Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Or, the FBI Is Lying
In these quickening times, the abbreviated news cycles are so packed with fast moving events (and pseudo-events) that many things pass relatively unnoticed and disappear forever from our focus all too quickly. More and more these days I will come across a story…or even a short sentence within a story (see title above)…that illustrates quite well just why (I suspect) much of the background noise is purposefully injected into the news cycles. Certain inconvenient details and “knowns” must be snuffed out of our collective memories (and the text of the narrative used to push our buttons at critical moments long ago) and reminders of them must be muted as much as possible. With a hat tip to OffThePress.com for pointing me to this link earlier this week, this may be just the latest good example:
The January 6 Pipe Bombs Look Like Another FBI Hoax
No one still trying to convince the public that two pipe bombs were planted near the Capitol in advance of January 6 can be believed.
Because I have my own agenda, I want to start with this:
In the 15-minute time span before the joint session of Congress convened at 1:00 p.m. on January 6, 2021, … a woman named Karlin Younger who just happened to be walking to a laundry facility near the Republican National Committee headquarters just happened to look down and see what she believed was a pipe bomb nestled between a dumpster and a fence right next to the building.
I really want to focus on a key – yet probably under-noticed – point of the story so far even though it appears twice in that short passage: “…just happened to be…”. At this point I am reflexively reminded of a strange tale from the late 1990s when (if I recall correctly) a married couple just happened to be out on one of their frequent evening drives around rural Georgia where they enjoyed listening to the various wireless phone signals for which their car just happened to be equipped to detect. It seems they came across a strategy call among Speaker Gingrich and his cohorts. Thankfully, this couple also just happened to have equipment for recording these signals and did so. Additionally, this couple just happened to be Democrat Party informants, so they delivered their recording rather directly to the DNC where is made some measure of “breaking news” for quite a few cycles…and the miraculously complex “just happened to” details behind the origin of the recording were quickly pushed out of the story. (That is all from memory…feel free to correct or add to the story as you wish.) Anyway, in our current story, I am already suspicious of one of our characters:
Which leads us to the woman who “found” the pipe bombs outside the RNC right just before the joint session gaveled in on January 6. Karlin Younger is described in news reports as a “resident” of D.C. or an employee of the Department of Commerce.
But Younger’s résumé is a bit more detailed. On January 6, when she took a midday walk to the laundromat and found the first pipe bomb, Younger was a project manager for FirstNet Authority, a public-private partnership between AT&T and first responders to prioritize emergency communications during an attack or disaster. Standing board members for FirstNet include the attorney general and secretary of Homeland Security. Several federal agencies, including the Justice Department, use FirstNet services.
And a few weeks before January 6, FirstNet received its largest-ever commitment from a law enforcement agency, a $92 million contract for FirstNet’s services.
That agency was the FBI.
Seems there are several “just happened to be” details in there. News reports just happen to leave out the interesting details of the biography of the person who reported finding the pipe bomb…a person who just happened to be on a mundane Monday mid-day walk to the laundromat that just happened to be very near the center the news universe…on a day that just happened to be 10x more brilliantly lit than any in recent history…and she just happened to find the explosive device. I would not be surprised in the least to find out that this woman just happened to be the favorite niece of the Georgia couple I discussed above.
But, my agenda aside, there is much more to the story:
Capitol police the next day issued a statement. “The USCP Hazardous Materials Response Team determined that both devices were, in fact, hazardous and could cause great harm to public safety,” Steven Sund, the Capitol police chief wrote on January 7, the day he resigned from the force. “The devices were disabled and turned over to the FBI for further investigation and analysis.”
…[The FBI] has yet to produce any investigative report about the pipe bombs or official confirmation of how the devices were detonated.
As the skeptic I am, the seemingly purposely precise language “both devices were, in fact, hazardous and could cause great harm to public safety” is too vague for me anymore. And again, the lack of a report (and/or any real reporting) by now seems to mean that they want us to forget about this little part of the narrative.
One more interesting detail:
Politico recently reported that Kamala Harris was inside the DNC headquarters at the same time the explosive sat outside the building. Harris, who inexplicably left the Capitol around 11:30 a.m. on January 6 after attending an intelligence briefing, choosing not to participate as a U.S. senator in the certification of her own historical election, was evacuated out of the DNC headquarters by the Secret Service at 1:14 p.m., several minutes after Capitol police inspected the building after the RNC bomb was found.
That shocking revelation means one of two things: The Secret Service, in a security sweep of the DNC building and exterior grounds prior to her arrival, missed what the FBI insists was a viable explosive device—a scenario that seems deeply unlikely considering the city was in a state of heightened alert and agents presumably would be extra cautious.
Or, the FBI is lying.
Go read the whole thing. (Maybe even print a hard copy for your file…I know I did.)
Published in General
I suspect an inside job by our national police, something like this:
There is so much here that doesn’t add up (all pointing toward the title of this thread), but there is one scenario where I could see these as being the actual “devices” that were “discovered.” One.
First, the creators of these things couldn’t pass Tinker toys 101.
These “people” consider us to be rubes, country hicks, poorly educated and easily – led. They saw no need to get more elaborate, knowing that with the FBI’s, or whomever’s help, these things would do the trick. The dem’s would jump at any chance to make trouble for Trump. and the NT’ers were too stupid to give it objective thought, jumping on the same bandwagon. It didn’t matter what the rest of us, the unwashed masses, thought. They had their narrative.
