Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections

 

Rigged CoverMollie Hemingway applies her talent—rigorous and thoughtful old-school journalism—to documenting the 2020 assault against America perpetrated by the evil alliance of the progressive movement, the entrenched bureaucracy, modern “journalism”, and big technology firms. Yes, the election was rigged. But the core of Rigged is the story of years of lawfare, private takeovers of election boards by well-funded progressives, ill-considered and/or uncontested consent agreements, the flouting of long-standing election law, and the shielding thereof by a twisted judiciary.

This book does not lay out specific proof that Trump won on November 3, 2020. It does show how the unprecedented surge in mail-in voting, and the suppression of the anti-fraud measures that are supposed to accompany it, made 2020 a perfect storm for untraceable fraud. Meanwhile, the media’s four-year campaign to oust Trump by any means necessary ground on, with regular assistance from an entrenched bureaucracy willing to do anything to avoid draining the swamp. Add in a huge assist by abrupt changes in the censorship practices of big social media firms, and you have the tools to lift a mediocre basement-dweller over the most energetic and energizing politician of my lifetime. (I’m 54, fwiw.)

My copy of Rigged, pictured, is festooned with Post-It flags for the statements and quotations that were new to me or struck me as particularly significant. I can’t possibly mention them all in this review—I placed 77 of these markers. But I can hit the highlights of each chapter.

Mollie sets the stage with a brief prologue, letting you know that you aren’t crazy if you think Trump’s victory was stolen.

The first chapter is a discussion of the changes in voting laws over the history of the United States, from pre-colonial times to the present. Some of this was completely new to me, especially that the secret ballot wasn’t really all that secret until late in the 19th century, with the introduction of “Australian-style” ballots printed by the government. Fully public and partially public voting practices prior to this were shockingly prone to coercion and fraud, especially in the form of vote-buying. The reforms of the time were particularly focused on abolishing voting by mail, and eliminating long time periods for voting. Election day was established by amendment to be the Tuesday after the first Monday of November to avoid influencing the outcome of states that voted later in the calendar based on reports of the outcome in other states. Mollie’s exposition shows how we (these United States) are going backward to known-abusive voting procedures.

The second chapter discusses how Trump’s enemies were strewn through the establishment, and included antagonistic Republicans. Trump’s policies are poison for big-government enthusiasts in both parties, and those policies’ successes across a variety of topics were embarrassing to the failures that preceded him. His foreign policy successes, like Peace in the Middle East, demonstrated the bankruptcy of the establishment’s own policy preferences. Meanwhile, Trump’s economic policies were so successful, across all classes and among minorities, that re-alignment of traditional Democratic constituencies was in full swing. The establishment desperately needed to stop Trump.

The third chapter lays out the impact Covid-19 had on the presidential contest. And how every twist and turn in the course of events was portrayed in the media in the worst possible light for Trump, and the best possible light for his antagonists (particularly Cuomo in New York), regardless of the hypocrisy. The politicization of science, already a grave problem in any topic that lives on public research funds, reached new heights in 2020 (and continuing today, I might add). Mollie doesn’t really dwell on the scientific details of Covid-19, as that isn’t really relevant to the theme of Rigged. Her presentation is focused on the excuse Covid provided for activists to push a huge expansion of mail-in voting—precisely the tool needed to enable untraceable fraud on a grand scale.

Chapter four moves on to the horrifying violence that engulfed major cities in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd at the knee of Derek Chauvin. The initial impressions of Floyd’s demise, now known to be not quite so simple, were seized by anti-police activists in the black community to advance their agenda. An agenda that is Marxist to its core, and contemptuous of American standards of justice. Mollie lays out point after point showing how the progressive movement’s vested interest in stopping Trump’s gains in minority communities led its politicians, media apologists, and social media censors to do everything they could to keep tensions simmering. And to hide the truth about Antifa and BLM activist behavior.

Chapter five covers the convention season, and how the lackluster “virtual” convention held by the Democrats was outshone by a very unconventional Republican convention. Unconventional because all the usual players were unavailable, and the Charlotte host site was effectively sabotaged by North Carolina’s Democrat governor. The good news for Trump could not be allowed to stand, and the mainstream news media leveraged conveniently anonymous sources to gin up a controversy over a canceled visit to a military cemetery in France. That numerous eyewitnesses contradicted the “sources”, insisting that Trump did not defame any soldiers, was ignored. Corrections to the record were naturally held until they could help Trump anymore. No apologies from Fake News, of course.

