Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Biden Mumbles Statement on Ukraine
No one expects a Biden statement to build confidence on the homefront or inspire fear in our enemies. So we shouldn’t be surprised the president’s brief presser on Friday was an hour late and won’t change much between Russia and Ukraine.
The only news was the president saying he is now convinced Putin plans to invade his smaller neighbor. “Ashuhv hiss momen ahm covissed he’s made uh deshishan,” Biden mumbled, but stressed the Russian leader can choose diplomacy any time he wants. (Or, “dipomacy aways possumility” in Biden-speak.)
Russia was likely behind a massive cyberattack on Ukraine earlier this week, a typical pre-invasion move. Putin has 169,000-190,000 troops in or near Ukraine and in the past two days has blamed several “attacks” in the Donbas region on Ukrainian troops. False-flag ops are often used as a pretext for war, especially in Russian military history.
Vice President Kamala Harris is currently in Munich for Saturday peace talks and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is scheduled to attend. Many US and NATO officials, along with several Ukraine politicians, are urging him to remain in his own country due to the worsening situation.
All indications point to a Russian invasion any day now. In essence, a replay of the seizure of Crimea when Biden was vice president.
Published in Foreign Policy, Military, Politics
As far as I can tell the Ukrainian people by a large majority do not want to be under Russian influence. The nation state is what we have as legal boundaries. Anyone in Ukraine that prefers to be under Russian law should immigrate to Russia.
I’m not specifically talking abour Ukraine here. Just about the broad statement that “300-year old claims are meaningless.” To a Westphalian Realist, sure. To a people divided by a line, not so much. Same for two peoples unwisely lumped together. See Sudan, and why there is now a South Sudan. (I’m going to read up on this, make sure I’m not blowing smoke).
I understand. But isn’t Sudan more of an internal thing where people want to break away? I’m not against people breaking away. If a large enough segment of a society feel the need for self-determination, I’m for it. After all I support the American Revolution! Unfortunately it almost always requires some violent means.
The first cousin to nationalism is irredentism.
One of many, to be sure.