Conservative Conversation + Podcasts

Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.

Quote of the Day: When Can Christians Disobey the Government?

 

Awhile back I posted my own intro to “An unjust law is no law at all” from Aquinas and Augustine. In the relevant passage of the Summa Theologiae, Aquinas gives some guidelines on resisting unjust governmental decrees. There’s probably a lot more somewhere else in Aquinas, but do I look like I have that kind of time?

Fortunately, a blog called Protestant Post had the time to put together a solid analysis of the question “When Can Christians Disobey the Government?”  The methodology of reasoning inductively from the Bible looks good to me, and I didn’t notice anything in the conclusions that seemed off.  (Well, maybe one thing, but it seems relatively minor.)

Not that I have the time to be thorough–unless y’all make me in comments.

Here are some interesting passages from the Protestant Post post. Lemme know what you think of them!

Section 2: First Principles of Resistance:

. . .

2.8. Christians engaging in lawful disobedience must still sincerely seek the good of the magistrate they are opposing and the commonwealth of which they are members; God blesses this kind of lawful disobedience.

Section 3: Unjust Commands:

3. Christians can and must disobey the magistrate when required to do something sinful or prevented from fulfilling their positive duties towards God.

3.1. In refusing to comply with evil commands, Christians have a positive duty to aid their brethren in this resistance spiritually, physically, and financially.

3.2. If there is disagreement among Christians about what is or is not sinful – and thus when the magistrate may be disobeyed – the duty to aid the brethren is not abrogated.

3.3. If one believes another Christian’s disobedience was unwise, he is still obligated to help him; however, if the disobedience was of an obvious, blatant, and pagan-like nature, aid may be withheld until such time as he repents.

3.4. The manner of disobedience must be in a form proportionate to the sin being required (or the sin of omission which would be incurred if the Christian obeyed the magistrate).

. . .

Section 6: Preparing for Lawful Disobedience:

6. Christians are to understand the times in which they live and the culture they inhabit.

6.1. Since at many times throughout their history, God’s people have been persecuted and attacked, Christians, of all people, ought to be the most vigilant in anticipating tyranny and the corresponding possibility of resistance.

6.2. Thus, Christians have a duty to prepare for lawful disobedience. This includes several key responsibilities:

6.2.1. Ensuring congregants understand God’s law and have a strong grasp on Protestant Resistance Theory,

6.2.2. Ensuring congregants are spiritually prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice if – God forbid – things should come to that,

6.2.3. Ensuring churches have practical plans for the physical and financial effects of persecution and lawful disobedience,

6.2.4. And finally, ensuring that churches are mortifying and repenting of the sins for which they and their nation are being or will be judged.

Further Reading:

. . .

We must always remember that the most effective form of resistance is repentance and regeneration.

Published in Religion & Philosophy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 61 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    You mean someone who says the steps stop at the sinner’s prayer might be neither heretical nor confused? What else would they be? They certainly wouldn’t be right, according to you in # 55.

    You can’t just let me take my victory and walk away? Hrumph.

    What victory?

    Why not answer my question–what third option is there?

    Seriously, when Stina mentioned steps in #33, I thought she was speaking against their necessity in salvation. And you seem to have argued them as necessary. If I’ve got this wrong, then don’t read any further.

    Of course steps are necessary: Faith is necessary, and faith involves steps, or acts of faith.

    Of course works are not necessary for salvation in that salvation is by faith rather than works–meaning that works do not earn G-d’s favor.

    When I wrote in #51

    Remember Abraham was saved when he simply believed God. There was certainly intellectual context, but there was nothing more than accepting that what God said was true.

    I was giving short attention to the idea that nothing that happens in a man’s life happens without some kind of context. Even having come to know the same language as someone who is telling you the Gospel. He may have heard of Yahweh, perhaps his family worshipped Yahweh. Perhaps he actually did worship Him by sacrificing lambs and such. Who knows. But any version of this is all context for when Abraham heard God’s voice. It’s context, not works. And I doubt that knowing anything about God, perhaps other than his name, is even prerequisite for belief and salvation. Just as I quoted: He who began a good work among you will complete it. And as I referred to “For it is God which works in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.” And furthermore, “So then neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth.” God assures the growth.

    In contrast, if we had to believe something in particular to be saved, we’d have dozen catechisms and scores of denominations today, and thousands of interpretations of every Bible verse, and at the doctrinal judgment day only one person would be right and get every answer right in the great test of doctrinal purity in heaven. And that person would be the Questioner.

    Ok. Reading this, if somewhat quickly, it seems ok to me.

    Thanks.

    Based on this and # 55, I think we probably agree on everything, but that some formulations look deceptively like disagreement to you, and even like fallacies.

    • #61
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.

@