Chapter six describes the debate season and the journalist malpractice that surrounded it. Mollie highlights the shameful conduct of the Commission on Presidential Debates and points out that it is likely to have no future.

Chapter seven is a deep dive into Big Tech’s assistance to the progressive movement, with a particular focus on the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), Mark Zuckerberg’s vehicle for buying elections. Specifically, CTCL gave huge sums, with strings attached, to election boards around the country. The strings were basically to push mail-in voting to the max, and eliminate the signature matches, address checks, witness requirements, and any other anti-fraud measure that normally accompanies mail-in voting. And “cooperate” with CTCL “advisors”. Mollie documents how that meant CTCL running some elections. Georgia was the biggest recipient, at $31 million. More on that in chapter ten.

Chapter eight is all about Hunter. And all the trouble he creates for the Biden family while leading the family’s worldwide grift. Trouble that reflects poorly on his father, and so must be suppressed. Especially the classic October surprise: Hunter’s abandoned laptop with oodles of embarrassing and incriminating content. The journalistic malpractice (or to be more honest, malice) was breathtaking. Major media, big tech, and bureaucrats closed ranks to silence all news about this event. At least until the election was safely in Biden’s pocket. Yes, anyone inclined to bypass major news media for more trustworthy sources knew all about it, but the general public doesn’t do this. Numerous polls, after the fact, show that earlier knowledge of this scandal would have changed many Biden voters’ minds. More than enough to flip the result.

Chapter nine is about the legal and judicial shenanigans used in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania to suppress the Green Party and candidates that would siphon voter support on the left, plus an account of similar legal and judicial misconduct to suppress poll-watchers and post-election challenges to signature verification misconduct. The election boards in both states flouted state laws with impunity, thanks to sympathetic judges. Mollie throws stones at Rudy Guiliani, too. He disrupted Trump’s legal efforts quite badly, as Mollie explains.

The tenth and final chapter focuses on Georgia’s Fulton County and Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensburger. As a Georgia resident myself, much of this has been covered locally ad nauseam. However, one bit about Raffensburger’s stonewalling on FOIA requests, requests needed by Mark Davis, a local election integrity expert, for Trump’s legal challenges, left my jaw on the floor. I was already upset at Raffensburger for the outrageous consent agreement that changed mail-in ballot handling, but the sheer malice towards conservatism shown by the post-election conduct Mollie documents has me furious. Not to mention the mind-boggling revelation that Raffensburger’s right hand in the office is a clear Democrat activist.

Mollie adds a brief epilogue to tie it all back together.

I thoroughly enjoyed Mollie’s writing, and learned a few things I’d missed in the past year or so. I highly recommend you get your own copy.

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 315 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Snip——Byron York’s tweet, quoted above.

    This is infuriating. 😡 McCabe ought to be in a federal prison….. for a long while.

    If he had been in prison, Brandon could have just pardoned him.  Same result.

    • #271
  2. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

     

     

    • #272
  3. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

     

     

     

     

    Let’s go Brandon!

    • #273
  4. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    FYI. This is in my opinion a leading never Trumper on Twitter and he’s also part of Principles First.

    They whine about “morals” and then they analyze the electorate to get power back. ENDLESSLY, They never talk about novel policies, issues, or the state of our institutions. They are like robots from 30 and 40 years ago. It’s all boiler plate policy. I don’t see how this improves anything.

     

    It’s a whole thread that I’m talking about.

     

    What are your views?

    Sorry, I just can’t read NTers for content.

    • #274
  5. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    #NeverTrump.

    “McCabe will receive $200k in back pension payments. DOJ will pay his lawyers $500k. Gets honorary FBI retirement cufflinks, plaque. All records erased. Like it never happened.”

    Good argument for bringing back the Guillotine.

    Or long-term stocks.  Say, 15 to 20 in the stocks.

    • #275
  6. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    #NeverTrump.

    “McCabe will receive $200k in back pension payments. DOJ will pay his lawyers $500k. Gets honorary FBI retirement cufflinks, plaque. All records erased. Like it never happened.”

    Good argument for bringing back the Guillotine.

    Or long-term stocks. Say, 15 to 20 in the stocks.

