has ever known – the US executive branch (and a complicit DC judiciary) – the latter have legal and, in this world of gerrymandered districts, electoral, impunity. The most violent protestors availed themselves of zip ties and pepper spray. The committee has the limitless resources of the state at its unaccountable beck and call and does not hesitate to wield them against its political enemies. The protestors were open, if possibly confused, about their motives – to right a perceived wrong. The committee lies and lies and lies. And through their lies they corrupt. The protestors inflicted, at most, a scratch on the body politic. The committee is a cancer.
Eww, “the committee.”
Ever seen “A Boy And His Dog?”
“A young man and his telepathic dog wander a post-apocalyptic wasteland.” “[A]n R-Rated rather kinky story of survival.” No. But I’m keen to learn what “the committee” is.
The committee was like McGoohan’s “The Village” but they wanted something other than information to be extracted from captive young men.
A few places on youtube appear to offer it for free.
The only Democrats I know are going to vote against any Republican. The folks in charge will arrange massive cheating. They got away with it and were exonerated without serious investigation. I think we have to be prepared for a stolen election and deal with it. Trump has to be free to run then toss his support to one or more of the excellent candidates so his strong supporters vote. Not because he couldn’t win, but because it makes cheating easier to accept from Democrats and some pretend Republicans. It will not be an easy win. The Texas win was for a few months and they’ll have learned form it. These people are totalitarian and nothing embarrasses them. By Presidential election time the military will be prepared to deal with the military split necessary to pull states and pieces of states to form a new Republic. Failing that it’s over. The Chinese will guarantee it even if some begin to drift. We’ll know in November.
“Due process violations are highlighted by a House Speaker’s historic refusal to allow the minority to choose their members and staff of the Special “J6” Committee”
I believe that Kevin McCarthy was offered 5 seats on the Committee but three of them were rejected as people that voted to deny the election results so he took his ball and went home refusing to name any replacements. So the lack of meaningful opposition is entirely his fault.
Here in South Carolina, I saw a lot of McCain/Palin bumper stickers with the McCain portion ripped off . . .
I agree with this. Newt Gingerich is too smart to actually believe the bit of hyperbole about a “Stalinist show trial”.
I read the Harlan Ellison story and watched the Don Johnson movie. Johnson was very young at the time. It was playing as a midnight movie in Orlando while I was in Nuke school
Wrong!
Goose, gander. I recall Sen Boxer and Rep Tubbs Jones becoming pariahs after this. Not.
Speaking to the serious of this, I remember an interview with a freshman member of that Judiciary Committee after Trump’s first impeachment. He said that within three hours of the articles being passed they walked them over to the Senate. Pelosi sat on hers for how long? There was no serious attempt to remove Trump. Like these hearings, it’s all for show.
I agree completely. Pelosi thought (I believe incorrectly) the Democrats’ self-interest was best served by keeping DJT front and center for as long as possible. She had no incentive to send over articles that would ultimately lead to an acquittal ending the matter.