Empathy, Sympathy, and a Moment for Grace…Even For Alec Baldwin

 

Alec Baldwin is not a good man.

We can go through his long personal, political, and professional history and document all the ways in which Baldwin has acted in disgusting, horrible fashions. It would take about 50 seconds on Google to come up with enough information to write a 2,000-word piece on the subject.

But this moment is not about Alec Baldwin.

In a horrible incident in New Mexico, on the set of the movie “Rust”, Baldwin apparently fired a prop gun, and some kind of projectile of unknown type was ejected, with horrible consequences: Director of photography Halyna Hutchins, 42, was transported to the hospital via helicopter and pronounced dead by medical personnel at University of New Mexico Hospital, according to the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office.

Director Joel Souza, 48, was transported to Christus St. Vincent’s Regional Medical Center by ambulance for care. Details on his condition were not released.

The scope of the tragedy is hard to comprehend for the Hollywood community. Hutchins was a well-known cinematographer, and the grieving throughout the industry was seen all over social media. Souza is expected to make a full recovery, and is lucky not to have been more seriously injured.

Baldwin expressed his shock and sadness regarding the tragic events on social media. “There are no words to convey my shock and sadness regarding the tragic accident that took the life of Halyna Hutchins, a wife, mother, and deeply admired colleague of ours.”

As those closest involved with the incident deal with the repercussions of this tragedy, the public spectacle is one we are all familiar with. Those that despise Baldwin have often been almost gleeful at what has befallen him. Others are simply using the moment to point out the many times Baldwin has failed to show sympathy or empathy to those he dislikes, most famously former Vice President Dick Cheney. Baldwin famously ridiculed Cheney after the Vice President accidentally shot and wounded a friend on a hunting trip (the man survived with minor injuries).

None of this speaks well of civil society in America today. These are the moments that define what type of nation we want to have, and want to aspire to. Our nation remains engulfed in a divisive culture war, with all sides treating Americans they view as the enemy as a ‘foreign’ force that must be politically destroyed and excluded from public life.

Baldwin is clearly not a sympathetic character in this regard. Few have done more to worsen our civil discourse. He has had long-running feuds with numerous conservatives, and his despise for former Presidents Donald Trump and George W. Bush is public and well known.

This is however when the concept of empathy, sympathy, and grace become most important. When things are well, and people are content, it is far easier to express sympathy to those we not only dislike, but fail to understand. But in times like these, when we are polarized and divided, it becomes extremely difficult to rise above the rancor and anger.

I’ve written about the concepts of empathy and sympathy many times, and especially in regards to our failure to promote these concepts for the greater good of civility in American society. Here is an excerpt from 2018:

When someone tries to display sympathy for another person’s hardships and anguish, it is simply an acknowledgment that we understand what that person is going through, and we simply hope for their quick recovery. In traditional society, the quickest and most common way to demonstrate that heartfelt belief was to send prayers to those that were suffering. Sharing sympathetic thoughts is one significant way in which we experience a greater sense of shared similarities together, and allows for a more profound personal engagement than one would generally have with people under normal situations.

Empathy, on the other hand, is the ability to put one’s self into the shoes of another, and to truly understand their point of view. It allows us to come to terms with how others came to make the decision they chose to make, without allowing our own biases to cloud that judgment. So the uniqueness of empathy is that, unlike sympathy, it allows for people to join together and at least attempt to have a shared experience. First and foremost, it involves seeing someone else’s situation from their perspective, and second, sharing their emotions, including their distress.

Most of us cannot truly understand the grief that Halyna Hutchins’ family is going through, nor can we comprehend that devastation and despair that Alec Baldwin is feeling. But we can attempt to be empathetic in trying to understand the devastation caused by this tragic incident.

Baldwin may not be a generous or open-hearted person to those he politically disagrees with, but he is a human with human emotions. And this is a moment in which our common humanity should rise above the anger, rhetoric, and divisiveness that Baldwin, and many of us, have contributed to over the years.

And this is why the concept of grace is so critical to a civil society. Grace, ultimately, is the generous, free and totally unexpected and undeserved understanding of one to another. It is a concept unencumbered by the concept of just deserts, which demands we take ‘an eye for an eye’ as a just punishment for prior injustices.

