Bill Maher: ’10 Years Ago … the Left Did Not Have a Crazy Section’

 

On a recent episode of MSNBC host Joe Scarborough’s podcast, comedian Bill Maher said that the political diversity of his audiences was changing.m”For the first time in my life, I am playing to a mixed audience,” Maher said. “I was in Nashville about a month ago, and the audience was about 60-40 liberal to conservative.”

“That never used to happen — never — I think it’s because 10 years ago, in my opinion anyway, the left did not have a crazy section,” Maher explained. “There was no such thing as woke, and now they do have a crazy section, which I call out as a liberal. I think I’m kind of one of the only people doing that, so there’s a hunger to hear that.”

“I think traditional liberals have had it with the far left of their own party, and they enjoy this too,” he added. “To be able to play to a crowd like I did in Nashville that’s almost split even … never happened before. The audience was almost all completely liberal, but things have changed.”

Scarborough, who spews hatred toward conservatives every day for a living, told his guest, “God, we need so much more of that. We have to have this country come together again. Unless you solve the hate problem, you will never solve any of our political problems. … When somebody just hates the other person, you don’t even listen to what they say, and you won’t even entertain what their point is. As long as we are in this place where I just hate this other side, nothing is going to change.”

Maher is correct. The far-left wing of the Democratic Party has gone stark-raving mad over the past several years. The problem is that much of the party has gone along with it.

Here are some examples from recent headlines:

1. California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill to enact the Menstrual Equity for All Act of 2021. This law requires all public schools and universities to provide free menstrual products to students in all restrooms, including boys’ restrooms. 

Yes really.

2. On Friday, Newsom signed a bill, AB 101, into law. High school students must now pass an ethnic studies course in order to graduate.

According to Cal Matters:

Specific lessons include “Migration Stories and Oral History,” “#BlackLivesMatter and Social Change,” “Afrofuturism: Reimagining Black Futures and Science Fiction,” and “US Undocumented Immigrants from Mexico and Beyond.” …

3. A UCLA accounting professor is fighting back after being suspended for not granting “racially preferential grading to black students in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis while in police custody.”

I could cite hundreds of equally crazy stories. Do these people wonder why they’ve become fodder for comedians on the left and the right?

The new religion of wokeness would actually be amusing if it weren’t taking over American culture and destroying the fabric of our society.

Wokeness in America been simmering for years, revealing itself from time to time, for example, in the reaction to the death Michael Brown in 2014 and in the “me too” movement of 2017. But it wasn’t until the death of George Floyd in May 2020 that it exploded into the open.

Floyd’s death wasn’t actually the cause; it was simply the catalyst for all-out warfare. The cries of racial justice began with an intensity we hadn’t witnessed since the civil rights movement of the 1960s. It made no difference that conditions for blacks had improved greatly since that time.

And the left was delighted by the riots and the unrest that instantly spread throughout the country months ahead of the 2020 presidential election. It played into their strategy to paint then-President Donald Trump as a racist which was a real plan conceived of and promoted by the New York Times in August 2019. (Read: The Introduction of Race as a Central Issue in American Politics Can Be Traced to an Aug 2019 Staff Meeting at The NY Times.)

In a recent op-ed, historian Victor Davis Hanson calls wokeness “the evil of our age” and notes that “even the Chinese apparat could not invent a more evil, more macabre way to destroy the United States.”

He cites historical examples of civilizations that “abruptly committed suicide” after “collective madness” had gripped their citizenry.

The Jacobins in 1793 hijacked the French Revolution and turned a movement toward a constitutional republic into a totalitarian, year-zero effort to destroy the past and ensure equity for all—or else. The Reign of Terror—and eventually Napoleon—followed.

The effort to force war-weary Czarist Russia to reform into a constitutional monarchy ended up being kidnapped by a small but lethal clique of Leninist Bolsheviks. What ensued was the destruction of Russian life—and millions of corpses—over the next 70 years. Ditto Mao Zedong’s various murderous resets culminating in the cannibalistic “Cultural Revolution.” Mao’s final tab was 60-70 million deaths of his fellow Chinese.

