The Real Problem Is: We are Losing

 

Anyone on the right can look back at the last 50 years and see the long string of losses to the left. They have set the agenda and they have set the direction. A Republican made nice with China and took us off the gold standard. While Reagan won the Cold War and cut taxes, everything else on the domestic front went the Left’s way. Bush and Clinton both raised taxes. Deficit spending has been the way of the nation in almost every year I have been alive. We no longer need any sort of war to spend and spend. Each President of the last generation more than doubled the previous president’s debt.

The Left controls all the big companies, all the universities, and thanks to the administrative state, they write all the new rules that are effectively laws. From Sea to Shining Sea, the Left has moved from victory to victory, and the Right goes from defeat to defeat. I will admit we have made progress on guns, but that looks to be a lot less safe a win for the Right, than say Obamacare was for the Left.

Who do I blame? Conservatism, Inc. for signing on to the Globalism vision. We are now dependent on China, an avowed enemy, for too many vital goods and services. We have gone from a nation of manufacturing to a nation of service employees. We are losing the Republic and we are losing against China, which will soon eclipse us in every way possible. I expect my children will be my age in a world dominated by China.

Of course the people at Conservatism, Inc. will long be dead.

.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 107 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Stina Inactive
    Stina
    @CM

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    Dismantle much of higher education.  This could probably be accomplished simply by denying subsidies.

    This I think could gain political clout with a student debt jubilee (or re-enstatement of student loan bankruptcy) and moving student loans back to the private sector (no more federal backed loans or guaranteed loans).

    • #31
  2. E. Kent Golding Moderator
    E. Kent Golding
    @EKentGolding

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Bryan,

    Some of your other posts have convinced me that you are a dedicated Christian. Read your New Testament. Clearly, it is supposed to get worse until Christ comes again. And it is. Doesn’t relieve us of our responsibility to try to further the Kingdom of God, and to evangelize those with ears to hear. But it is going to get worse. Until Christ comes again.

    I don’t think the end times are near. People have been saying that forever.

    I mean, eventually they’ll be right, but the track record is dismal.

    You are both right.    However,  things can get much much worse ( and they will ) and eventually the end times will come  ( and they will ).    Not for me to know ,  and God seems to operate on his own timescale.

    • #32
  3. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Bryan,

    Some of your other posts have convinced me that you are a dedicated Christian. Read your New Testament. Clearly, it is supposed to get worse until Christ comes again. And it is. Doesn’t relieve us of our responsibility to try to further the Kingdom of God, and to evangelize those with ears to hear. But it is going to get worse. Until Christ comes again.

    I don’t think the end times are near. People have been saying that forever.

    I mean, eventually they’ll be right, but the track record is dismal.

    You are both right. However, things can get much much worse ( and they will ) and eventually the end times will come ( and they will ). Not for me to know , and God seems to operate on his own timescale.

    That’s why I am generally uninterested in arguments about creation or Revelation. Beginnings and Endings are all clouded in mystery and I’m perfectly fine with that.

    • #33
  4. Dotorimuk Coolidge
    Dotorimuk
    @Dotorimuk

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):
    Reagan ran horrible deficits

    He really did. It went straight up from there and we never looked back.

    Walter Williams frequently raked Reagan over the coals for this.

    • #34
  5. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Bryan,

    Some of your other posts have convinced me that you are a dedicated Christian. Read your New Testament. Clearly, it is supposed to get worse until Christ comes again. And it is. Doesn’t relieve us of our responsibility to try to further the Kingdom of God, and to evangelize those with ears to hear. But it is going to get worse. Until Christ comes again.

    I don’t think the end times are near. People have been saying that forever.

    I mean, eventually they’ll be right, but the track record is dismal.

    You are both right. However, things can get much much worse ( and they will ) and eventually the end times will come ( and they will ). Not for me to know , and God seems to operate on his own timescale.

    That’s why I am generally uninterested in arguments about creation or Revelation. Beginnings and Endings are all clouded in mystery and I’m perfectly fine with that.

    yep

    • #35
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Who do I blame? Conservatism, Inc. for signing on to the Globalism vision. We are now dependent on China, an avowed enemy, for too many vital goods and services. We have gone from a nation of manufacturing to a nation of service employees. We are losing the Republic and we are losing against China, which will soon eclipse us in every way possible. I expect my children will be my age in a world dominated by China.

    Of course the people at Conservatism, Inc. will long be dead.

    While their descendants will still be wealthy from the inheritances brought about by selling the rest of us down the river.

