Dude Isn’t Just Wrong, He’s Evil

 

It’s long been said that the Left believes the Right is evil and the Right believes the Left is just wrong. Well, I’m over that. Joe Biden is evil and he’s the head of the party of evil. The Democrat party is historically the party of slavery and currently the party of racism (disguised as anti-racism) and murder. Yes, Joe Biden said the quiet part out loud (h/t Robert Spencer at PJMedia):

“The idea that we’re gonna make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the judgment to choose to abort a child based on a decision by the Supreme Court I think goes way overboard.”

Abort not just a clump of cells, but an actual, living “child.” That’s the only truthful part of the statement. The rest is just a Big, Huge Lie, since overturning Roe will not outlaw abortion, but will return the decision to the states, where it started pre-Roe and where it belongs. New York City can continue its genocidal abortion of more black babies than are born, Colorado will allow you to kill your child at the point of crowning, and California can pay to fly you in from another state to abort, abort, abort. If that’s not evil, I don’t know what is.

But, Biden gets worse. He tells an even bigger lie, if possible, about the historical view of religions toward abortion:

“Look, think what Roe says. Roe says what all basic mainstream religions have historically concluded — that the right — that the existence of a human life and being is a question. Is it at the moment of conception? Is it six months? Is it six weeks?”

First off, could he be more incoherent and dishonest? Mainstream religions have concluded that the start of human life is inconclusive? And that’s why we should be allowed to kill children? Because we don’t know when life begins? Wouldn’t that mean, ethically, since we don’t know, we should err on the side of caution and not kill children at any stage of development??

And secondly, the Catholic church — Joe Biden’s church! — couldn’t be more clear conclusive. Life begins at conception (it’s science, duh!) and must be protected from conception until natural death. The Left will surely take to the streets in the coming days and weeks, but I can tell you, the scandal in the Catholic church will be momentous if the bishops don’t have a serious response to this. I will join my fellow Catholics camping outside the chanceries of our dioceses in protest until the bishops make clear that Joe Biden’s position is anathema to Catholics, both historically and in the present, because it is the longstanding teaching of the church established by Christ that “thou shalt not murder.” Joe’s position is, in fact, mortal sin. It is soul-killing. This is literally what excommunication is for –“to awaken an individual’s conscience to repentance” (canon 1312 & 1331).

Get on it, your excellencies. Joe Biden better not be receiving communion this Sunday. Our Lord is too precious to be so defiled and we won’t stand for it after these vile, scandalous statements.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 92 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Ray Kujawa Coolidge
    Ray Kujawa
    @RayKujawa

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    jaWes (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist:

    Abort not just a clump of cells, but an actual, living “child.”

    but will return the decision to the states, where it started pre-Roe and where it belongs.

    Can you please explain the logic here? If the fetus is a child with all the inalienable rights of a born child, then why does the question of abortion belong with the states? It’s okay for California to deny the right to life of a child?

     

    Right. I in no way intend to defend even the states allowing for abortion, which is why I gave the examples I did. But, I’m a realist about this. There was legal (not moral) abortion before Roe and there will be legal (not moral) abortion after Roe. That’s our (ostensible) system of federalism. I pray that some day, governments at all levels everywhere in the world will choose to protect human life from conception to natural death, but it would take a miracle to get there from where we are today. In the meantime, we do what’s possible, including materially support women in tough situations who choose life, pray, sidewalk counsel outside abortion clinics, and did I mention pray, among other things like praying?

    Among things that are possible, it might be necessary to go out of state to birth a child if the intent is to give the child up for adoption. This isn’t solely to protect the baby. SC has some laws that protect the baby from being claimed by the out-of-wedlock and abusive father that WA state does not. This can be extremely helpful in association with abusive relationships.

    • #91
  2. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Ray Kujawa (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    jaWes (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist:

    Abort not just a clump of cells, but an actual, living “child.”

    but will return the decision to the states, where it started pre-Roe and where it belongs.

    Can you please explain the logic here? If the fetus is a child with all the inalienable rights of a born child, then why does the question of abortion belong with the states? It’s okay for California to deny the right to life of a child?

     

    Right. I in no way intend to defend even the states allowing for abortion, which is why I gave the examples I did. But, I’m a realist about this. There was legal (not moral) abortion before Roe and there will be legal (not moral) abortion after Roe. That’s our (ostensible) system of federalism. I pray that some day, governments at all levels everywhere in the world will choose to protect human life from conception to natural death, but it would take a miracle to get there from where we are today. In the meantime, we do what’s possible, including materially support women in tough situations who choose life, pray, sidewalk counsel outside abortion clinics, and did I mention pray, among other things like praying?

    Among things that are possible, it might be necessary to go out of state to birth a child if the intent is to give the child up for adoption. This isn’t solely to protect the baby. SC has some laws that protect the baby from being claimed by the out-of-wedlock and abusive father that WA state does not. This can be extremely helpful in association with abusive relationships.

    Since the left believes white people today are guilty for the sins of white Dem slave holders 150+ years ago, it is time do pull an Alinsky and use their collective guilt theory against them. It is time for the verbal backlash against them for the collective guilt we must be a part of per their critical theory rules and treat them with all the loathing one deserves for dragging us into their collective guilt sin. 

    • #92
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.