And these historical figures used the same tactics that the woke are using today. They “toppled statues, canceled out the nonbelievers, [and] wiped away history.”

“Most of these bloodbaths started out with the supposedly noble idea of delivering social justice, equity, and fairness before they inevitably went deadly and feral,” Hanson points out.

Is there really any reason why America’s foray into wokeism will end any differently?

The left’s “crazy section” is not funny. Adherents to this dangerous ideology are methodically putting the U.S. on a course of self-destruction. The evil of wokeness has infiltrated every American institution, even the US military, and unless it can be eradicated (and soon) and completely discredited, it will end in our demise.

Please visit my archives.

Please follow me on Twitter.

Published in Culture
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 94 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    Brian Boyce (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Brian M Boyce (View Comment):

    “[S]omeone not schooled in the art of the lie.” Did you mean Donald J. Trump? If so, I think I am going to go cut myself.

    It depends on what you call a lie. If you mean an attempt to deceive for the purpose of getting wasn’t a lie. But in office Trump never deceived to mislead people in order to get them to agree to anything that I can think of.

    Maybe you can name one attempt by Trump to deceive while in office.

    One very serious attempt to deceive in office: (A bunch of lies that constituted an attempt to steal the election) – He said that massive fraud was responsible for his losing the election. This was and is a lie that he attempted to perpetrate on the American people while in office. He then, using this lie as his reasoning, attempted to pressure state Republican officials to certify that he had actually won, not the person who won the most votes in those states. He then attempted to have various GOP legislators in various states send a competing set of electors to DC for the official certification on December 14, 2020. He failed. He continued to lie to us saying that the election was stolen and then unsuccessfully pressured his VP to throw sand in the gears of the counting of votes on January 6, 2021.

    If this is your leading candidate for “Trump Lies”, then he should get the George Washington award. I realize that you disagree with the claim, but this fact is very much disputed. You must admit that if a successful coup had been carried out, by either side, then by definition, that group would be in power, and the other side’s efforts would be widely seen as illegitimate. This is the nature of coups.

    I realize that I am begging the question a bit here, but just to point out that you are doing so writ large. A better example would be, well, better.

    An easy answer would be to have transparent elections that had easy auditioning methods so all can be sure of and election, but that seems to be beyond the pale for our country. I would suggest Former Ricochet allumi Mollie Hemingway’s book on what was done and how it was done. I suspect it is not totally complete in its listing of corruption but it may help point it out to you.

     

     

    If only Mollie was a trannie, then that book might get a mention or two on legacy media!

    But how could she explain having had children?

    • #91
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    Brian Boyce (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Brian M Boyce (View Comment):

    “[S]omeone not schooled in the art of the lie.” Did you mean Donald J. Trump? If so, I think I am going to go cut myself.

    It depends on what you call a lie. If you mean an attempt to deceive for the purpose of getting wasn’t a lie. But in office Trump never deceived to mislead people in order to get them to agree to anything that I can think of.

    Maybe you can name one attempt by Trump to deceive while in office.

    One very serious attempt to deceive in office: (A bunch of lies that constituted an attempt to steal the election) – He said that massive fraud was responsible for his losing the election. This was and is a lie that he attempted to perpetrate on the American people while in office. He then, using this lie as his reasoning, attempted to pressure state Republican officials to certify that he had actually won, not the person who won the most votes in those states. He then attempted to have various GOP legislators in various states send a competing set of electors to DC for the official certification on December 14, 2020. He failed. He continued to lie to us saying that the election was stolen and then unsuccessfully pressured his VP to throw sand in the gears of the counting of votes on January 6, 2021.

    If this is your leading candidate for “Trump Lies”, then he should get the George Washington award. I realize that you disagree with the claim, but this fact is very much disputed. You must admit that if a successful coup had been carried out, by either side, then by definition, that group would be in power, and the other side’s efforts would be widely seen as illegitimate. This is the nature of coups.

    I realize that I am begging the question a bit here, but just to point out that you are doing so writ large. A better example would be, well, better.

