Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Selling Secrets: The Problem No One Is Talking About
The FBI has arrested nuclear engineer Jonathan Toebbe and his wife, Diana, for trying to sell government secrets, plans for building nuclear submarines, to an unnamed foreign power. It turns out the agent of the foreign power was an undercover FBI agent. They were picked up doing a dead drop, Jonathan dropping off the secrets with Diana standing guard. Bad stuff.
How did they get caught? It seems that Mr. Toebbe solicited the foreign power by email. Apparently, this email was intercepted by the FBI. An FBI agent responded, pretending to be an agent of the foreign power.
Here is what bothers me. How did the FBI (or the National Security Agency or whoever) intercept that original email enabling the undercover operation? Does this mean that the FBI and/or NSA or someone else from the government is monitoring all emails sent by everyone to anywhere? Or are they just monitoring emails going to and from the unnamed foreign power?
I’m glad to see these treasonous criminals caught, but I am concerned about the methods used to catch them. What do those methods mean for our privacy and our freedom?
Published in General
That’s why Five Eyes is a quid pro quo arrangement. Not for hire.
That’s what I saw reported too. Makes you wonder what foreign country it is. A country that Toebbe assumed was an adversary to the US but then acted as an ally would?
I can only think of one.
Turkey?
I’ve been trying to remember the decision but I can’t. But it was sensible.
Yes, and can’t quid pro quo be considered payment in kind? It’s not like Gladys, a neighbor, spying on a house and on her own accord calling the police.
Considering the silence about it, it might be China.
No, that doesn’t fly.
You would think so, wouldn’t you? Apparently no one’s dared to try it out in a court of law.
As God is your witness, Les?
🤣
Ar Ar, Earth humor!
If it was China, I would expect they photocopied the information first, and/or they already had it perhaps stolen another way.
I was thinking Israel, but then somebody pointed out they have no subs, so what would they do with the information? But maybe this guy was dumb enough not to know.
I think we need to think outside the box. These are the countries that already have nuclear subs:
1 United States 72
2 Russia 45
3 People’s Republic of China 14
4 United Kingdom 11
5 France 10
6 India 2
I guess, but why would anyone think that Israel would be sufficiently adversarial to be interested in the clandestine information?
(Plus, Israel probably has other ways to steal the information, and maybe already has.)
Yes, that makes more sense. But if China already had it, they might return the documents.
From what I read earlier in this thread, the documents WERE returned.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=mr+universe+serenity&ru=%2fvideos%2fsearch%3fq%3dmr%2buniverse%2bserenity%26FORM%3dHDRSC3&view=detail&mid=ECF8FF71B706300E625AECF8FF71B706300E625A&rvsmid=C6F657A6E6ECD84D51D0C6F657A6E6ECD84D51D0&FORM=VDQVAP
I would assume that any communication sent to an IP address outside the US is at least scanned for certain keywords.
I suspect that it’s much more than that.
The photo of the Toebbes’ house showed a Black Lives Matter sign, and from what I read, they are Lefties.
I have yet to read that there were no warrants involved.
Not even an Ally, but maybe a partner. Any number of reasons to behave that way.
Especially if there was no benefits to them for the information and if they thought it would get them PNGd off they kept it.
We have legal arrangements with numerous countries.
Yes, that’s right. The question comes up because the 4th amendment and 5th amendments only prohibit government violations of the rights mentioned. But if a private person or entity is acting on behalf of, or as an agent of, the state, then the 4th A and 5th A protections extend to their conduct as well.
Like Israel is the problem.
Seen up the street from my home.
We don’t know that the foreign power did not make copies of the material.
I think it was Israel.
Well, they did steal the plans for the Mirage, I think it was.
The Toebbes are left wingers. Which means they probably hate Israel. But not commie countries.
Good.
Was that the Kfir, or do I have the wrong middle-eastern power?
With any luck it was. But I think Jonathon Pollard is still in jail.
I don’t understand what middle eastern power are you referring to?