Dr. Peter McCollough on the International Approach to Covid and Vaccine Development

 

I don’t know how many of you have been watching or reading Dr. Peter McCollough.  He is a practicing clinician and researcher, specializing in the heart and kidney interaction, has some 650 papers to his name, has served on medical Safety Review boards, and is president of at least one professional association.  He speaks from professional expertise to a church on the international approach to covid, the NIH, vaccine development, safety and efficacy, home prevention and treatments, and vaccine hesitancy.  This video is an hour and 20 minutes long, but you should watch at least the first 12 minutes.

He starts with an introduction and an overview of his credentials.  Then he speaks on the importance of medical judgment and randomized trials at 8:34.

Listen for the words “house arrest” at 10:39 (France).

11:43 And doctors threatened with “imprisonment” (Australia).

12:00 Doctor actually “imprisoned”. (S. Africa)

17:13 He briefly describes the Trusted News Initiative.

21:15 Vaccine safety and efficacy starting here.

37:30 86% of vaccine deaths have no other explanation than the vaccine. 1/2 die within 48 hours, and 80% die within one week.

40:30 A quote from the UK’s MHRA Yellow Card system (like the US’s VAERS system) and its determination about all vaccines, [hint] “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans.” [bold mine]

41:40 Legal principle of autonomy, regarding freedom from pressure, coercion, and threat of reprisal.

46:00 Differences in viral load and transmission between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

52:20 Natural immunity versus vaccine immunity.

55:00 Home prevention, treatment, and early therapies:  [hint:]

1:10:00 Rebel doctors.

1:14:45 Mass psychosis

1:15:30 The courts.

1:16:20 Unbreakable

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 67 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Yes, also if patients are put on a vent at two weeks, and put on anti-virals, it’s pointless because the virus is effectively gone by then. They are only treating (or mistreating) the patient by pumping in oxygen which has no hemoglobin to bind to, but at this point the oxygen only increases tissue oxidation; the patient is dying of lung tissue damage not the past infection. So no anti-virals will work.

    You do your medical objections to the objections to chloroquine. I’ll handle the Logic 101 stuff.

    With our powers combined, . . . .

    I’m sorry, what?

    We’re covering different flaws in the anti-chloroquine crowd. And I made a dumb reference to a dumb TV show.

    • #61
  2. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Norm McDonald Had A Farm (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Dr McCullough- proving Brandolini’s law everyday ….along with Mercola (inhale nebulized hydrogen peroxide to treat COVID), Blaylock etc

    Been using nebulized hydrogen peroxide for a year with a Pari Trek nebulizer and food grade H2O2 at 3%, undiluted. Marvelous.

    What specific changes have you noticed in your health and in your body?

    My spouse started using MMS as a regimen and he started taking it to prophylactically prevent COVID.

    But he notices that his arthritis is less worrisome and I notice he has a brighter outlook on life. (Maybe not being bothered by arthritis has elevated his mood.)

    He is now moving into a H2O2 phase – we will see what changes that brings about.

    • #62
  3. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    CRD (View Comment):

    I hope Ricochet’s doctors would weigh in. Especially on two topics: (1) doing nothing vs. early treatment. (2) Evaluation of VAERS deaths. Please. Thank you.

    I think the doctor makes sense about early treatment. What can be the downside to that? In term of deaths reported to VAERS, which side do you think is more likely to be truthful, or right – CDC with zero death attributable to the vaccine? Or this other group with 86%? How do you even judge?

    My view is that on early treatment this physician is absolutely correct.

    On VAERS data, my suspicion is that this data is a tip of the iceberg relative to the actual numbers. All of Dr. McCullogh statements are based on known data, from VAERS, which I think under reports events. There may be less under reporting on the vaccine than on other meds, but given the tendency among physicians to discount any relation between the vaccine and adverse events. I have a sister, age 60, with a rare intracerebral vasculitis, who was doing well, then got the vaccine (I believe Pfizer) who almost immediately developed a severe headache that went on for four days, then her vasculitis worsened dramatically and she became completely paralyzed on her left side, the area correlating with the brain area involved with the vasculitis. She was seeing a university immunologist and a rheumatologist, and any connection between the vaccine and the rapid worsening of her disease was dismissed out of hand.

    SNIP

    Dr. McCullough presents the available data very fairly in my view. And it is frightening. For me the CDC no longer has credibility. Dr. McCullough certainly does. He is basing his statements on personal clinical experience to a great extent, and a lot of data. He is correct that official sources are suppressing information and discussion of these issues, and that is a great error. But then, I am convinced that Fauci knew this virus was from the Wuhan lab gain of function research from the outset. McCullough is completely transparent. I don’t have much direct experience with COVID. I am an endocrinologist, much further removed from the COVID treatment arena. McCullough is directly and heavily involved, SNIP and working his tail off treating patients. Without complete success, but I would hazard a guess that he has saved a lot of patients. I’ve never seen a more thorough and wide ranging discussion of the nature of the disease, and data based discussion of COVID treatment.

    SNIP

    I found this link of 2 pathologists reporting on their examinations of 10 people who died after having a COV vax, as to what damage the vax did, or did not do etc.

