While We Were Sleeping

 

The alarming thing has nothing to do with health or elections or wars. The alarming thing is the control of lies. It would be nice if we could eliminate all the lies and have nothing but truth left, as that would clear a lot of things up. The problem and what makes it the alarming thing is, who gets to decide?

YouTube announced it is removing accounts it considers to be providing misinformation. It could be right, and maybe it is misinformation. If it is, it should be removed, or should it? I think it probably has a right under its terms of use. But should it remove information, even if it’s proven to be bad information?

I’ve considered this quite a bit of late, and as much as I would like to see only the truth, I’d rather someone else not decide what is true. It should be up to me to decide, and by me, I mean all of us. Leaving it up to us may lead to our demise, but not having the choice may lead to worse.

The people should decide.  

Edited to add:
I think many would agree that bad information has gotten out of hand in recent years. The government cannot and should not take action.  The various sources cannot really be trusted.  What is the real fix? How do we preserve the truth and disarm the lies?

Published in Religion & Philosophy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 31 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. HeavyWater Inactive
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    I Walton (View Comment):

    Costs used to go up with size, especially publications, so there was competition and folks took several newspapers, listened to radio and saw Television. The digital age makes costs go down forever and we have to come to grips with these natural monopolies. Either they publish or provide content, they can’t be allowed to do both. The folks who ran places knew they had to compete and had to compete to put food on the table. Now they’re all billionaires and they are less aware of their ignorance than the previous folks. If they publish they shouldn’t have control of content, users decide on content. Anti monopoly is needed and it might even be possible as the process is not yet under control of the totalitarians taking over the country.

    No.  That’s just busy body government.  We don’t want big government mirco managing our businesses.  

    Each of us can decide what sorts of ideas we want to be involved in disseminating.  I don’t want to be told that I have to have some socialist on my platform and I am not going to insist that YouTube be required to host an anti-vaccincation person on their platform.  

    Let the nut jobs develop their own technology or, if they can’t, they communicate the old fashioned way, by word of mouth.  

    • #31
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.