Quote of the Day: Fiat Money

 

No, not THAT Fiat!

The title of the article in Friday’s Wall Street Journal is “Fed Begins Shrinking $8.9 Trillion Portfolio.” The article is a series of questions and answers about how the Federal Reserve will shrink its portfolio of mortgage-backed securities it bought in 2020 “to stabilize dysfunctional markets.” This particular section was quite enlightening:

Q:  What does the Fed do with the money it gets from the payment of principal on its holdings?

A:  The Fed essentially created money out of thin air to buy the bonds. Now, it will destroy the money in the same way.

When private investors buy bonds, they use cash, borrow funds or sell assets to raise the money to make that purchase. The Fed is different. It doesn’t have to do any of those things because it can electronically credit money to the accounts of bond dealers who sell mortgage-backed securities or Treasurys.

When the Fed purchases a security, it creates a bank deposit known as a reserve that shows up in the account of the seller. When the process is reversed, instead of reinvesting the proceeds of maturing bonds, the Fed erases them electronically. It doesn’t print currency to purchase the bonds, and so it won’t be destroying any paper currency. The electronic money essentially vanishes from the financial system.

The New York Fed provides a detailed breakdown of the accounting on its Liberty Street Economics blog.

If you really think this through, it can be horrifying. The Fed waves its magic wand and “money” appears. It waves the magic wand again, and “money” disappears. To me, this is the best argument against the “cashless” society, since the government can make money disappear in an instant if it wishes. It also tells me that the Fed is backed by, essentially, nothing. If the government can create and destroy money, then none of the public’s funds are secure for a moment.

Published in Economics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 31 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    Percival (View Comment):

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Rufus: I highly recommend the Kellyanne Conway interview on Newt Gingrich. She was talking about how 41 got rid of all of Reagan’s people. Why would you get rid of Paul Volker?. That is ground zero.

    41 was the originator of a lot of our current intractable problems: selling out to China, a government run by the Elites, our current near bankruptcy, and giving away so much power to those behind the Great Reset, etc.

    Funny. The predominance of the evidence is that 41 was CIA. He’s never admitted it, that I know of.

    You mean other than being DCI for almost a year from 1976 to 1977?

    Yeah, before that.  Maybe “predominance of the evidence” was too strong.

    • #31
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.