Republicans Don’t Give a Damn About Americans

 

REPORT: The House could vote as soon as Tuesday night on a $40 billion package of military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine.

Trump wanted $4 billion for his Wall and the GOP couldn’t come up with it. The GOP has had massive power time and time again over the last 40 years and hasn’t secured our border. But they can get behind giving 10 times that amount to a country it isn’t in our interest to worry about.

Why don’t conservatives move as swiftly to stop the endless fentanyl killing Americans? The child molesters destroying our children? How about the murderers and gang members infesting our streets and terrorizing our communities? The GOP will win and they’ll do nothing to stop any of it but fundraise and beg for the White House. A curse on both parties. They’re all trash.

.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 347 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInWisconsin, Oik! Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik!
    @DrewInWisconsin

    • #211
  2. Dbroussa Coolidge
    Dbroussa
    @Dbroussa

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik! (View Comment):
    But hey, here’s the former RNC chair giving Democrats an assist with their latest jeremiad.

    He needs to keep that sinecure of his SiriusXM show which means he has moved far to the left…or he was just a token by the RNC because of his skin color…

    • #212
  3. Dbroussa Coolidge
    Dbroussa
    @Dbroussa

    BDB (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):
    Rick Perry, in 2012, said of those who criticized his policies for dreamers that they did not have a heart. There is a huge divide within the GOP on this issue.

    And that’s part of why he was not the nominee. There were other things, but I would call that the single biggest chunk.

    Which is sad because it would have gotten him out of the Governor’s mansion faster.

    This is the same guy who tried the appeal to emotion for his mandated STD vaccine for all kids in Texas.

    • #213
  4. Victor Tango Kilo Member
    Victor Tango Kilo
    @VtheK

    HeavyWater (View Comment):
    Rick Perry, in 2012, said of those who criticized his policies for dreamers that they did not have a heart.  There is a huge divide within the GOP on this issue.  

    And Jeb Bush said illegal immigration was an “act of love.” But my favorite part was Jeb’s insistence that we needed those hot, lusty illegal immigrants to keep the population numbers up.

    • #214
  5. HeavyWater Reagan
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Say what you want about Ukraine, but it does seem like a lot a people want Ukraine to win.  

    Czech President Milos Zeman has approved 103 Czechs for joining the Armed Forces of Ukraine.  

    You’ve got the Germans providing heavy weapons to Ukraine with the Green party as the hawkish party.  

    The Russian invasion of Ukraine has turned the foreign policies of multiple nations upside down.  

    • #215
  6. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):
    Rick Perry, in 2012, said of those who criticized his policies for dreamers that they did not have a heart. There is a huge divide within the GOP on this issue.

    And Jeb Bush said illegal immigration was an “act of love.” But my favorite part was Jeb’s insistence that we needed those hot, lusty illegal immigrants to keep the population numbers up.

    Which demonstrates that the party is not united on the issue of immigration, as Heavy Water pointed out earlier. And Democrats aren’t united on this issue either, though in general they are far more open to open borders than most Republicans.  Like it or not, it’s going to be hard to get anything done on immigration given how politicized the issue has become. The Left is reflexively anti-anything that Trump was in support of, and this of course applies to immigration.  Trump didn’t help matters by insulting and alienating Republicans who might have otherwise been brought on board. I know some of you just loved it when Trump would insult other Republicans, but that governing style, while no doubt emotionally satisfying to many of you, makes it harder to accomplish goals which require cooperation and persuasion.

    • #216
  7. Concretevol Thatcher
    Concretevol
    @Concretevol

    Wait…..I thought Mexico was paying for the wall…….

    • #217
  8. Concretevol Thatcher
    Concretevol
    @Concretevol

    Seriously this seems like the zero sum type of thinking that progressives use all the time.  IF WE PAY FOR BOMBS WE CANT HELP POOR PEOPLE!  I don’t see why continuing to fund Ukrainian resistance has any impact on fentanyl abuse or wall building.  You seriously think this is an either/or situation??  

    • #218
  9. DrewInWisconsin, Oik! Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik!
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Accusing people of being progressives because they are hesitant to fund another endless war is so Boomercon I just can’t even.

     

    • #219
  10. HeavyWater Reagan
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Concretevol (View Comment):

    Seriously this seems like the zero sum type of thinking that progressives use all the time. IF WE PAY FOR BOMBS WE CANT HELP POOR PEOPLE! I don’t see why continuing to fund Ukrainian resistance has any impact on fentanyl abuse or wall building. You seriously think this is an either/or situation??