    An easy answer would be to have transparent elections that had easy auditioning methods so all can be sure of and election, but that seems to be beyond the pale for our country. I would suggest Former Ricochet allumi Mollie Hemingway’s book on what was done and how it was done. I suspect it is not totally complete in its listing of corruption but it may help point it out to you.

    If only Mollie was a trannie, then that book might get a mention or two on legacy media!

    But how could she explain having had children?

    Women can have children, too.

    • #92
  3. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    Brian Boyce (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Brian M Boyce (View Comment):

    “[S]omeone not schooled in the art of the lie.” Did you mean Donald J. Trump? If so, I think I am going to go cut myself.

    It depends on what you call a lie. If you mean an attempt to deceive for the purpose of getting wasn’t a lie. But in office Trump never deceived to mislead people in order to get them to agree to anything that I can think of.

    Maybe you can name one attempt by Trump to deceive while in office.

    One very serious attempt to deceive in office: (A bunch of lies that constituted an attempt to steal the election) – He said that massive fraud was responsible for his losing the election. This was and is a lie that he attempted to perpetrate on the American people while in office. He then, using this lie as his reasoning, attempted to pressure state Republican officials to certify that he had actually won, not the person who won the most votes in those states. He then attempted to have various GOP legislators in various states send a competing set of electors to DC for the official certification on December 14, 2020. He failed. He continued to lie to us saying that the election was stolen and then unsuccessfully pressured his VP to throw sand in the gears of the counting of votes on January 6, 2021.

    If this is your leading candidate for “Trump Lies”, then he should get the George Washington award. I realize that you disagree with the claim, but this fact is very much disputed. You must admit that if a successful coup had been carried out, by either side, then by definition, that group would be in power, and the other side’s efforts would be widely seen as illegitimate. This is the nature of coups.

    I realize that I am begging the question a bit here, but just to point out that you are doing so writ large. A better example would be, well, better.

    An easy answer would be to have transparent elections that had easy auditioning methods so all can be sure of and election, but that seems to be beyond the pale for our country. I would suggest Former Ricochet allumi Mollie Hemingway’s book on what was done and how it was done. I suspect it is not totally complete in its listing of corruption but it may help point it out to you.

    If only Mollie was a trannie, then that book might get a mention or two on legacy media!

    But how could she explain having had children?

    Women can have children, too.

    But if she was trans, that means she only recently became a woman.

    • #93
  4. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    Brian Boyce (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    It depends on what you call a lie. If you mean an attempt to deceive for the purpose of getting wasn’t a lie. But in office Trump never deceived to mislead people in order to get them to agree to anything that I can think of.

    Maybe you can name one attempt by Trump to deceive while in office.

    One very serious attempt to deceive in office: (A bunch of lies that constituted an attempt to steal the election) – He said that massive fraud was responsible for his losing the election. This was and is a lie that he attempted to perpetrate on the American people while in office. He then, using this lie as his reasoning, attempted to pressure state Republican officials to certify that he had actually won, not the person who won the most votes in those states. He then attempted to have various GOP legislators in various states send a competing set of electors to DC for the official certification on December 14, 2020. He failed. He continued to lie to us saying that the election was stolen and then unsuccessfully pressured his VP to throw sand in the gears of the counting of votes on January 6, 2021.

    If this is your leading candidate for “Trump Lies”, then he should get the George Washington award. I realize that you disagree with the claim, but this fact is very much disputed. You must admit that if a successful coup had been carried out, by either side, then by definition, that group would be in power, and the other side’s efforts would be widely seen as illegitimate. This is the nature of coups.

    I realize that I am begging the question a bit here, but just to point out that you are doing so writ large. A better example would be, well, better.

    An easy answer would be to have transparent elections that had easy auditioning methods so all can be sure of and election, but that seems to be beyond the pale for our country. I would suggest Former Ricochet allumi Mollie Hemingway’s book on what was done and how it was done. I suspect it is not totally complete in its listing of corruption but it may help point it out to you.

    If only Mollie was a trannie, then that book might get a mention or two on legacy media!

    But how could she explain having had children?

    Women can have children, too.

    But if she was trans, that means she only recently became a woman.

    I’m losing track.  How many sexes are there?  And how many has Molly been through?

    • #94
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.