Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Quote of the Day: Conspiracy or Incompetence?
“Whenever you’re faced with an explanation of what’s going on in Washington, the choice between incompetence and conspiracy, always choose incompetence.” — Charles Krauthammer
I still miss him. Charles Krauthammer was able to observe the political landscape with savvy and insight, and often nailed the Washington scene accordingly. But when I read this quotation, I wondered if Charles would make the same observation, given the events of the last five to ten years.
I think today he would come to a different conclusion.
Instead, he would likely say that rather than choose between incompetence and conspiracy, an astute observer would need to say that both incompetence and conspiracy apply.
A person wouldn’t have to go far to recognize that several events, to be described accurately, would include both attributes:
- The Russian hoax—clearly the plans of the FBI were insidious and lawless—a conspiracy extraordinaire—but the sloppiness of their efforts has also damaged the agency’s reputation forever.
- Hillary’s efforts to take down Trump were baked into the conspiracy pie, and her explanation for covering her deletion of 30,000 emails was laughable.
- The Great Reset continues to proceed in the background, with the international set conspiring with our own elites(so to speak), already wreaking havoc on our economy.
- Modern monetary theory (MMT) is lauded as the most progressive approach to managing the economy, defying reason and common sense, while its proponents continue to defend it with misguided hopes, expectations, and dreams.
- Marxism is raising its ugly head again (called only “socialism”), pushed by the elites in their attempt to control society, while choosing to ignore the disastrous results of the Marxist agenda in the past.
- COVID-19 management has been a farce, as Washington bureaucrats bumbled and stumbled in their efforts to figure out how to protect the population, yet using strategies that are obvious attempts to increase their control over our citizens.
- The commission investigating the January 6 “insurrection” is an embarrassment to anyone who knows what actually happened. This group is conspiring to ensure that Donald Trump is punished for having been our President, and they are dragging out their investigation with irrelevant interviews of people, just to smear as many people as they can along the way. Their efforts are an insult to our country and the world.
The list could be much, much longer, but it’s clear to me that we are governed by ignorant and incompetent bureaucrats who have exaggerated views of their own competence, and who are determined to unite in an effort to destroy the freedoms that we treasure.
What do you think of my analysis?
Feel free to add to the list!
Published in Group Writing
Or at least not a willful avoidance of searching it out on one’s own. That way, you can demand other people provide information to you, and now the onus of proof is on them to answer a question you can answer yourself, but choose not to, because trolling is more fun.
When you wrote, “Illegally cast or counted votes exceeded the Biden margin of victory in five swing states.”
They are not “dramatically different” but minor modifications in light of an emergency situation. They also were not outside the common practice in other states. Act 77’s provision allowing for no-excuse mail in voting is hardly some radical change and local election officials were certainly not acting irresponsibly by complying with a law passed by the state legislature and signed by the governor.
As ballots are checked against voter registration rolls, there is evidence to support it.
Those who broke through police barricades.
When they are checked against voter roles. If they are checked against voter roles. If the voter roles are in any way accurate. There have been significant discrepancies for all three.
Do you have evidence of votes counted that were not checked with existing voter registration rolls?
Voter Fraud? Several Absentee Ballots in Michigan Cast by Dead People, Voters Over 120 Years Old
WRT elections, people have authority and different people holding different offices have various levels of authority. Procedures are developed by these different people exercising their authority. Sometimes there are disputes as to which people have what authority and we have a system to adjudicate those disputes. Absent an emergency or some flagrant and egregious abuse of authority, those disputes are resolved at a later date usually after the immediate election. That means in most cases the procedures promulgated by those most directly responsible for conducting the election are followed and considered legitimate for that immediate election regardless as to whether they are deemed improperly developed later.
Is willingness to collude a crime?
No, neither is collusion itself. Is your bar for the behavior of President of the United States really just “not criminal?”
That would appear to be better than what we have now, no?
Speak for yourself.
Ok. Rewind:
Your new definition of election integrity:
What is the source of the authority of those who determine the procedures?
I did write that. If “illegally cast or counted” meets some definition of “suspect,” then–yes, I did say that said votes were “suspect.”
Now will you please explain what you are talking about? What has the claim that these votes were illegally cast or counted have to do with expecting each voter to decide whether a governor’s executive order or secretary of state’s interpretation of an election statute is legally valid prior to casting their ballot?
I’m not blaming voters for being led astray by their bad governments. I’m blaming the bad governments for breaking the law.
I don’t see the relevance of whether or not they are minor modifications, emergency measures, or similar to other states. They directly violated the law. You don’t think a direct violation of the law is dramatically different? Fine; I think direct violation of the law by people whose one job is to keep the law is pretty dramatic, but we can work without that adverb.
Is direct violation of the law not a substantive difference from obeying the law?
Is direct violation of the law not a problem for election integrity?
Why would lesser laws, or procedures that lack the force of law entirely, get to define election integrity, while the state statutory law and the state constitution–the source of all lawful government functions in the state–don’t get to define election integrity?
And much more. Missing chains of custody (GA, PA, MI). Voters breaking the law to vote out of their jurisdiction (GA, and probably NV off the top of my head). Votes cast in violation of Wisconsin’s laws, chapter 6, and then counted in violation of chapter 6. Etc., etc.
I can buy that anecdote.
However, some voters recorded as being born in 1900 may not have been born in 1900. Default dates in 1900 are entered in the databases sometimes when there’s no birthday on paper records that need to be computerized, or when a birthday is kept non-public for some reason. (See big post; Ctr-F for “1900.”)
What’s your justification for dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop story, again?
They appear to have been using 1-1-1900 as the default for “no data” until a bureau-weenie noticed that looked bad, so they changed the default to 1-1-1990. Problem solved!
Conspiracy nut that I am, what I see is a Conspiracy of Incompetence. To wit, the leftists think as follows: Competence is a value of White Supremacists, thus Competence has to be fought at every opportunity. We must get people into positions of power based on racial and sexual identities and exclude anyone, particularly heterosexual White Males, who demonstrate Competence. Other people of different races and sexual orientations may display competence, and we must endeavor to exclude them from positions of power because of their complicity in White Supremacy.
We can see clearly this conspiracy, from the Vice President to most political appointments in the Biden administration.
So, Dr. Krauthamer’s great observation is no longer operable. Everyone in positions of power, to the extent possible, is to be selected based on Incompetence. So to blame Incompetence rather than Conspiracy is a meaningless distinction. The Incompetence is the Conspiracy.
Once those in positions of power are all Incompetent, they will continue to conspire, and we will have Incompetent Conspiracists.
This makes it impossible to blame Incompetence alone for what appear to be conspiratorial endeavors.
They are trying to introduce CRT into math textbooks, and I’m thinking any university that countenances this nonsense needs to close down its College of Engineering before they get someone killed. No, children … getting the right answer is not a matter of white privilege.
Given the opportunity, Leftists will make getting the right answer a criminal offense. When the bridge collapses it will be proof positive for the need for “infrastructure spending” to build back better (structurally unsound) bridges, and so on ad Infiniti’s. The term is dumbocracy, the blind deaf and dumb leading the blind deaf and dumb. In Tierra de ciegos el sordo es Rey, as they say