    I’m not sure any government program can stop someone from using fentanyl if they are determined to abuse drugs like that.  

    Some people value short term pleasure over long term health.

    • #220
  11. HeavyWater Reagan
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    The Ukrainians are the ones doing the fighting and dying.  Providing military and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine is not only morally correct but it’s also in our national interest to see Putin defeated in his effort to subjugate Ukraine.  

    • #221
  12. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):

    Seriously this seems like the zero sum type of thinking that progressives use all the time. IF WE PAY FOR BOMBS WE CANT HELP POOR PEOPLE! I don’t see why continuing to fund Ukrainian resistance has any impact on fentanyl abuse or wall building. You seriously think this is an either/or situation??

    I’m not sure any government program can stop someone from using fentanyl if they are determined to abuse drugs like that.

    Some people value short term pleasure over long term health.

    You can’t be serious. The amount of fentanyl in the country is directly related to how uncontrolled the border is. 

    If you shut down the border you shut down the ones that are straight criminals that aren’t surrendering to border patrol. The got a ways. Got a ways are about 40% of whoever surrenders and lies about asylum. It’s insane. It’s like surrendering to criminals and funding cartels.

    You don’t want excess opioids anywhere. 

    • #222
  13. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

    Jodey Arrington of Texas

    Brian Babin of Texas

    Jim Banks of Indiana

    Andy Biggs of Arizona

    Gus Bilirakis of Florida

    Dan Bishop of North Carolina

    Lauren Boebert of Colorado

    Ken Buck of Colorado

    Tim Burchett of Tennessee

    Kat Cammack of Florida

    Mаdison Cаwthorn of North Cаrolinа

    Michаel Cloud of Texаs

    Andrew Clyde of Georgiа

    Jаmes Comer of Kentucky

    Wаrren Dаvidson of Ohio

    Scott DesJаrlаis of Tennessee

    Byron Donаlds of Floridа

    Jeff Duncаn of South Cаrolinа

    Ron Estes of Kаnsаs

    Russа Fulcher of Indiаnа

    Mаtt Gаetz of Floridа

    Bob Gibbs of Ohio

    Louie Gohmert of Texаs

    Bob Good of Virginiа

    Pаul Gosаr of Arizonа

    Gаrret Grаves of Louisiаnа

    Mаrjorie Tаylor Greene of Georgiа

    Diаnа Hаrshbаrger of Tennessee

    Vicky Hаrtzler of Missouri

    Kevin Hern of Oklаhomа

    Yvette Herrell of New Mexico

    Jody Hice of Georgiа

    Clаy Higgins of Louisiаnа

    Bill Huizengа of Michigаn

    Ronny Jаckson of Texаs

    Mike Johnson of Louisiаnа

    Jim Jordаn of Ohio

    Debbie Lesko of Arizonа

    Billy Long of Missouri

    Trаcey Mаnn of Kаnsаs

    Thomаs Mаssie of Kentucky

    Briаn Mаst of Floridа

    Mаry Miller of Illinois

    Bаrry Moore of Alаbаmа

    Troy Nehls of Texаs

    Rаlph Normаn of South Cаrolinа

    Scott Perry of Pennsylvаniа

    John Rose of Tennessee

    Mаtthew Rosendаle of Montаnа

    Chip Roy of Texаs

    Pete Sessions of Texаs

    Greg Steube of Floridа

    Tom Tiffаny of Wisconsin

    Jeff Vаn Drew of New Jersey

    Beth Vаn Duyne of Texаs

    Bruce Westermаn of Arkаnsаs

    Roger Williаms of Texаs.

    • #223
  14. DrewInWisconsin, Oik! Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik!
    @DrewInWisconsin

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    I’m not sure any government program can stop someone from using fentanyl if they are determined to abuse drugs like that.

    Some people value short term pleasure over long term health.

    You can’t be serious. The amount of fentanyl in the country is directly related to how uncontrolled the border is.

    Thank you. That comment had me grounding off another molar, and I can’t really lose any more.

     

    • #224
  15. HeavyWater Reagan
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):

    Seriously this seems like the zero sum type of thinking that progressives use all the time. IF WE PAY FOR BOMBS WE CANT HELP POOR PEOPLE! I don’t see why continuing to fund Ukrainian resistance has any impact on fentanyl abuse or wall building. You seriously think this is an either/or situation??