    Vasculitis is one of the conditions mentioned as a likely outcome of the vaccine so I thought I’d share the link:

    https://cairnsnews.org/2021/09/29/pathologists-reveal-astonishing-results-of-investigation-into-ten-deaths-linked-to-the-covid-19-vaccines/

     

    • #63
  4. Norm McDonald Had A Farm Inactive
    Norm McDonald Had A Farm
    @Pseudodionysius

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Norm McDonald Had A Farm (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Dr McCullough- proving Brandolini’s law everyday ….along with Mercola (inhale nebulized hydrogen peroxide to treat COVID), Blaylock etc

    Been using nebulized hydrogen peroxide for a year with a Pari Trek nebulizer and food grade H2O2 at 3%, undiluted. Marvelous.

    What specific changes have you noticed in your health and in your body?

    My spouse started using MMS as a regimen and he started taking it to prophylactically prevent COVID.

    But he notices that his arthritis is less worrisome and I notice he has a brighter outlook on life. (Maybe not being bothered by arthritis has elevated his mood.)

    He is now moving into a H2O2 phase – we will see what changes that brings about.

    Dr. Tom Levy and 3 other doctors deserve the credit. Basically, its a poor man’s IV of hydrogen peroxide. IV peroxide was first used during the civil war when – to everyone’s surprise – no hope patients didn’t die and recovered. For reference MMS is chlorine dioxide, Peroxide is really hydrogen dioxide and ozone is oxygen dioxide (3 oxygen molecules instead of 2) — along with hyperbaric oxygen they are all a form of “oxygenating therapies” with different effects.

    The one big surprise to routine peroxide nebulization is the change in your gut flora and hence your immune system because you aren’t swallowing aero-nasal pathogens 24 hours a day. I consider daily or nearly daily peroxide nebulization as not just a defense against oral pathogens but a type of “immune system dental flossing”. If done before and after flights and crowd exposures it can pretty much eliminate airborne viruses from replicating. Tom Levy reports anecdotally that on a family trip to Columbia he was told of 20 cases of even advanced COVID (difficulty breathing) that were eradicated within days using nothing but peroxide nebulization for 90 minutes per day (that’s a lot more than he initially recommended) as a mono therapy with no other nutrient or medicinal support.

    • #64
  5. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Norm McDonald Had A Farm (View Comment):

    Dr. Tom Levy and 3 other doctors deserve the credit. Basically, its a poor man’s IV of hydrogen peroxide. IV peroxide was first used during the civil war when – to everyone’s surprise – no hope patients didn’t die and recovered. For reference MMS is chlorine dioxide, Peroxide is really hydrogen dioxide and ozone is oxygen dioxide (3 oxygen molecules instead of 2) — along with hyperbaric oxygen they are all a form of “oxygenating therapies” with different effects.

    I’m not sure what you’re saying here but hydrogen peroxide is H2O2.

    • #65
  6. Norm McDonald Had A Farm Inactive
    Norm McDonald Had A Farm
    @Pseudodionysius

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Norm McDonald Had A Farm (View Comment):

    Dr. Tom Levy and 3 other doctors deserve the credit. Basically, its a poor man’s IV of hydrogen peroxide. IV peroxide was first used during the civil war when – to everyone’s surprise – no hope patients didn’t die and recovered. For reference MMS is chlorine dioxide, Peroxide is really hydrogen dioxide and ozone is oxygen dioxide (3 oxygen molecules instead of 2) — along with hyperbaric oxygen they are all a form of “oxygenating therapies” with different effects.

    I’m not sure what you’re saying here but hydrogen peroxide is H2O2. 

    Its a mental exercise so that people can remember there’s 3 dioxide combinations: Hydrogen, Chlorine, Oxygen (via Ozone) . Its simply a useful shorthand for people trying to remember and classifying oxygenating therapies.

    • #66
  7. Nanocelt TheContrarian Member
    Nanocelt TheContrarian
    @NanoceltTheContrarian

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    On VAERS data, my suspicion is that this data is a tip of the iceberg relative to the actual numbers. All of Dr. McCullogh statements are based on known data, from VAERS, which I think under reports events. There may be less under reporting on the vaccine than on other meds, but given the tendency among physicians to discount any relation between the vaccine and adverse events. I have a sister, age 60, with a rare intracerebral vasculitis, who was doing well, then got the vaccine (I believe Pfizer) who almost immediately developed a severe headache that went on for four days, then her vasculitis worsened dramatically and she became completely paralyzed on her left side, the area correlating with the brain area involved with the vasculitis. She was seeing a university immunologist and a rheumatologist, and any connection between the vaccine and the rapid worsening of her disease was dismissed out of hand.

    It seems to me that a lot depends on the degree of underreporting. Is there any way of knowing how much underreporting there might be?

    Not that I am aware of. As things stand, there seems to be a lot of political pressure not to report adverse events potentially related to the vaccines.  It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that my sister’s course was unrelated to the vaccine, but both her immunologist and her rheumatologist, both among the top in their respective fields, denied any connection to the vaccine.

    • #67
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.