Grace requires that our sympathetic, empathetic and graceful nature rise above the bad behavior of others. Baldwin probably is undeserving of our empathy. He failed to be graceful when his enemies were in a similar position. But grace requires us to elevate our spirit above and beyond what we would expect of others. Grace requires us to do what we believe is right, even if those we bestow that gift on would not do the same for us.

This is a sacrifice for many of us. It is easy to be mean-spirited and spiteful to those that have behaved that way toward us. Ultimately, however, such a society only damages us all. The true spirit of a truly peaceful and accepting society is one where we forgive, and try to rise above the anger and rancor. And only by acting in this manner can we hope to become a more civil society.

Published in Culture
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 193 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Tex929rr Coolidge
    Tex929rr
    @Tex929rr

    Instugator (View Comment):
    Funny thing about that. In the last 6 years there has been a couple of instances where it wasn’t done correctly. In at least one case the crew of a B-1 attempted ejection and the system failed (didn’t work at all). Subsequent investigation found a significant portion of the fleet where the ejection seats were assembled incorrectly. Big deal.

    When Madame Tex started flying T-38’s the ejection seats required two steps:  pulling upon a handle and then pulling a trigger inside the handle (on either side of the seat). They kept finding dead pilots who had raised the handle and then (apparently) decided they would try to save the aircraft, and failed.  The AF removed the triggers so that once you made the first step you were committed. 

    • #181
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Instugator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Wow, I never knew that Kirstie (note the correct spelling) Alley ever used a gun in her acting roles.

    I humbly regret the error.

    Well, it’s not your error if Kirstie said it.  I just can’t find where she was ever handed a gun, much less 100 times.

    • #182
  3. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    I’ll continue to think that it’s unrealistic to expect or demand that guns be handled the same way on set as they are in real life, or that it’s inappropriate to delegate some of the responsibility for safety to others.

    You can delegate authority, not responsibility.

    But, and this is important, each of the outside sources cited show the actors in question exercising responsibility by have the weapon cleared in front of them or doing it themselves.

    Just because you have an armorer on set to ensure the security and maintenance of the weapons, it in no way absolves the actor whose booger hook is on the bang switch.

    I’m currently in development of a screenplay called Booger Hook and the Bang Switch. It’s still in the idea stage.

    Booger Hook?  I thought he was dead?  Oh wait, that’s Snake Plissken.

    • #183
  4. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Wow, I never knew that Kirstie (note the correct spelling) Alley ever used a gun in her acting roles.

    I humbly regret the error.

    Well, it’s not your error if Kirstie said it. I just can’t find where she was ever handed a gun, much less 100 times.

    My error was that I misspelled her name and you pointed out to me

    • #184
  5. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    When Madame Tex started flying T-38’s the ejection seats required two steps:  pulling upon a handle and then pulling a trigger inside the handle (on either side of the seat). They kept finding dead pilots who had raised the handle and then (apparently) decided they would try to save the aircraft, and failed.  The AF removed the triggers so that once you made the first step you were committed. 

    Wow, I flew T-38 in 1988 and it only had the single stage ejection sequence –

    Boldface – HANDGRIPS RAISE

    The T-37 was a 2-stage Ejection Sequence (if she flew far enough back she would have flown the T-37)

    HANDGRIPS RAISE 

     (Jettisoned the Canopy)

    TRIGGERS SQUEEZE

     (Fired the seat – do this even if the canopy doesn’t go in the first step, there is a canopy penetrator on the seat what will puncture the canopy and you eject through the shards)

    The B-52 on the other hand also had a 2 stage ejection system.

    ARMING LEVERS ROTATE

     (same as handgrips raise, BUT if the hatch doesn’t go, DO NOT go to the next step)

    TRIGGER SQUEEZE

    • #185
  6. Tex929rr Coolidge
    Tex929rr
    @Tex929rr

    Instugator (View Comment):
    Wow, I flew T-38 in 1988 and it only had the single stage ejection sequence –

    UPT 83-08 at CBM  She was an IP on the line in March of 84.  I was a civil engineer there and we had to empty out a small building for FMS to do the seat conversions during 85 or 86.  She left to teach at PIT at Randolph in early 87.  

    • #186
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Instugator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Wow, I never knew that Kirstie (note the correct spelling) Alley ever used a gun in her acting roles.

    I humbly regret the error.

    Well, it’s not your error if Kirstie said it. I just can’t find where she was ever handed a gun, much less 100 times.