    I’m not sure any government program can stop someone from using fentanyl if they are determined to abuse drugs like that.

    Some people value short term pleasure over long term health.

    You can’t be serious. The amount of fentanyl in the country is directly related to how uncontrolled the border is.

    If you shut down the border you shut down the ones that are straight criminals that aren’t surrendering to border patrol. The got a ways. Got a ways are about 40% of whoever surrenders and lies about asylum. It’s insane. It’s like surrendering to criminals and funding cartels.

    You don’t want excess opioids anywhere.

    Even during prohibition people were able to obtain alcohol.  So, relying on the government to save you from your own decisions is always going to fail.  

    People know how harmful cigarettes are.  But a substantial number of people smoke cigarettes anyway.  

    No amount of big government is going to stop people from pursuing the pleasures associated with alcohol, drugs and tobacco.  

    • #225
  16. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    The thing about fentanyl is, the dealers recklessly lace it with things that kids think they can get away with popping like an oxy. It’s it’s more risk and it facilitates crime because it’s so easy to move powerful amounts.

    • #226
  17. HeavyWater Reagan
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

    Jodey Arrington of Texas

    Brian Babin of Texas

    Jim Banks of Indiana

    Andy Biggs of Arizona

    Gus Bilirakis of Florida

    Dan Bishop of North Carolina

    Lauren Boebert of Colorado

    Ken Buck of Colorado

    Tim Burchett of Tennessee

    Kat Cammack of Florida

    Mаdison Cаwthorn of North Cаrolinа

    Michаel Cloud of Texаs

    Andrew Clyde of Georgiа

    Jаmes Comer of Kentucky

    Wаrren Dаvidson of Ohio

    Scott DesJаrlаis of Tennessee

    Byron Donаlds of Floridа

    Jeff Duncаn of South Cаrolinа

    Ron Estes of Kаnsаs

    Russа Fulcher of Indiаnа

    Mаtt Gаetz of Floridа

    Bob Gibbs of Ohio

    Louie Gohmert of Texаs

    Bob Good of Virginiа

    Pаul Gosаr of Arizonа

    Gаrret Grаves of Louisiаnа

    Mаrjorie Tаylor Greene of Georgiа

    Diаnа Hаrshbаrger of Tennessee

    Vicky Hаrtzler of Missouri

    Kevin Hern of Oklаhomа

    Yvette Herrell of New Mexico

    Jody Hice of Georgiа

    Clаy Higgins of Louisiаnа

    Bill Huizengа of Michigаn

    Ronny Jаckson of Texаs

    Mike Johnson of Louisiаnа

    Jim Jordаn of Ohio

    Debbie Lesko of Arizonа

    Billy Long of Missouri

    Trаcey Mаnn of Kаnsаs

    Thomаs Mаssie of Kentucky

    Briаn Mаst of Floridа

    Mаry Miller of Illinois

    Bаrry Moore of Alаbаmа

    Troy Nehls of Texаs

    Rаlph Normаn of South Cаrolinа

    Scott Perry of Pennsylvаniа

    John Rose of Tennessee

    Mаtthew Rosendаle of Montаnа

    Chip Roy of Texаs

    Pete Sessions of Texаs

    Greg Steube of Floridа

    Tom Tiffаny of Wisconsin

    Jeff Vаn Drew of New Jersey

    Beth Vаn Duyne of Texаs

    Bruce Westermаn of Arkаnsаs

    Roger Williаms of Texаs.

    I would not vote for any of them.  

    • #227
  18. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

     

    I would not vote for any of them.

    Why is that?

     

    • #228
  19. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):

    Seriously this seems like the zero sum type of thinking that progressives use all the time. IF WE PAY FOR BOMBS WE CANT HELP POOR PEOPLE! I don’t see why continuing to fund Ukrainian resistance has any impact on fentanyl abuse or wall building. You seriously think this is an either/or situation??

    I’m not sure any government program can stop someone from using fentanyl if they are determined to abuse drugs like that.

    Some people value short term pleasure over long term health.

    You can’t be serious. The amount of fentanyl in the country is directly related to how uncontrolled the border is.

    If you shut down the border you shut down the ones that are straight criminals that aren’t surrendering to border patrol. The got a ways. Got a ways are about 40% of whoever surrenders and lies about asylum. It’s insane. It’s like surrendering to criminals and funding cartels.

    You don’t want excess opioids anywhere.

    Even during prohibition people were able to obtain alcohol. So, relying on the government to save you from your own decisions is always going to fail.