    The organized never trump really thinks they are going to fix this someday.  

    • #276
  7. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    #NeverTrump.

    “McCabe will receive $200k in back pension payments. DOJ will pay his lawyers $500k. Gets honorary FBI retirement cufflinks, plaque. All records erased. Like it never happened.”

    Good argument for bringing back the Guillotine.

    Or long-term stocks. Say, 15 to 20 in the stocks.

    The organized never trump really thinks they are going to fix this someday.

    You get the unintended pun?

    • #277
  8. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Flicker (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    #NeverTrump.

    “McCabe will receive $200k in back pension payments. DOJ will pay his lawyers $500k. Gets honorary FBI retirement cufflinks, plaque. All records erased. Like it never happened.”

    Good argument for bringing back the Guillotine.

    Or long-term stocks. Say, 15 to 20 in the stocks.

    The organized never trump really thinks they are going to fix this someday.

    You get the unintended pun?

    Yes it’s pretty obvious. lol

    I just had an additional thought about all of this.

    • #278
  9. Mountie Coolidge
    Mountie
    @Mountie

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

     

    laws are for little people  

     

    • #279
  10. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Feel-good story for today: Adam Kinzinger Lashes Out After Democrats Redraw His House District, Likely Ending His Congressional Career (msn.com)

    • #280
  11. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Django (View Comment):
    Feel-good story for today: Adam Kinzinger Lashes Out After Democrats Redraw His House District, Likely Ending His Congressional Career (msn.com)

    Schadenfreude.

    • #281
  12. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    In the flagship Ricochet Podcast, Chris Christie pointed out that while Trump raised $1.2 billion for his re-election, he neglected to fund a coordinated legal campaign before the election.

    • #282
  13. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In the flagship Ricochet Podcast, Chris Christie pointed out that while Trump raised $1.2 billion for his re-election, he neglected to fund a coordinated legal campaign before the election.

    So? 

    • #283
  14. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Django (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In the flagship Ricochet Podcast, Chris Christie pointed out that while Trump raised $1.2 billion for his re-election, he neglected to fund a coordinated legal campaign before the election.

    So?

    I agree. What’s the point?  Is the point that Trump made a mistake?  Add it to the list.  But this doesn’t effect what I want to know.

    Continued:

    • #284
  15. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    (Continued)

    I want to know whether illegally cast or counted votes definitely exceeded the Biden margin of victory in PA, AZ, and NV like they definitely did in GA.

    I want to know if anyone has checked the Wisconsin Elections Commission database to confirm (or disconfirm) the presence of tens of thousands of fake/illegal/suspicious voters in WI.  I want to know how many of those entries in the database correspond to 2020 voters.  I want to know how many mail-in ballots in WI had addresses illegally added by elections officials.

    I want to know the name of the other witness Gregory Stenstrom cited–the Democrat observer who also saw 60-70k uncounted ballots in PA.  I want to know whether he backs up Stenstrom’s testimony.  I want to know whether the more-or-less-confirmed 50k votes in PA–a Stenstrom claim that survived a fact-check–with a bad chain of custody is a normal thing in PA.

    I want to know whether Maricopa Co. has any decent reason to act like criminals would act in their extreme resistance to the audit.  I want to know whether they have responses to the many, many other weird votes the audit found that (to my knowledge) they didn’t critique on Twitter.  I want to know more about the Conservative Daily Podcast critiques of the Twitter critiques the Co. did make.

    I want to know if Jesse Kamzol can give more details on his methodology for finding 42k double voters in NV.  I want to know if anyone has better objection to Kamzol’s 23k illegally cast out-of-state votes than the straw-man fallacy USA Today used on him.

    I want to know what we’d find if Mark Davis’ GA methodology were applied in every state.

    I want to know whether more sociological research on non-citizens voting illegally can confirm the Just Facts Daily claim (double the Biden margin of victory in illegally cast Biden votes in AZ and GA), or whether they would disconfirm or, or whether they’d actually strengthen it.

    I want to know how many of the illegally cast and counted votes in all these categories were for Biden.

    I want to know if any states have processes in place to make sure vote-counting devices can’t be accessed with a flash drive or have their internal modems switched on until witnesses from two parties are knowingly watching it happen, and after paper results of the count have been printed and reported.  I want to know if any states are taking the advice of the federal Election Assistance Commission and banning the machines with the internal modems.