    My error was that I misspelled her name and you pointed out to me

    Oh, that.  It may not matter in her case but my usual reason for doing that is so that people get the correct results if they do a Google search or something.

    • #187
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):
    Funny thing about that. In the last 6 years there has been a couple of instances where it wasn’t done correctly. In at least one case the crew of a B-1 attempted ejection and the system failed (didn’t work at all). Subsequent investigation found a significant portion of the fleet where the ejection seats were assembled incorrectly. Big deal.

    When Madame Tex started flying T-38’s the ejection seats required two steps: pulling upon a handle and then pulling a trigger inside the handle (on either side of the seat). They kept finding dead pilots who had raised the handle and then (apparently) decided they would try to save the aircraft, and failed. The AF removed the triggers so that once you made the first step you were committed.

    Could it be that, in the stress of the moment, they forgot about activating the trigger?

    • #188
  9. Tex929rr Coolidge
    Tex929rr
    @Tex929rr

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Could it be that, in the stress of the moment, they forgot about activating the trigger?

    Doubtful.    If you read the “bold face“ that Instugator posted above, that’s one of a small number of procedures that every pilot, including student pilots, were drilled on incessantly and had to repeat verbatim, punctuation included.  They are procedures for which there is no time to consult the check list.  (Commercial aircraft have the same thing – at FedEx they called them dash-1’s).  There wasn’t a whole lot of solo T38 flying, which means someone is saying “bail out” three times. More likely yelling it.  No command ejection system so each pilot is on her or his own.  

    • #189
  10. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Like the T-38 single engine go around

    THROTTLE(S) – MAX

    FLAPS – 60%

    ATTAIN FINAL APPROACH SPEED MINIMUM

    Which is very similar to the T-38 Single Engine Takeoff

    THROTTLE(S) – MAX

    FLAPS – 60%

    ATTAIN AIRSPEED ABOVE SETOS, 10 KNOTS DESIRED

    • #190
  11. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    It’s like pack your own chute, except in this case the life you save won’t be your own.

    This example makes me a bit more sympathetic to Henry’s argument. Mrs Tex flew fast movers in the Air Force and never packed her own chute. So giving over some of the responsibility for one’s safety isn’t unprecedented or just a Hollywood thing. The difference would be that the parachute is strictly a life saving device, and while a firearm can save one’s life that’s far from its only purpose.

    Funny thing about that. In the last 6 years there has been a couple of instances where it wasn’t done correctly. In at least one case the crew of a B-1 attempted ejection and the system failed (didn’t work at all). Subsequent investigation found a significant portion of the fleet where the ejection seats were assembled incorrectly. Big deal.

    I remember, dang, years ago, that we were buying out ejection seats from Russia.  I asked, Do we really want to trust our seats to our enemy?  And the answer was, Well, we wouldn’t be buying them if they didn’t work.

    • #191
  12. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    I’ll continue to think that it’s unrealistic to expect or demand that guns be handled the same way on set as they are in real life, or that it’s inappropriate to delegate some of the responsibility for safety to others.

    You can delegate authority, not responsibility.

    But, and this is important, each of the outside sources cited show the actors in question exercising responsibility by have the weapon cleared in front of them or doing it themselves.

    Just because you have an armorer on set to ensure the security and maintenance of the weapons, it in no way absolves the actor whose booger hook is on the bang switch.

    I’m currently in development of a screenplay called Booger Hook and the Bang Switch. It’s still in the idea stage.

    Booger Hook? I thought he was dead? Oh wait, that’s Snake Plissken.

    Booger Hook was Captain Hook’s nephew and right hand man.

    • #192
  13. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    I’ll continue to think that it’s unrealistic to expect or demand that guns be handled the same way on set as they are in real life, or that it’s inappropriate to delegate some of the responsibility for safety to others.

    You can delegate authority, not responsibility.

    But, and this is important, each of the outside sources cited show the actors in question exercising responsibility by have the weapon cleared in front of them or doing it themselves.

    Just because you have an armorer on set to ensure the security and maintenance of the weapons, it in no way absolves the actor whose booger hook is on the bang switch.

    I’m currently in development of a screenplay called Booger Hook and the Bang Switch. It’s still in the idea stage.

    Booger Hook? I thought he was dead? Oh wait, that’s Snake Plissken.

    Booger Hook was Captain Hook’s nephew and right hand man.

    Because his left hand was another hook?

    • #193
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.