    People know how harmful cigarettes are. But a substantial number of people smoke cigarettes anyway.

    No amount of big government is going to stop people from pursuing the pleasures associated with alcohol, drugs and tobacco.

    You need to raise the price. You need to limit the distribution. You are funding crime. Also, it’s frequently laced in things that people buy on the street and then it kills them. It  compounds problems over ordinary hard drugs. It’s easier to move powerful amounts. If you control the border you are going to use fewer resources for hard drug enforcement. 

    I was on Demerol for 24 hours years ago and oh my God. I can’t believe people play with that crap, but fentanyl adds another risk. 

    • #229
  20. HeavyWater Reagan
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

    I would not vote for any of them.

    Why is that?

    I support military aid to Ukraine.  If a US Congressman or US Senator does not support such aid, I will not vote for that person.  It doesn’t matter what their political party affiliation is or how good they are on other issues.  If they get that issue wrong, I won’t vote for that person.

    • #230
  21. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

    I would not vote for any of them.

    Why is that?

    I support military aid to Ukraine. If a US Congressman or US Senator does not support such aid, I will not vote for that person. It doesn’t matter what their political party affiliation is or how good they are on other issues. If they get that issue wrong, I won’t vote for that person.

    OK, you’re a single issue voter.  Nothing wrong with that.

    Apparently the ridiculous amount of the aid against the multiple domestic issues isn’t a concern.

    • #231
  22. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I had never thought of that rhetoric before. Fentanyl compounds all kinds of problems and all kinds of risks. I get that people aren’t sympathetic to people that fool around with hard drugs, but it chews up resources like nothing else they have to police and clean up after. 

    • #232
  23. HeavyWater Reagan
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

    I would not vote for any of them.

    Why is that?

    I support military aid to Ukraine. If a US Congressman or US Senator does not support such aid, I will not vote for that person. It doesn’t matter what their political party affiliation is or how good they are on other issues. If they get that issue wrong, I won’t vote for that person.

    OK, you’re a single issue voter. Nothing wrong with that.

    Apparently the ridiculous amount of the aid against the multiple domestic issues isn’t a concern.

    There are many issues I care about.  

    But if a member of Congress fails to vote for aid to Ukraine at a time when Ukraine is in a desperate struggle against Putin’s tyrannical plans, I will not support that member of Congress.  

    Those members of Congress that you listed have unwittingly allied themselves with Putin.  They can not have my support.  

    • #233
  24. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    philo (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    Here we are, 158 comments in, and not a single person, not even the Republican apologists, is countering the thesis of the OP by trying to make the case that, “Republicans actually do care about Americans.”

    Says a lot when even Republican fan-boys accept the premise.

    Probably because most conservatives look at politicians “caring” about them rather differently than do liberals. A good example being a presidential debate or town hall event some years ago (I forget the year) in which a guy in the audience asked how the candidates were going to be a “father” to him. Most conservatives hearing that were repulsed at the question.

    I don’t need politicians to “care” about me. I need politicians who will enact policies that promote individual and collective thriving. What I think those policies ought to be might not be the same as what you think. If a politician or party doesn’t do exactly what you want, I think it’s childish to then whine, “they don’t care about me”!

    Great point. Leaders are supposed to lead, not follow.

    The voters can choose new leaders if they don’t think they are being lead in the right direction.

    The misuse of the term “leader” in both industry and government where the word “manager” is actually appropriate is rampant these days…especially in reference to the DC crowd. There is a huge difference between the two types of beings and the popularity contests as presented to the voters by the know nothing media types does not serve us well.

    I do like the term leader.  Some people are born leaders.  Shackleton was a leader.  Leaders get you where you want to go, and lead by acclamation.  Could a manager have saved the crew of the Endurance?  Was Merkel a manager or a leader?  Could she have saved the Endurance?

    Trump’s a leader.  I think he had the internals to save the Endurance.  Is McConnell a leader, or a wheeler and dealer?  He could have sold the boat at salvage, I suppose, and gotten a good price.

    • #234
  25. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):

    Seriously this seems like the zero sum type of thinking that progressives use all the time. IF WE PAY FOR BOMBS WE CANT HELP POOR PEOPLE! I don’t see why continuing to fund Ukrainian resistance has any impact on fentanyl abuse or wall building. You seriously think this is an either/or situation??

    I’m not sure any government program can stop someone from using fentanyl if they are determined to abuse drugs like that.

