Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
IRS Wants Your Bank Statements
How do you fund a $3.5 trillion budget? The honest answer is, you don’t. Joe Biden knows this, but he thinks he can find some additional revenue by snooping through your bank statements.
As part of Biden’s The American Families Plan (A plan for families? How nice) there would be a requirement for banks to provide more information about your account to the IRS:
The President’s proposal leverages the information that financial institutions already know about the accounts that they house. Financial institutions would add information about total account outflows and inflows to existing reporting on bank accounts. Importantly, there are no added requirements for taxpayers. The IRS will be able to deploy this new information to better target enforcement activities, increasing scrutiny of wealthy evaders and decreasing the likelihood that fully compliant taxpayers will be subject to costly audits.
Sure, this might be what our Founding Fathers would have called an unreasonable search but it will happen with “no added requirements” to you, the taxpayer. What they would be asking from the banks is information about any transaction, incoming or outgoing, of $600 or more. As we have been told over and over again, the rich do not pay their fair share (whatever that means). Now we know that anyone who is dealing with sums in the $600 range is obviously some rich fat cat looking to ripoff the IRS.
There are more than a few issues here. The first is, what right does the government have to gather all of that information without a warrant? And what else might that data get used for? So, constitutionality could be a potential issue. Then there is pure logistics: This is a huge reporting burden on banks and, no doubt, smaller ones couldn’t afford to do it.
While this is touted as a way to get better voluntary compliance, the data would also be used for audits. The Left loves to play up class warfare, but they also know that truly rich individuals can afford better accountants and lawyers than the government can. Going after them involves cost and potential risk. However, with a $600 threshold, plenty of not-so-rich people could get called in for audits. Without the means to fight, many smaller taxpayers will pay what they’re told regardless of the merit because they can’t afford to put up a defense and don’t want to risk any further penalties. In other words, the IRS will pressure them into surrendering . . . but it is all about American Families.
Published in General
The government wants to be have full visibility of everyone, all the time, so they can then control us.
I need to buy some more Mason jars and a new shovel.
That’s the whole thing isn’t it? Power. It’ll start with just the numbers and soon after what those numbers were used for (where, when what). They’ve been toying with the idea for a while in the “cashless” society thing. Nothing hidden, everything spread out for the government to see…and tax.
I don’t trust them at all with any initiative.
Ive been audited and it was an enriching experience for me because I learned all the legal tax deductions I wasn’t making.
The individuals working for the IRS I’ve encountered are fine people. I liked our auditor.
We were ultimately charged 3,000 extra over some technicality but it was clearly ( to me) a face-saving move. And after that I’ve never been audited again in 12 years.
This is a shortcut. They can have the information in real time, without a formal demand.
So, when they say ‘costly unnecessary’ audits, maybe that’s because they are incompetent to detect fraud and are catching too many fish (like me) to throw back.
That’s step one.
Next will be digitization of the currency. Just think of the savings from not having to print currency and mint coins! And “there won’t be any added requirements to the taxpayer.”
It’s Brave New World, 1984, Idiocracy, Alice in Wonderland and Roshoman all at once!
I’m just trying to stay(?) sane.
This is beginning to sound like a Mack Reynolds novel written in the 1950s set in the 2020s.
Unreasonable Search and Seizure, sue immediately if enacted. Class-action lawsuit, made up of a class including each American citizen with a bank account.
The Biden / Harris / Whomever administration sure isn’t doing anything to disprove the “conspiracy theorists ” claiming we are facing a totalitarian dictatorship.
Yup, they may as well put up the telescreen and be done with it. Facebook is just the first step.
Time to get out of the banking system. The federal government never had the authority to create corporations anyway. Thanks a lot, Washington and Hamilton.
and that includes “Venmo, PayPal, crypto exchanges” as well. Can’t imagine this gets past Congress but . . .
We are going to end up owned by the government, like slaves.
You don’t trust the people that have had trespassers locked up for 8 months, because the Dems don’t like their politics?
I will say that Congress *loves* to raise marginal rates, since it makes tax deductions and loopholes more valuable to sell.
As best I recall, the rationale for the first regulations of this kind were that they were necessary to catch drug lords and other organized crime figures.
It seems inevitable that sooner or later the justification will be to catch people who fail to report on their tax returns that they earned $10 selling an old dresser in a garage sale…or merely that they cannot prove where some cash deposit came from.
Meanwhile, the IRS will continue to have zero interest in the “mystery” of how congressmen and senators can become multi-multi-multi-millionaires on their relatively modest salaries.
Now that is an investigation I would like to see
I would like to have full visibility of the FBI interactions with the Obama administration regarding their spying and harassment of the Trump administration.
I would like to have full visibility of the politically-motivated leaks of information from the IRS.
I would like to have a Roe vs Wade decision to deal with an actual issue of privacy.
I would like to have full visibility of the relationship between government and GoogleFace.
“A poor politician is a poor politician”
An excellent illustration of the adage that politics attracts the worst people.
Hopefully Congress will not pass this, but if it does, I wouldn’t be shocked if this turns out to be one of those deals where the government spends more money trying to catch tax cheats than they actually recover from them. Like Minnesota’s estate tax which likely costs the state more than it brings in.
It’s not very much about the money. If it was about the money, there are a lot of things they would do differently. (See Laffer’s Curve for more information.)
It’ll sail through with no trouble at all.
Good grief. Who doesn’t make such transfers in and out of accounts rather regularly.
Every time I see that Silver Star in his lapel I go crazy…
This is the broke government that withholds $0.01 from my credit union account when I earn $0.03 in interest.
If it were a $3.5T budget we could fund it, heck with $3.8T in revenue we could even have a surplus to pay down the debt.
The problem is that the US spending right now is running at just over $7T right now. Heck our budget is at $6.9T right now…and the Dems want to add another $1.5T (Infrastructure), $3.5T (General Pork), and likely even more for the Green New Deal. That jacks up the budget from $6.9T to $7.4T…seems like a drop in the budget so why not spend it?
Those numbers are all from U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time (usdebtclock.org)
Yes, this for an extra $3.5 triilion
Years ago Bill Buckley came up with a questionnaire of 3 questions.
1 Networth upon entering political office
2 Salary in political office
3 Current net worth.
I guess you could add a fourth ‘Splain , Lucy’
I think when you buy silver and gold now, they have to report it to the government.
Anybody that stocked up on silver rounds etc. a few years ago could be way ahead.
There is no value added by central planning with the tax code. There is no value added by the IRS. Total drag on everything.