Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
A Tsunami Isn’t “Coming.” It’s Here
It’s probably unfair, even inaccurate, to describe current political trends in the US as a “tsunami” unless of course, you’re a self-proclaimed “progressive” Democrat. Tsunamis are large and highly destructive ocean waves, often caused by underwater earthquakes or volcanic disruptions. Nobody asks for nor wants to experience one, perhaps unless you’re the actual tsunami. Politically speaking, of course.
In the minds of many Americans, the coming tsunami isn’t destructive at all, despite media attempts to portray it as such. It’s restorative. And there is plenty of evidence that Democrats asked for it, starting with the consequences of an open southern border, rising crime rates amidst soft-on-crime and defund-the-police strategies, weakness abroad, lingering COVID mandates, teacher unions prioritized over students, and raging inflation at home.
Except the tsunami is underway. There’s no stopping it now.
Touche
Aside from the question of whether it’s better for Republicans to prolong the death of the painfully dying person, my question with this article is whether elections will ever represent the voters’ choices again.
It’s been said that if we vote harder and get a victory of 20% the election can’t be stolen. They seem to have optimistically pulled that number out of thin air. But it’s also been said that Trump either won by 7 million votes or even 14 million. If true, then his margin of victory was between 10 and 20%.
Meanwhile, those who fortified the election and counted the votes are steaming ahead, undeterred and now more practiced. And further it appears to me that unregulated and unverified voting (ballot drop boxes) has not only been unchecked by state governments, even Republican ones, but that it’s being approved in more and more states.
I may be too pessimistic to see the improvement in election integrity. Does anyone have an update on what has been definitively done to restore it?
That doesn’t equal a promise to govern like a moderate.
I agree about Romney and Cox. Utah needs to get their act together- they are a deep red state and have squishes running their government. They can afford to go hard conservative.
I would draw the line at running people like Collins out. I don’t like her – I like Romney much more- but Romney is wasting a safe seat and Collins is stealing a lib seat. Romney should move to MA and take a lib seat there- he’d be much more popular in the Republican party if he did that.
It is going to take determination by each and every one of us, right now, during the primary season, to compel the senators and representatives to replace the Lyin’ Ryan, Misleading McCarthy, Mendacious McConnell leadership.
Yes, but you can’t make an omelet without breaking some eggs. (I heard that somewhere.)
Maybe Putin? :-)
No. The RepubliCAN’T leadership in Congress has demonstrated they absolutely will not actually confound Democrats, only strike poses on video to generate more campaign contributions and set up their next lucrative career after Congress. We all know we will see, at most, Obamacare “battle” 2.0. The only way to actually confound and begin to reverse the Democrats’ agenda is to make winning the primaries this year contingent on a pledge to remove McConnell and McCarthy. Doing so burns the candidates’ boats on the shore now and so provides the only realistic assurance of any real change resulting from our votes in November.
AND.
The McCarthy/McConnell party, if allowed to continue on its decades long arc, is nearing a critical point. A McCarthy/McConnell agenda over the next two elections will result in the Republican Party going the way of the Whigs, becoming the irrelevant 3rd party, and a new major party replacing the GOP by the 2028 presidential election.
If we start now, we can have one ready by 2024.
A necessary precondition of winning is surviving.
Nominate the best Republican candidates we can. Then, whoever they are, elect them.
Because there’s a real, existential danger to unchecked Democratic rule. They are willing to burn down our institutions to secure their positions, and they can’t be left in a position to do that.
So Republicans have to win. Do the things that will help to achieve that.
Amazing how much my past actions and the reasons for them agree with some people hereabouts from whom I’ve not much heard previously.
Drew, just when I am tempted to give up on you, you file a brilliant comment like this!
DIABLO?
You’ve missed that on every other thread?
Democrat In All But Label Only.
It rhymes nicely, but please explain just how you justify attaching the adjective of “Lying” to Paul Ryan.
Please contrast with “RINO.”
Presumably, they figure DIABLOs are worse.
Will you please wake up?
Listen to the Bill Barr interview at 40:00. Keyword “strong arm”.
Look at Heath Mayo’s Twitter feed. He sounds like a student council president. He voted for Biden and he doesn’t want to talk about it.
Everything Moves Towards Communism All Of The Time™
Everything Moves Left All Of The Time™
Supreme Court Justice Merrick Garland begs to differ.
Better for whom? That was the Tea Party’s hope. After the GOPe killed it they dined off its remains for quite some time though a variety of grifts that financially enriched them. And got their RINO (or, as some are now putting it, American In Name Only) comrades elected.
The culmination of the bipartisan collaboration on immigration is the border collapse under Biden. It is is on track to admit 6 million illegals to the USA this year and within three months will include amnesty.
This means irreversible, existential change. It will destroy the remains of the working class citizenry (a word rapidly becoming obsolete if not functionally meaningless) and further, perhaps irreparably, harm the middle class.
As Steve Bannon keeps saying, every American town is now a border town.
One question is whether the smylers with the knife who took our money and votes and then broke our borders and shipped our manufacturing overseas deserve the Eighth or the Ninth Circle of Dante’s Inferno.
We “optimistically” thought the Romneys, Ryans, Murkowskis and others shared our principles. They don’t. They will share, though; they’ll take our money and votes as long as we give them and see their election as a “victory.”
Good question. So why is there so much opposition to primarying them?
Perhaps another argument in favor of term limits.
If the democrats manage to maintain power in this election it is over. If they expand their majority in the Senate by even one vote it is likely that they will create two states, pack the supreme court, and make voting fraud the norm. Once that happens your new party isn’t worth its charter and the only way to get political change will be from the end of a gun.
Who is opposed primarying them?
I like that.
If the chances of getting term limits could ever be less than zero, it’s probably now.
The main obstacle to term limits is term limit advocates. However, as you point out, there are other obstacles right now, too.
I disagree with you there. The main obstacle to term limits is self interest. The people voting for the term limits are the people they would be applied to. The only way term limits are going to happen is if they are forced on the political class.
Term limits enable the bureaucracy and the lobbyists. It’s been a disaster in California.
Problem is, the term limit advocates always insist on such severe term limits that even a huge fan of term limits, such as myself, will not be in favor. There isn’t enough support for drastic term limits, and shouldn’t be. And we don’t need drastic term limits to make a huge difference.
Yes, and modest term limits won’t have those problems.