    Some people value short term pleasure over long term health.

    You can’t be serious. The amount of fentanyl in the country is directly related to how uncontrolled the border is.

    If you shut down the border you shut down the ones that are straight criminals that aren’t surrendering to border patrol. The got a ways. Got a ways are about 40% of whoever surrenders and lies about asylum. It’s insane. It’s like surrendering to criminals and funding cartels.

    You don’t want excess opioids anywhere.

    The availability of fentanyl does not, in fact, dictate its use. What dictates its use is the desire to feel its effects despite its known dangers. Changing the minds of people who desire that short-term pleasure is not one that the government is likely to be effective at, though I can see boatloads of money going there anyway.  I think churches are likely to be more effective.

    Fentanyl could be dumped in quantity on my doorstep, but I wouldn’t take it even though it would be available.

    Of course I’d like to see our borders secured, for many reasons, but I don’t see it happening because it would require bi-partisan support or at least a de-politicization of the issue.

    • #235
  26. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):

    Seriously this seems like the zero sum type of thinking that progressives use all the time. IF WE PAY FOR BOMBS WE CANT HELP POOR PEOPLE! I don’t see why continuing to fund Ukrainian resistance has any impact on fentanyl abuse or wall building. You seriously think this is an either/or situation??

    I’m not sure any government program can stop someone from using fentanyl if they are determined to abuse drugs like that.

    Some people value short term pleasure over long term health.

    You can’t be serious. The amount of fentanyl in the country is directly related to how uncontrolled the border is.

    If you shut down the border you shut down the ones that are straight criminals that aren’t surrendering to border patrol. The got a ways. Got a ways are about 40% of whoever surrenders and lies about asylum. It’s insane. It’s like surrendering to criminals and funding cartels.

    You don’t want excess opioids anywhere.

    The availability of fentanyl does not, in fact, dictate its use. What dictates its use is the desire to feel its effects despite its known dangers. Changing the minds of people who desire that short-term pleasure is not one that the government is likely to be effective at, though I can see boatloads of money going there anyway. I think churches are likely to be more effective.

    Fentanyl could be dumped in quantity on my doorstep, but I wouldn’t take it even though it would be available.

    People want hard drugs. There is no reason to compound it with fentanyl, especially the way we are doing it. Close the border like any ordinary person with a brain would expect.

    • #236
  27. DrewInWisconsin, Oik! Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik!
    @DrewInWisconsin

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    There are many issues I care about.

    But the struggles facing the working class are not among them.

    • #237
  28. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

    I would not vote for any of them.

    Why is that?

    I support military aid to Ukraine. If a US Congressman or US Senator does not support such aid, I will not vote for that person. It doesn’t matter what their political party affiliation is or how good they are on other issues. If they get that issue wrong, I won’t vote for that person.

    OK, you’re a single issue voter. Nothing wrong with that.

    Apparently the ridiculous amount of the aid against the multiple domestic issues isn’t a concern.

    There are many issues I care about.

    But if a member of Congress fails to vote for aid to Ukraine at a time when Ukraine is in a desperate struggle against Putin’s tyrannical plans, I will not support that member of Congress.

    Those members of Congress that you listed have unwittingly allied themselves with Putin. They can not have my support.

    You skipped over my last point, but I assume if the aid was for less–say a piddling 10 billion–some or many of them would have cast a different vote.  See, you seem unable to realize that the amount matters and are stuck on “aid.”

    • #238
  29. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I realize that it’s easier and more fun to tar everyone with the same brush, but here’s a list of the 57 Republicans who voted against aid to Ukraine.

    I would not vote for any of them.

    Why is that?

    I support military aid to Ukraine. If a US Congressman or US Senator does not support such aid, I will not vote for that person. It doesn’t matter what their political party affiliation is or how good they are on other issues. If they get that issue wrong, I won’t vote for that person.

    OK, you’re a single issue voter. Nothing wrong with that.

    Apparently the ridiculous amount of the aid against the multiple domestic issues isn’t a concern.

    I’d be a lot happier with the amount if I had any confidence that its management was in competent hands.  I am fairly certain that at least some will be helpful to the Ukrainians and I am in favor of helping them, but given the incompetence of this administration I expect waste and possibly worse.

    • #239
  30. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):
    There’s only one way to change things. Vote in November.

    Yeah, trust that this time Republicans will change things; unlike the last ten times.

    One of these days Lucy’s going to hold the football. I just know it.

    • #240
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.