Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
President Bush’s Mistaken 9/11 Speech
Bush Granted Moral Equivalence of 9/11 Perpetrators With the Wrong “Domestic Terrorists.” It Should Go To “May 19” and Their Successors, Not January 6th.
Many of us, I suspect, are relieved that the 20th Anniversary of September 11, 2001, is over. Most have moved on, back to work, to the continuing crisis in Afghanistan, an election in California, and other issues at home. It was not fun to relive the horror of that day, the loss of life, and the anger it rekindled. But it was necessary.
For the most part, the remembrances and events of the day were well suited to the occasion. Many of us chose to highlight some of the “silver linings,” from acts of heroism to the kindness of strangers in places like Gander, Newfoundland.
Sadly, the remembrances did not rekindle the national unity we experienced after that terrorist attack.
I will admit to not previously being that down on this Bush, mostly because of the manner in which he was demonized by the left while in office, and because he kept Al Gore and John Kerry from the Presidency.
However, he’s now dead to me for reasons that are not CoC compatible.
And to the families of the 3,000 killed on 9/11, you think you have it bad? Well someone put their feet a Speaker Pelosi’s desk without first wiping them on the welcome mat, so we all have our crosses to bear.
His statement is mysterious and vague.
I believe it’s defensive. His administration implemented the Patriot Act, and it seems he’s quite proud of it. That the justification for the “extremists at home”.
There are all kinds of “extremists”.
I wouldn’t be too afraid if benign representatives were in control of the NSA and other Intel/Enforcement agencies. But that’s not the case. And it would be naive to believe that such power would remain in control of the ‘forces of good’ for very long. And they haven’t, if they ever were.
So either W is too stupid to see that ( I was a defender of his intelligence back in the day) or he doesn’t much care.
Our Federal law enforcement and Intel agencies are not here to prevent every random bombing.
I don’t normally give much credence to wink-wink-nudge-nudge dog-whistles and parsed vagaries, but Bush clearly twice separated into two groups home-grown domestic terrorists and overseas terrorists; and though drawing the distinction, clearly linked and characterized their motives and methods as the same. He didn’t speak up about anti-fa or BLM at the time so I doubt that he was referring to them. This is pretty apparent to me that he was referring to what the entire U.S. government has singled out as “the number-one threat to the United States”: labelling “white supremacists” as domestic terrorists.
Sometimes it seems like they FIRST identify certain people who get involved with violent acts as “domestic terrorists,” and THEN – to differentiate them from BLM etc who they believe must be tolerated and even celebrated – they label them as “white supremacists” which is actually the WORST thing, of course. To them.
“they are children of the same foul spirit…”
Who wrote this for him?
Peggy Noonan? Some other WSJ contributor with an English degree?
Or is he now a special preacher who can determine the spiritual odors of non-defined ‘extremists’?
This will not go away.
Bush43 is the worst president in US history. He is a bad guy and similar to Hunter Biden, except his addiction was to booze instead of crack. Bush43 failed up all the way to White House. One of the reasons he is the worst, is that he broke the country after 9/11 by saying anyone against his wars of choice was “unpatriotic”. I think his “you are either with us or with the terrorists” rhetoric put us on the path to having half our citizens being indifferent/uncaring/hateful of our country. It created a divide that Obama utilized to drive us further apart. If you follow the Colorado River upstream from the Grand Canyon, it is just small divide. Bush43 is the wellspring for all the division we now have in country.
Or maybe it was the terrorist attack itself that began separating those who really love and appreciate America from those who think it COULD BE great “if only…”
Absinth.
But a flourish of flowery poetically-evocative words hides a lot of meaning, or no meaning at all. It this case, I think it was a lot of foul meaning in disguise.
And yes, Bush 43 “knew how to speak to evangelical groups” and this is what he’s doing here.
I liked (or supported) Bush more when the Left hated him. Looking back he was the same mad globalist tool that his father was. I can’t say he was the worst President, maybe his father was.
What would you expect from someone who says that a warrior religion like Islam is a religion of peace?
Nope. We had great national Unity. Bush43 had a 91% approval rating. Everyone like firefighters and flags. Then Bush43 started calling dissenters of his crappy policy as unpatriotic.
Bush41 at least was a war hero. As a president, he was partly bound by Reagan’s policies. Of course, Bush41 was a coastal elitist and globalist and a tool of the Intellectual Community. He was a poor leader and failed to make political hay out of the fall of the Soviet Union. Bone head. However, it was Bush43 that nationalized public schools with NCLB and greatly expanded Medicaid without adding in market reforms or sustainability.
I neither disagree nor agree really. I look at it differently. I look at it as a dynastic progression, in which each person is not an individual but an extension of the parent. In other words, Bush 43 was nothing more than his father’s father’s son carrying on the family business goals of continuing the formation of the NWO (which is now apparently called the Great Reset) by specifically laying waste to the Middle East in Iraq and Afghanistan. Then it was 0bama’s turn to destroy Syria and Libya. And it was supposed to be continued by Hillary. That’s why Jeb’s campaign was so late and lethargic: he had no real reason to run because he wasn’t supposed to win.
It really does look like a Uniparty to me. McCain, Romney and Jeb were never supposed to win. It was supposed to be 0bama, 0bama, Hillary and Hillary. But Trump messed things up. And so then we got hmmmm — Joe Biden, 0bama’s VP and 0bama’s administrative staff — who put the finishing touches on Afghanistan. What more is Biden going to do? Lose Taiwan and South Korea? Maybe I don’ really believe it, but it seems more plausible very time I think about it.
Of course this implies an overarching leadership, a group of puppet masters, a cabal or something. That’s why it seems so crazy.
I don’t think W. Bush is the worst, I reserve the low spots on my list for those who were innovative and unprecedented in their disregard of their oath of office. Bush had no imagination, everything in his playbook was taken from his predecessors. Actually, it’s amazing how similar he is to Woodrow Wilson. Their attitude towards global progressivism is identical.
And then there was Neill who was busy signing contracts for the family while his brother and nephew were in power. The Bushes, the Bidens? What’s the difference?
If Jeb had won the Florida governorship on his first run in 1994, then there would be no need for “plan B” (George) to be pushed into the presidency. Yes, if Jeb had won in 1994, we’d have never been subjected to George W as president.
Are you saying that we would have had President Jeb winning in 2000, or President Algore? Not sure either of those would have been better.
I realize that many consider Kurt Schlichter a bomb thrower but I agree with his premise in today’s Townhall column.
I’d encourage any Texas Ricochetti to vote against George P. Bush for whichever office he’s looking to advance in to there (or any of their progeny). It’s past time to bring (vote) that political dynasty to an end.
What about Hunter Biden vs Chelsea Clinton in the Democrat primaries?
Bush’s speech itself could have referred to Antifa and BLM. There was nothing in it that applied only to violent Trump supporters. Antifa and BLM …Defiling national symbols, check. Disregard for pluralism, check. Disregard for human life…Antifa and BLM killed people last year. I’ve never heard of any MAGA yahoo who’s killed anyone. I agree it’s likely he was referring to 1/6 but if so I think he outsmarted himself in his choice of words.
Them too. I don’t believe they announced running for anything. Yet.
Well, they do say that six people were killed or died as a result of the 1/6 event. With the police suicides it’s probably up to 8.
They say that..but the only person killed by another was Ashli Babbit.