    • #36
  7. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Who do I blame? Conservatism, Inc. for signing on to the Globalism vision. We are now dependent on China, an avowed enemy, for too many vital goods and services. We have gone from a nation of manufacturing to a nation of service employees. We are losing the Republic and we are losing against China, which will soon eclipse us in every way possible. I expect my children will be my age in a world dominated by China.

    Of course the people at Conservatism, Inc. will long be dead.

    While their descendants will still be wealthy from the inheritances brought about by selling the rest of us down the river.

    I’m more inclined to blame the progressive’s long march through the institutions, but if the stabbed-in-the-back idea is a boat-floater, fine. I think you overestimate China, which is currently experiencing multiple self-administered groin kicks, and lacks the systemic flexibility to respond wisely. It’s all about Xi now. The illusion of the Possible China is falling away. 

    You think your kids will listen to Chinese music? Watch Chinese TV shows? Play Wolf Warrior video games? Want to spend a vacation there? Can you name any nation that wants Chinese culture to replace its own? 

     

    • #37
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Who do I blame? Conservatism, Inc. for signing on to the Globalism vision. We are now dependent on China, an avowed enemy, for too many vital goods and services. We have gone from a nation of manufacturing to a nation of service employees. We are losing the Republic and we are losing against China, which will soon eclipse us in every way possible. I expect my children will be my age in a world dominated by China.

    Of course the people at Conservatism, Inc. will long be dead.

    While their descendants will still be wealthy from the inheritances brought about by selling the rest of us down the river.

    I’m more inclined to blame the progressive’s long march through the institutions, but if the stabbed-in-the-back idea is a boat-floater, fine. I think you overestimate China, which is currently experiencing multiple self-administered groin kicks, and lacks the systemic flexibility to respond wisely. It’s all about Xi now. The illusion of the Possible China is falling away.

    You think your kids will listen to Chinese music? Watch Chinese TV shows? Play Wolf Warrior video games? Want to spend a vacation there? Can you name any nation that wants Chinese culture to replace its own?

     

    That last part was me, not Bryan.

    • #38
  9. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    You think your kids will listen to Chinese music? Watch Chinese TV shows? Play Wolf Warrior video games? Want to spend a vacation there? Can you name any nation that wants Chinese culture to replace its own? 

    We’re already eating Chinese food.  (And listening to KPop [banned in China?].)

    But seriously, nobody wants another nation’s culture to replace their own. 

    • #39
  10. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Dotorimuk (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):
    Reagan ran horrible deficits

    He really did. It went straight up from there and we never looked back.

    Walter Williams frequently raked Reagan over the coals for this.

    I really wish somebody would tell me what is wrong with that David Stockman video I tell everybody to watch. Most Republicans hate him, but he seems pretty on target to me.

    • #40
  11. Guruforhire Inactive
    Guruforhire
    @Guruforhire

    Stina (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    Dismantle much of higher education. This could probably be accomplished simply by denying subsidies.

    This I think could gain political clout with a student debt jubilee (or re-enstatement of student loan bankruptcy) and moving student loans back to the private sector (no more federal backed loans or guaranteed loans).

    I posted 2-3 years ago attempting to make a relevant right of center agenda but nobody on the right wants to do stuff.

    • Vary student loan interest rates based upon outcomes of the school
    • Limit student loans only to those programs that provide public utility via legislation.

    We don’t have to pay for neo-neo-nazism, when what we really want is engineers and scientists.

    States could enforce anti-discrimination laws against woke corporations.

    States could pass more aggressive voucher programs

     

    We desperately need to reform copyright laws relative to the modern internet.

    • #41
  12. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

     

    • #42
  13. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    We did every single thing wrong in the face of automation and globalized trade. It’s way too late to respond to this with textbook libertarian free trade. It’s a very thorny topic and I think the answers are probably found in Steve Bannon interviews. 

    I loathe talking about the electorate like so many do, but this is an opportunity.

     

    Democrats lost significant support in small-to-medium cities and towns in the Midwest which have been gutted by the decades-long globalization of the American economy.

    The analysis called “Factory Towns” by Democrat strategists, partially detailed in the New York Times before its release, reveals the extent to which America’s working- and middle-class communities in the heartland of the nation have drifted from the Democrat Party.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/10/06/analysis-democrats-lose-midwest-towns-gutted-globalization/

     

     

    • #43
  14. MWD B612 "Dawg" Member
    MWD B612 "Dawg"
    @danok1

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    I was in a minor argument with my kid brother the other day about whether normal Americans are silent about stuff like this primarily out of fear of losing their jobs, or if it has more to do with our natural tendency to be reasonably polite and nonconfrontational. I think it’s mostly the latter, and that that’s something that has to change.

