Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
DMED Is a Game-changer on Vaccine Safety
On Monday, Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) held a panel discussion on vaccine safety (see Second Opinion). During this hearing we learned about some DOD whistleblowers that revealed alarming data on vaccine safety. These protected whistleblowers shared data from the DMED and it is a game-changer.
DMED is the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database. DMED was created to track every illness of military members from an epidemiological standpoint for the purpose of diagnosing any adverse health trend that could affect military readiness. It is accurate, complete and designed for early detection of issues in the military population.
Daniel Horowitz has been working with the whistleblowers to get the word out. From the data (and there is a *lot* of data) it looks 2020 (year 1 of Covid) was like the previous 4 years and 2021 (year 1 of vaccines) shows alarming upticks in medical problems. The whistleblowers went public, because their commanders ignored the issue. Here are some findings from Daniel:
In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182.
Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!
Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:
- myocardial infarction –269% increase
- Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
- congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
- female infertility – 471% increase
- pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase
These findings from the best epidemiological database in the world are enough to make me conclude that the Covid Vaccines are unsafe for military age people until Pfizer/Moderna can provide better data. Given a choice between great data from the US military and redacted data from Big Pharma, I’ll choose the great data.
Published in Military
This on Am G is the latest news I’ve seen. It links to a Politifiction article that rates Renz’s story “false” because DoD said so.
According to the article, the DMED db has been taken down, presumably to be taken to the cellar and given a good attitude adjustment with the rubber hose. DoD says the data for 2016-20 is way too low and they’re going to have to find some more cases to document, so 2021 doesn’t look so bad.
Now I am much more inclined to take Mr. Renz’s allegations seriously. I’d like very much to get my hands on a backup copy of that DB from last week, but the odds of that are nil. But Renz must have more than just that spreadsheet. He would go a long way towards credibility if he released the raw data he worked from and presumably downloaded.
I think I read here that Renz had copies of the data made and has secreted them in various places.
Why the secrecy? Maybe it contains PII, but redacting that is a common task.
In my lifetime I’ve read all sorts of things. Some of them are even true.
So they can’t be confiscated.
Come to think of it, you’re right. He could even leak it to a paper.
Imagine a U.S. military whistleblower feeds you a crapload of data that nobody wants you to see. How quick will you be to release it to the public? Might you worry a little about a few unmarked vehicles pulling into your driveway and disappearing into a D.C. jail on to-be-determined charges?
I’d be in no hurry to release anything. I’d be spending all day for weeks researching the law about what my rights as a recipient of that information was and I’d be carefully vetting allies to help me distribute it properly.
That’d make sense if he hadn’t already exposed summaries of that data, which makes it plain he’s received it. If he’s in trouble for having it, that cat is out of the bag.
I wouldn’t release them, either, if doing so would ruin my chance of bluffing my way out.
Has he? I watched him comment on on it in that hearing but I haven’t seen him actually release a document. It’s one thing to say an unnamed source says that the figures are A, B, and C. There’s nothing illegal about that. It’s quite another thing to distribute a report you were not given a clearance to obtain.
Case in point. There is a report on election systems vulnerabilities in AK that was conducted by our Lt. Governor in July 2020. It produced seven pages of conclusions/recommendations needed to secure the next election (2020) all redacted.
The redacted version is in the public and 80% of it is redacted. It’s worthless. The full version is only obtainable if I sign a NDA which makes me having it worthless because I can’t legally write about it. So here we are with government reports documenting fraud that nobody can release because it will land them in legal hot water.
It’s not such a simple matter to leak something to the media when you know the first thing every major paper or news outlet will do is pick up the phone and turn you in to the FBI the second you hang up.
The military said:
To which Daniel Horowitz points out more inconsistencies than characters I am allowed to post. See here: https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-military-spokesman-claims-5-random-years-of-dod-medical-surveillance-system-were-plagued-by-a-giant-glitch
One thing is that if the baseline data (2016-2020) is missing big chunks of data to explain the jump in miscarriages, then why is Lyme disease consistent through 2021? There is a link to a page with graphs and a pdf.
These docs are already guilty of not going through channels, i.e., sending possibly sensitive data only to those whose job it would be to bury it if that was in the military’s best interest.
I worked in military clinical and medical research labs a long time ago. There was not the same emphasis on personal privacy as with HIPAA nowadays. The operant concern was that data about things like lots of flu cases, medical downsides of increased drug and alcohol abuse, unusual bacteriological infections and similar collective data was all raw intel about readiness so there was sometimes oddly specific advice given about not discussing things and it was clear that the Army claimed the authority to control that kind of info.
That sort of habit of mind would be a basis (pretext?) for locking down vax complication data. If it really is smoking gun stuff, there would be consequences for leaking the raw data and the leaker would have to be ready to take a big hit.
And may already be.
Good point.
I wonder if the IRS people who leaked data to Pro Publica are ready to take a big hit.
Ha ha.