    • #285
  16. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    That the PA electors were selected in a manner inconsistent with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress is not in doubt, a fact that the intellectual cowards at ricochet have yet to admit. 

    For emphasis: 

    Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: 

    Now, a former law professor answered a few questions I asked about why the SCOTUS didn’t intervene. I defer to his legal judgment, but that doesn’t change what I asserted above. There may be no legal recourse. Such is life. In 2022 and in 2024, the GOP must be prepared. I have no faith that the GOPe fools in charge will be. 

    • #286
  17. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Django (View Comment):

    That the PA electors were selected in a manner inconsistent with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress is not in doubt, a fact that the intellectual cowards at ricochet have yet to admit.

    For emphasis:

    Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress:

    Now, a former law professor answered a few questions I asked about why the SCOTUS didn’t intervene. I defer to his legal judgment, but that doesn’t change what I asserted above. There may be no legal recourse. Such is life. In 2022 and in 2024, the GOP must be prepared. I have no faith that the GOPe fools in charge will be.

    Heck, what happened in 2020 was exactly what the GOPe wanted!

    • #287
  18. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In the flagship Ricochet Podcast, Chris Christie pointed out that while Trump raised $1.2 billion for his re-election, he neglected to fund a coordinated legal campaign before the election.

    You post this after arguing about all the lawsuits he lost or that judges wouldn’t hear?  Don’t go there. Christie shouldn’t. What lawsuits was Christie blustering about. He had already said the Democrats won through legal means and not “shenanigans.”

    • #288
  19. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    That the PA electors were selected in a manner inconsistent with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress is not in doubt, a fact that the intellectual cowards at ricochet have yet to admit.

    For emphasis:

    Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress:

    Now, a former law professor answered a few questions I asked about why the SCOTUS didn’t intervene. I defer to his legal judgment, but that doesn’t change what I asserted above. There may be no legal recourse. Such is life. In 2022 and in 2024, the GOP must be prepared. I have no faith that the GOPe fools in charge will be.

    Heck, what happened in 2020 was exactly what the GOPe wanted!

    If  you mean getting rid of that trouble-making outsider, yes, that’s what they wanted. ‘eff ’em. 

    • #289
  20. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Django (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    That the PA electors were selected in a manner inconsistent with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress is not in doubt, a fact that the intellectual cowards at ricochet have yet to admit.

    For emphasis:

    Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress:

    Now, a former law professor answered a few questions I asked about why the SCOTUS didn’t intervene. I defer to his legal judgment, but that doesn’t change what I asserted above. There may be no legal recourse. Such is life. In 2022 and in 2024, the GOP must be prepared. I have no faith that the GOPe fools in charge will be.

    Heck, what happened in 2020 was exactly what the GOPe wanted!

    If you mean getting rid of that trouble-making outsider, yes, that’s what they wanted. ‘eff ’em.

    “Let’s Go, GOPe!” ?

    • #290
  21. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    kedavis (View Comment):
    “Let’s Go, GOPe!” ?

    Ditto

    • #291
  22. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I have listened to long interviews of Hans von Spakovsky. He blames the RNC and the GOP state legislators for not being on top of the Democrat electioneering. The heritage foundation tried to get their attention and they got nowhere. I don’t recall him ever talking about Trump. Furthermore, what Zuckerberg did was totally novel and he kept it under wraps until the middle of September. 

    The constitutional power is with the legislatures. The RNC is the party infrastructure for it. 

    I don’t see how this is a big score against Trump that outweighs so many other things.

    • #292
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    I have listened to long interviews of Hans von Spakovsky. He blames the RNC and the GOP state legislators for not being on top of the Democrat electioneering. The heritage foundation tried to get their attention and they got nowhere. I don’t recall him ever talking about Trump. Furthermore, what Zuckerberg did was totally novel and he kept it under wraps until the middle of September.

    The constitutional power is with the legislatures. The RNC is the party infrastructure for it.

    I don’t see how this is a big score against Trump that outweighs so many other things.

    It’s probably like the “insurrection” stuff, they put it on Trump because they already wanted him out and didn’t much care how it happened.

    • #293
  24. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

    Never Trump is effectively for this. lol

     

     

     

    • #294
  25. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

     

     

    • #295
  26. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

    Never Trump is effectively for this. lol

     

     

     

    And who was Vice President for 8 of those 15 years?