    Do most people have a strong opinion, one way or the other?

    I’d say “Yes, they do.” At least among my peers.

    We can see with our own eyes the denial of actual, physical reality that the trans/”gender fluidity” folks push on us. They demand we say the lie is actually the truth. I thin Henry has an excellent point though: most of us were brought up to be polite, so we refrain from pointing out that the man who says he’s a woman is actually a man, no matter how much mutilation he undergoes.

    • #44
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    WILL THERE BE A QUIZ? lol

    Launch of the Rainbow honours the achievements and contributions of McGill University’s 2SLGBTQIA+ students. The acronym 2SLGBTQIA+ refers to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer, Two-Spirit, Intersex, and Asexual peoples, as well as those who identify as pansexual, questioning, non-binary, and other gender and sexual minorities. 

    Recognizing the importance of intersectionality, the Subcommittee on Queer People is committed to an organizing process and event that foregrounds the voices and experiences of 2SLGBTQIA+ people who are most marginalized, both in society and within 2SLGBTQIA+ communities, including 2SLGBTQIA+ people who are racialized, Indigenous, Black, trans, women, non-binary, and persons with disabilities. 

     https://www.mcgill.ca/queerequity/events/launch-rainbow

    • #45
  16. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    We were the only major bottom up country on earth and that is what created the modern world.  The top can’t run matters except in their own interest.  They have to compromise with others at the top and they have to pretend about the rest.  The naive liberal but sincere belief in human perfectibility drives it but it hasn’t ever existed and won’t.   Our founders purposely choose to run matters from the bottom up and that created the modern world.   Centralization is natural, it’s what happens and it will return the world to decline and while the Chinese are good at running matters top down, they too will rot and decline but not until they have helped us destroy ourselves.  We can fix it but only by pulling out, as a minimum having a credible threat to do so, leaving Washington to run the rest. 

    • #46
  17. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    Can you name any nation that wants Chinese culture to replace its own?

    I can name some Americans who think it’s an awesome idea.

    Zafar (View Comment):
    But seriously, nobody wants another nation’s culture to replace their own.

    Southern border disagrees.

    • #47
  18. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    So… what should we do?

    Someone provide some constructive suggestions.

    Burn the GOP to the ground. Build a new party from actual conservatives.

    Drew, this doesn’t seem like a good strategy to me.

    You’re a pretty pro-Trump guy, right? I am. About 90% of Republicans seem to be on board with the bulk of this agenda.

    I do understand that we have a problem with about 10% of Republicans, and that they tend to be overrepresented among the conservative intelligentsia. I think that a better strategy is to convert them to our cause, or at least to convince them that they’ll get more of what they want in alliance with us than in alliance with the Democrats.

    This 10% believes in Conservatism, but not in Donald John Trump.  I will vote for any Republican (other than Donald John Trump) over any Democrat, but any Democrat over Donald John Trump.  The mounting evidence of Donald John Trump trying to steal the election and his efforts to pressure the DoJ, and local officials disqualify Donald John Trump.

    The Republican Party and Conservatism is so much more than just one person.

    I think most of them will come around. My buddy Gary Robbins actually seems to be coming around, slowly.

    It is now clear that Biden has been co-opted by the Progressives.  He could have triangulated like Bill Clinton; he hasn’t.  What a disappointment.

    • #48
  19. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The mounting evidence of Donald John Trump trying to steal the election and his efforts to pressure the DoJ, and local officials disqualify Donald John Trump.

    I’m guessing you’re not keeping up with the news. The garbage you cite — lies about “trying to steal the election” or “efforts to pressure the DOJ” has just been officially debunked.

    Of course, we already knew this, but now it’s official.

     

    • #49
  20. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    This 10% believes in Conservatism, but not in Donald John Trump. 

    You could pitch the Principles First platform here. 

    Also notice the prior discussion about this topic, what is conservatism?

     

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    It is now clear that Biden has been co-opted by the Progressives.  He could have triangulated like Bill Clinton; he hasn’t.  What a disappointment.

    Everything Moves Towards Communism All Of The Time™

    • #50
  21. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Who do I blame? Conservatism, Inc. for signing on to the Globalism vision. We are now dependent on China, an avowed enemy, for too many vital goods and services. We have gone from a nation of manufacturing to a nation of service employees. We are losing the Republic and we are losing against China, which will soon eclipse us in every way possible. I expect my children will be my age in a world dominated by China.

