Did the Media and Big Tech Conspire to Assure Biden’s Election?

 

We have more and more lately come to the conclusion that Glenn Greenwald is in the top echelon of honest, fair, hard-working journalists and we pay close attention to his frequent guest appearances on the Tucker Carlson show (just about our last bastion for real, deeply researched news in a “vast wasteland” of garbage). Some time ago I subscribed to his blog, greenwald.substack.com, which I can recommend without reservation for an in-depth treatment of the political issues of the day.

Through his blog, and his Twitter feed, I learned of the video he put out recently with a full analysis of the Biden [Crime] Family emails and the minutely detailed examination of the way the CIA, Corporate Media, and Big Tech conspired to censor the hugely important New York Post story on the Hunter Biden laptop about ten days before the 2020 (stolen) Presidential Election. It is entitled New Proof Emerges About the Hunter Biden Laptop: a Definitive Account of the CIA/Media Fraud. He incorporates into his analysis some of the deep reporting apparently done by the author of a new book just out, The Bidens: Inside the First Family’s Fifty-Year Rise to Power, by James Shreckinger.

The entire video, which is a little over an hour long, is one of the most complete, persuasive, and professionally produced compilation of the real evidence against the Biden Crime Family I have ever seen. I simply cannot recommend it too highly for anyone who really wants to have a more thorough understanding of the depth of the real corruption and deliberate deceit of the media— and the Bidens! However, if this boiling, bubbling vat of filth and degradation are not enough for you, as an extra dollop of Bidenesque sleaze, I commend to your attention the article “If These Latest Revelations Aren’t Enough to Arrest Hunter Biden, then Nothing Is” which can be accessed here.

Every time you think these cretins cannot possibly sink any lower, they prove you wrong — every single time! Trigger warning: this is not beach reading and the following video is not easy-going “infotainment”!

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 38 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    Big tech thinks they can run matters  because they run their companies well.  The fact is, and all history demonstrates it, running companies or states, in the long run,  requires competition, life and death and emergence of new companies and new technology.  Neither happens top down.  China, who  already is calling more shots than we realize, will end up with greater competition and ground up technology than the US and they will run matters. until they disintegrate as they always do,  If we can’t have honest elections prior to the next election it’s over unless we can separate free states from pieces of California, New York and their few satellites.

    • #31
  2. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    I have been saying for many years that I did not trust the DC DOJ’s ethics (our local US Attorney’s staff, while technically DOJ, is locally controlled and I have no criticism of my experiences with them).  The FBI is part of the DOJ.  The FBI has been dirty for a long time, not just the DC staff.  Oh, not everyone is dirty and not in every case, but there is plenty of dirt throughout the country.  For a fascinating example, check out Campside Media’s podcast “Chameleon: High Rollers” season 2.

    For years, the FBI, unlike more honest local law enforcement, has refused to record interviews, relying instead on “SR-22’s”.  The SR-22 is a form on which agents record their recollections of interviews.  The non-use of recorded interviews has been official written FBI policy for nearly 15 years.  The DOJ would prosecute allegations of lying to the FBI based upon these SR-22 recollections.  We learned during the General Flynn prosecution that non-participants in the actual interviews were permitted to “edit” SR-22’s.”  To use merely the recorded recollection has a basis for prosecution is bad enough, but to base a prosecution on one edited by a non-participant?  Truly and astoundingly, awful.

    The publicly available information on the Biden crime family is the acid test.  We know the DOJ has had Hunter’s laptop for over a year.  If there are no Biden prosecutions very soon, the DOJ/FBI corruption should be obvious to all, as if the Russiagate and other actions weren’t enough. 

     

    • #32
  3. Nohaaj Coolidge
    Nohaaj
    @Nohaaj

    David Carroll (View Comment):
    If there are no Biden prosecutions very soon,

    I will lay a fifty, that there will be no Biden prosecution during the tenancy of Joe’s pResidency.  I will go double or nothing that there will never be a Biden prosecution. 

    • #33
  4. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    Nohaaj (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):
    If there are no Biden prosecutions very soon,

    I will lay a fifty, that there will be no Biden prosecution during the tenancy of Joe’s presidency. I will go double or nothing that there will never be a Biden prosecution.

    I’m not taking that bet.  I believe in the corruption.  The only possibility is that the Dem powers might want an excuse other that mental degeneration to remove Biden, so we can have the first woman/black president.

    • #34
  5. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    Glenn Greenwald raises many interesting issues.

    For example, is it OK for a foreign power to “interfere” in our elections by releasing truthful negative information about a candidate?  I think it is OK.  

    • #35
  6. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    Glenn Greenwald raises many interesting issues.

    For example, is it OK for a foreign power to “interfere” in our elections by releasing truthful negative information about a candidate? I think it is OK.

    At this point I welcome foreign “interference” if that means exposing corruption. The only problem is when both sides are corrupt (as is the case) they can focus on one and not the other. Still, the US media is certainly doing this 24/7 on behalf of one party, so I’d rather hear everything and (try to) judge for myself.

    • #36
  7. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    I have been saying for many years that I did not trust the DC DOJ’s ethics (our local US Attorney’s staff, while technically DOJ, is locally controlled and I have no criticism of my experiences with them). The FBI is part of the DOJ. The FBI has been dirty for a long time, not just the DC staff. Oh, not everyone is dirty and not in every case, but there is plenty of dirt throughout the country. For a fascinating example, check out Campside Media’s podcast “Chameleon: High Rollers” season 2.

    For years, the FBI, unlike more honest local law enforcement, has refused to record interviews, relying instead on “SR-22’s”. The SR-22 is a form on which agents record their recollections of interviews. The non-use of recorded interviews has been official written FBI policy for nearly 15 years. The DOJ would prosecute allegations of lying to the FBI based upon these SR-22 recollections. We learned during the General Flynn prosecution that non-participants in the actual interviews were permitted to “edit” SR-22’s.” To use merely the recorded recollection has a basis for prosecution is bad enough, but to base a prosecution on one edited by a non-participant? Truly and astoundingly, awful.

    The publicly available information on the Biden crime family is the acid test. We know the DOJ has had Hunter’s laptop for over a year. If there are no Biden prosecutions very soon, the DOJ/FBI corruption should be obvious to all, as if the Russiagate and other actions weren’t enough.

    I see on twitter that Biden’s laptop never did exist.  The whole story’s fake.  And I read that the Press is losing so much revenue that it is now proposed to be funded by the US government, so that insures that we will always know what’s going on in our country.

    • #37
  8. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    It wasn’t just 2020  – most of Hunter’s “business deals” occurred during the Obama Admin. Corporate media had to keep up the narrative that the only controversy during Obama’s reign was a tan suit.

    • #38
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.