    • #296
  27. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Django (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In the flagship Ricochet Podcast, Chris Christie pointed out that while Trump raised $1.2 billion for his re-election, he neglected to fund a coordinated legal campaign before the election.

    So?

    A coordinated pre-election legal campaign was the responsibility of Ronna McDaniel and the RNC, it seems to me. Trump didn’t have enough to do? He was running the country, running for President, and running the battle against the Chinese pandemic. But I guess that’s not enough for @garyrobbins. He should have been running the legal campaign against the vile and cheating Democrats in an attempt to preserve our voting system as well. Don’t expect any help from the Republicans. Instead expect folks like Gary and his NT’s to stab the President in his back every chance they could get.

    • #297
  28. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    cdor (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In the flagship Ricochet Podcast, Chris Christie pointed out that while Trump raised $1.2 billion for his re-election, he neglected to fund a coordinated legal campaign before the election.

    So?

    A coordinated pre-election legal campaign was the responsibility of Ronna McDaniel and the RNC, it seems to me. Trump didn’t have enough to do? He was running the country, running for President, and running the battle against the Chinese pandemic. But I guess that’s not enough for @ garyrobbins. He should have been running the legal campaign against the vile and cheating Democrats in an attempt to preserve our voting system as well. Don’t expect any help from the Republicans. Instead expect folks like Gary and his NT’s to stab the President in his back every chance they could get.

    As is sometimes said, Trump lives rent-free in their heads 24/7/365. 

    The #NeverTrumpers Dig In – American Thinker

    • #298
  29. OmegaPaladin Moderator
    OmegaPaladin
    @OmegaPaladin

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Vince Guerra (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Who wants to refute him this time?

    Actually for once Gary has done us a service. If Gary thinks poorly of it (the George Castanza rule) then maybe it’s better than I suspected. Maybe I will check this one out.

    Good point, in that sense. But there’s so much NON-sense in what he wrote, it should be refuted. But a) I don’t have that kind of word limit, and b) I’m sick of it happening over and over.

    You can become a Reagan member, or you can take me on one paragraph at a time. Your choice.

    @garyrobbins do we really need to add a section in the Terms and Conditions or Code of Conduct about member-level snobbery?  Reagan members are members no different from any other member.   Trying to lord your Reagan membership over other people and pretend to be a moderator makes you look like a smug, petty tyrant.  I recall having to rather forcefully persuade you not to dox people walk into your office without wearing masks.   Is that the way you want to represent your ideas here?

    Please post essay-length material as a post on its own, rather than a comment.  I understand that you are all about following the letter of the law, but the CoC was not drafted by lawyers, and has some element of interpretation.  We normally take a light hand here, but this is ridiculous.  Please do not do this again, or the oversized comment will be deleted.

    • #299
  30. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):
    @garyrobbins do we really need to add a section in the Terms and Conditions or Code of Conduct about member-level snobbery?  Reagan members are members no different from any other member.   Trying to lord your Reagan membership over other people and pretend to be a moderator makes you look like a smug, petty tyrant.  I recall having to rather forcefully persuade you not to dox people walk into your office without wearing masks.   Is that the way you want to represent your ideas here?

    There is an interesting thing about constitutions Codes of Conduct. They are written for laymen to follow. You know, the rest of us – hoi polloi et al.

    One does not need a court Moderator to rule to see whether an action by the State a member is unconstitutional compliant or not, one can read the plain language.

    In fact – it requires a lawyer (family or not) to twist constitutional requirements the CoC in such a manner to get to the opposite meaning.

    Case in point. A right to keep and bear arms “may not be infringed” yet, today I may go to Texas from Louisiana, purchase a car and drive it home the same day. Thanks to lawyers, I may not do the same with a gun. Somehow my constitutional right to “keep and bear arms” has been infringed to the degree that of all the property I might own, only the one that I have a constitutional right to own is infringed if I travel outside my state. A member posts an obscenely long comment (see @omegapaladin ‘s comment above).

    So I can read the requirements for absentee voting in Pennsylvania and I can read the process to amend the Pennsylvania Constitution to permit mail in voting obscenely long comment and I can see that the process CoC wasn’t followed. Then I can assert that such changes behavior were is “unconstitutional” noncompliant.

    • #300
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.