    Of course the people at Conservatism, Inc. will long be dead.

    While their descendants will still be wealthy from the inheritances brought about by selling the rest of us down the river.

    I’m more inclined to blame the progressive’s long march through the institutions, but if the stabbed-in-the-back idea is a boat-floater, fine. I think you overestimate China, which is currently experiencing multiple self-administered groin kicks, and lacks the systemic flexibility to respond wisely. It’s all about Xi now. The illusion of the Possible China is falling away. 

    You think your kids will listen to Chinese music? Watch Chinese TV shows? Play Wolf Warrior video games? Want to spend a vacation there? Can you name any nation that wants Chinese culture to replace its own?

    @jameslileks You are attributing to me in a quote something I did not say. I have a real problem with that. I did not accuse anyone of “selling the rest of us down the river”. Can you actually respond to me, and not add a line? Is that not important to someone in the news business? Sure, it sounds like I am going with “Stabbed-in-the-back” with that line, but, I did not say that! 

    I think that Conservatism, Inc. has been incompetent in stopping the progressive’s long march through the institutions. In no way is that “Stabbed-in-the-back”, but hey, whatever argument floats your boat and lets you be utterly and totally dismissive of my point, I guess all is fair. I get that you are a witty man, but for God’s sake, at least quote me correctly, not make stuff up that I did not say! 

    We can disagree on China. China is eating our lunch around the world. I don’t think that China culture is going to just roll over ours as China. What I see happening is the China authoritarianism has already won over the elites in this nation. We now live where conservatives are seen as more of a threat of the nation than actual terrorists. Very Chinese. I believe China is in the process of moving us from an American unipolar world to a bipolar one, with them at the other side. Right this moment we are a generation away from being able to produce vital things in this nation (like circuit boards) because we have followed a globalism path.

    I am happy to disagree with you on something, but I’ll be damned if I take it lying down when you quote me and literally put words in my mouth. 

    • #51
  22. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens
    • #52
  23. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The mounting evidence of Donald John Trump trying to steal the election and his efforts to pressure the DoJ, and local officials disqualify Donald John Trump.

    I’m guessing you’re not keeping up with the news. The garbage you cite — lies about “trying to steal the election” or “efforts to pressure the DOJ” has just been officially debunked.

    That is the minority report of the Republicans.  That is not an official debunking.

    Of course, we already knew this, but now it’s official.

    Not official.  A different point of view.

    • #53
  24. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    That is the minority report of the Republicans.  That is not an official debunking.

     

    The very same non-Trump Republicans you claimed a few comments back to support.

    • #54
  25. WI Con Member
    WI Con
    @WICon

    Stina (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    Dismantle much of higher education. This could probably be accomplished simply by denying subsidies.

    This I think could gain political clout with a student debt jubilee (or re-enstatement of student loan bankruptcy) and moving student loans back to the private sector (no more federal backed loans or guaranteed loans).

    With all the money being printed and incomprehensible spending- I could get behind some type of arbitration on reducing/settling student loans where:

    1) loan isn’t fully forgiven

    2) that institution producing graduates with lots of debt and dismal job prospects have current and future Federal loans to those institutions reduced by that forgiven amount.  Those departments or majors (women’s studies and black studies) with high default rates get penalized.

    3) a portion of these funds and university/college endowments are available for retraining of borrower.

    I could envision something similar with high school funding and HS drop outs or students eventually earning a GED.

    BIG Education needs it’s wings clipped severely.

    • #55
  26. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The mounting evidence of Donald John Trump trying to steal the election and his efforts to pressure the DoJ, and local officials disqualify Donald John Trump.

    I’m guessing you’re not keeping up with the news. The garbage you cite — lies about “trying to steal the election” or “efforts to pressure the DOJ” has just been officially debunked.

    Of course, we already knew this, but now it’s official.

     

    And Biden telling the DoJ/FBI/etc to go after parents who are unhappy with their school boards, nothing to worry about, right Gary?  Because at least it’s not Trump.

    • #56
  27. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    It is now clear that Biden has been co-opted by the Progressives.  He could have triangulated like Bill Clinton; he hasn’t.  What a disappointment.

    It’s NOW clear?  Some of us have known that for a long time.  Where were YOU?

    • #57
  28. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The mounting evidence of Donald John Trump trying to steal the election and his efforts to pressure the DoJ, and local officials disqualify Donald John Trump.

    I’m guessing you’re not keeping up with the news. The garbage you cite — lies about “trying to steal the election” or “efforts to pressure the DOJ” has just been officially debunked.