Pointing to the Bureau’s half – baked charade of attempting to identify the “bomber,” and the secrecy surrounding the actual “devices” themselves (so where did these pictures come from, anyway?), I also noted the official description of them being “hazardous.” Heck, a kid running into one of these on his skateboard, could fall and break his arm! If that isn’t hazardous enough for you, what is?
This does bring to mind a song I did several decades ago, in a barbershop quartet contest. We really should have been disqualified. Here’s the best rendition I can find: https://vimeo.com/496288128
Wasn’t ‘Clock Boy” available?
In my comic scenario, you just might be wrong. Hear me out:
FBI report, leaked by someone close to Director Wray:
The devices were placed openly as directed, however in our after-action investigation, our agent identified several factors that likely contributed to the failure of the device to be seen and reported.
(1) most workers in DC who arrive before noon are younger millennials who are gazing at their phones and monitoring Twitter. This was clearly seen on surveillance videos.
(2) of those we interviewed after cross-referencing video footage and face recognition database who actually did see the device, none recognized the ‘kitchen timer’ element. After further questioning, these recent Ivy League graduates told investigators that they saw ‘timers’ as digital devices. When asked if they had never seen such a device as an analog kitchen timer before, each exhibited a puzzled, dismissive expression, followed by a flat “no”.
Thus the device went wholly unrecognized. For future actions of this sort, we recommend a using more modern components that young people from this generation and frankly, those of a more wealthy background, can mentally process. Using a digital device as a countdown clock might be a significant improvement.
Addendum. After interrogating one middle-aged man who apparently noticed the device reported that he had recently seen the Clint Eastwood film about Richard Jewell and was “afraid” to call authorities. He defended his actions by claiming it was so obvious he assumed someone else would report it anyway, that he was having other personal problems in his life and did not want the attention. This man has been placed on administrative leave from his position.
I seem to recall there was a CoC rule against publishing conspiracy theories. If so, it is time to retire that rule. Too many things that sound like theories turn out to be fact. At least with regard to the Administrative State. There is evidence that the American people are under siege from its government — all three branches. I think we are in trouble.
Perhaps revise the rule.
In another development Epstien’s pimp, Jean-Luc Brunel did not kill himself…
I’ll admit, it was definitely a poorly thought out sequel.
And yet, it’s one of my guilty pleasures. I even own the laser disc.
And the cameras were off. What are the odds?
It likely will not surprise many, but the real intent of the reference was this:
I will also admit that I read it in 1998 but remember nothing about it except the title.
Thank you. I wondered if anyone else remembered that kid and the “Islamophobia” he and his dad deliberately tried to whip up.
Yes, deliberately. That story was as sketchy as one of Leonardo’s journals.
Just to re-emphasis the point:
Since no one took me up on it, here are some corrective details from my 30 second internet search:
[Emphasis added]
Seems to be several layers of BS piled up in that tale….and those “skills” have only been honed to perfection over the subsequent decades. It also helps that so many are all too willing to overlook intelligence insulting BS like this and direct their attention to whatever shiny object idiots like Liz Cheney are pushing today.
That’s insane. Is that the same person, both “bombs”? It’s like they purposefully sat and posed in public locations where literally everyone knows there’s a security camera. Mask, hoodie, glasses, at night? Walking around with a backpack, in hand, not slung like a student? Sitting, then walking, circling specific areas? Might as well carry a sign that says “I AM THE BOMB GUY”, y’know, just to make sure everyone gets it.
It’s not like this is hard to do, to gin up some fear and over-reaction. Although as others have pointed out, the Capitol building itself has been actually bombed, multiple times, and the very foundations of our democracy have not been overturned, nor does the country stop because Congress doesn’t show up to work on a Monday.
A scanner that picks up RF signals picks up a conference call, on a phone line? *And* they happened to just have a tape recorder in the car, with a mic, ready to record the accidentally overheard call?
Why would that be the only recording if anyone with a scanner could pick it up? Like the 500 cops in the area, or anyone with a scanner in their basement? Not one other person but these two?
Sure.
And again, note the 60 minute timers.
Yeah, he wasn’t exactly in a hurry to get the job done, was he? Almost as if he wanted to be seen. . .
When was the last time TPTB fired that weapon in anger? It’s a good rule so long as it isn’t abused or sea-lawyered (or Sea-Lioned) to death. So far so good as far as I can tell.
Waiting for MWM to get to comment #25…
Or, if you like Sundance’s analysis all four branches of the government. Three Constitutionally specified and one not.
And there’s no control over the one that’s not.
So maybe the FBI really was kind of, sort of, trying to make Jan6 look like the Reichstag bombing or fire???
No question in my mind — or in the minds of anyone paying attention.
Those who watch too much CNN or read the Washington Post are lost to brainwashing.
Over, no. By, yes.
January 20,2024 Update (a full 23 months later):
I still say the intellectually curious would start this investigation with the electronic communications to and from the devices of the then Speaker (and her staff) in the days and weeks prior to the events. (Please filter out the volumes of perfectly legitimate insider stock tips to her husband.)
I wonder, is it just coincidence that FBI is an anagram for fib?
Yes, but they prefer to be called “fibbies” not “fibbers”.
I object: WE are the fibbees. They are the fibbers.