    That is the minority report of the Republicans.

    In other words, any Republican who tries to debunk the Democrats’ narrative about President Trump will be dismissed by you, because clinging to the Democrats’ anti-Trump narrative is the only thing that keeps you going.

    Even Senate fixture Chuck Grassley (first elected in 1980) is now too Trumpy for Gary.

    Which kind of makes you wonder . . . is Gary really a Republican?

    • #58
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The mounting evidence of Donald John Trump trying to steal the election and his efforts to pressure the DoJ, and local officials disqualify Donald John Trump.

    I’m guessing you’re not keeping up with the news. The garbage you cite — lies about “trying to steal the election” or “efforts to pressure the DOJ” has just been officially debunked.

    That is the minority report of the Republicans.

    In other words, any Republican who tries to debunk the Democrats’ narrative about President Trump will be dismissed by you, because clinging to the Democrats’ anti-Trump narrative is the only thing that keeps you going.

    Even Senate fixture Chuck Grassley (first elected in 1980) is now too Trumpy for Gary.

    Which kind of makes you wonder . . . is Gary really a Republican?

    Gary might like to say “it’s now become clear…” but a lot of us have known for a long time…

    • #59
  30. DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) Coolidge
    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!)
    @DonG

    Stina (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    Dismantle much of higher education. This could probably be accomplished simply by denying subsidies.

    This I think could gain political clout with a student debt jubilee (or re-enstatement of student loan bankruptcy) and moving student loans back to the private sector (no more federal backed loans or guaranteed loans).

    Yikes!   A debt jubilee is a moral hazard and that makes it anti-conservative.   It is like having working class folks bail out hedge funds, when they make bad bets. 

    I think the way to fix higher education is to only have government loans for education that the market demands.   The BLS has data and most of the job demand does not require a 4year degree.

     

    2020 National Employment Matrix title

    2020 National Employment Matrix code

    Employment, 2020

    Employment, 2030

    Employment

    change, 

    2020–30

    Percent employment change,  2020–30

    Median annual wage, 2020(1)

    Total, all occupations

    Motion picture projectionists

    Wind turbine service technicians

    Ushers, lobby attendants, and ticket takers

    Nurse practitioners

    Solar photovoltaic installers

    Cooks, restaurant

    Agents and business managers of artists, performers, and athletes

    Costume attendants

    Exercise trainers and group fitness instructors

    Model makers, wood

    Athletes and sports competitors

    Makeup artists, theatrical and performance

    Occupational therapy assistants

    Statisticians

    Entertainment attendants and related workers, all other

    Physical therapist assistants

    Animal caretakers

    Miscellaneous entertainers and performers, sports and related workers

    Information security analysts

    Film and video editors

    Manicurists and pedicurists

    00-0000

    153,533.8

    165,413.7

    11,879.9

    7.7

    $41,950

    39-3021

    1.7

    2.9

    1.2

    70.5

    $27,490

    49-9081

    6.9

    11.7

    4.7

    68.2

    $56,230

    39-3031

    81.5

    131.9

    50.4

    61.8

    $25,110

    29-1171

    220.3

    335.2

    114.9

    52.2

    $111,680

    47-2231

    11.8

    17.9

    6.1

    52.1

    $46,470

    35-2014

    1,153.2

    1,716.7

    563.5

    48.9

    $28,800

    13-1011

    18.7

    27.3

    8.6

    46.3

    $75,420

    39-3092

    5.4

    7.7

    2.4

    44.3

    $42,910

    39-9031

    309.8

    431.4

    121.7

    39.3

    $40,510

    51-7031

    1.0

    1.3

    0.4

    38.6

    $64,050

    27-2021

    16.7

    23.0

    6.3

    38.0

    $50,850

    39-5091

    3.1

    4.2

    1.1

    37.0

    $106,920

    31-2011

    43.3

    58.9

    15.6

    36.1

    $62,940

    15-2041

    42.0

    56.9

    14.9

    35.4

    $92,270

    39-3099

    3.9

    5.3

    1.4

    35.4

    $27,230

    31-2021

    93.8

    126.9

    33.2

    35.4

    $59,770

    39-2021

    272.4

    366.1

    93.6

    34.4

    $26,080

    27-2090

    33.7

    45.2

    11.4

    33.8

    15-1212

    141.2

    188.3

    47.1

    33.3

    $103,590

    27-4032

    33.0

    43.9

    11.0

    33.2

    $67,250

    39-5092

    123.0

    163.1

    40.1

    32.6

    $27,870

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.