Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
While You Were Watching Afghanistan, This Aired on 60 Minutes
Amazon testing a driverless truck.
We all see the big transporters on the highways delivering the very lifeblood of our nation’s products — food, building supplies, car parts — everything that we use to function as a nation. Unbeknownst to the truckers, driverless trucks, guided by AI — sophisticated computer systems that include WI-FI and GPS — are guiding these big rigs down American highways at high rates of speed (of course, observing the speed limit), while also recording the license plates around them, and everything else.
When asked by the interviewer, where does this information go, they evaded answering the question and other serious questions. In addition, the truckers don’t understand why they have not been made aware of this new technology, which could possibly eliminate at least 2 million jobs. Why do I sense China is in this new industry? Because I watched a documentary where driverless cars, and elimination of jobs was on the horizon as a consequence, and the Chinese presenter laughed and said, “Driverless vehicles coming soon – within the next ten years.” Why? Because they are very involved in this “green new deal” that we are being sold as a method to “save the planet.” Many jobs, not just truckers, will be erased thanks to robotics and AI, of which they are at the forefront. Do you think they have an interest in Afghanistan and its resources? Keep that thought.
Someone recently posted a video of Elon Musk saying AI is more of a threat than nuclear weapons. Why did he say that?
I think this is hook, line, and sinker part of the Great Reset.
These are unelected people who are transforming our world under our noses while we are being distracted. There are many names that you would be familiar with on these boards. Corporations and individuals, and countries who do not necessarily endorse the work ethic, family values, or the engines that have driven the West, America, and freedom to accomplish all that it has. See what you think – I am interested in your thoughts. I feel this will continue unless we grasp the scope of the global New World Order and its intended agenda.
Published in General
I don’t doubt that, but my point is that deflation doesn’t fix everything. You still get automation, and increasingly complex jobs, but that doesn’t make people smarter. You’re going to be left with increasing numbers of people without anything they are CAPABLE OF doing as a job, let alone anything they might be NEEDED FOR. And deflation of NO INCOME doesn’t improve their situation.
They can force all of this. I shell out for a guy that says that real interest rates are going to go -12%. People aren’t going to have a choice and they are going to take the check.
They can create NGDP so people have jobs as well. 4% inflation and 4% GDP will work just fine.
The same Chinese presenter that spoke at this symposium with the snicker said “you won’t have to worry about that smelly driver” (Uber & taxis), you just call up a driverless car to take you where you want. No one will own cars. Think about it. Something that sits in the driveway way more than it ever gets used” Cars will become a useless purchase”. This is playing into the fuel shut downs (pipelines – more job losses), saving on pollution (ok -I get that), but I see someone else controlling where I go and when. My info will all be on some database – my “profile” – am I vaccinated or not, is my social credit a C- because I donated to a conservative candidate?
Or they control what the rigs carry – uh-oh – this cargo is full of meat – bad. What about hazardous cargo? That requires a specialized driver.
Agree – but they also seem to be airing certain content that is like a conditioning of what is on the horizon. I like the fact that the interviewer was questioning those in charge where all the data was going that the cameras on the front of the truck was recording. He said he was ‘not at liberty to say’. What a weird answer.
That’s an interesting picture. I think about all those sci-fi movies – the humans are always the sub-species………..
This is the documentary that I watched where the Chinese guy talks about driverless cars – and the useless class etc:
https://muse.ai/v/CRFPmJ1-The-New-Normal-Documentary-by-happennetwork
They go into AI and the elimination of the workforce – it’s very interesting.
But not riding along with them (to supervise), or maintaining them.
This ignores how people actually use their cars. For example – infants and car seats – we leave these in our car while it sits in the driveway to have the use of it when when we need to take our kid somewhere. Doesn’t happen if you don’t own cars.
Car seats would be a simple design modification. I suppose, every seat in a digital car could transform into a car seat, or a booster seat.
Who was the pundit who infamously told unemployed factory workers to “learn to code”?
The changes do seem to be coming faster in recent years, and the faster they happen and the more people they affect the harder it is to adjust.
Indeed. And what happens to those people? Without useful work to do they will become, well, we already have slums in England and America telling us what happens to people who somehow become surplus to requirements.
But in fact it’s not just the bottom end of the bell curve that is threatened–more like the entire bottom half.
Don’t forget emergencies. If everyone suddenly needs a car (hurricane or other disaster?) then the fleet of shared driverless cars will be vastly insufficient for the sudden demand.
Wouldn’t such a person need to be a qualified driver themself? In that case, where do the great savings come from?
For sure, it was someone who doesn’t understand/appreciate what coding means – at least GOOD coding – and very likely couldn’t do it themselves.
And they likely would be unable to function in emergency situations, too.
The great savings come from a couple of sources – the amount of time a driver is allowed to be on the road could increase – the reduction in crashes.
Remember, drivers do more than drive. They log their deliveries, drop the cargo (or pump the cargo out), notify dispatch of problems with the rig. Heck any number of drivers I have talked to speak very poorly of the drop off instructions they receive, so the self driving truck gets you within a mile or two, but you still have the last mile problem.
Unless you’re saying the driver can be sacked out in back until the “last mile” they would still have to be at the wheel and alert for things that might happen. I don’t think you could add much to current hour limits in that situation, and indeed with less to do requiring constant attention, they’re more likely to watch movies or read or text or something.
Depends – the rules for team drivers are more lax and a self driving truck could be treated as team.
I have a high school friend who drives and his number one complaint is with the scheduling shop and the fact that they send him on runs where he times out 15 minutes from home. So he parks the truck, sleeps in the cab his required 6 hours then heads to the yard.
Imagine if you had a time machine and could talk to a field hand in 1840. What would he think if you told him that tractors would one day make his job obsolete? But don’t worry, you say, because there will be other jobs for simpletons like you. Like driving trucks! And you show him a model year 2000 or new semi truck and trailer. The guy would think you must be an escapee from a sanitarium. Surely this must be the most complicated machine ever invented! How could a common lummox ever learn how to operate something that complex? And yet, it seems that the common man with a high school education can operate these machines and smart phones and all kinds of devices that would have blown Thomas Edison’s mind.
I’m sure people have been having these conversations since the wheel was invented and will still be having them three hundred years from now.
Yes, but with a TEAM there is always one human DRIVER at the wheel. Treating a single driver and a self-driving truck as a “team” would mean the one human DRIVER would/could be asleep much of the time, as with a two-human team where one of the humans can be sleeping or otherwise occupied while the other HUMAN is at the wheel. But when a single HUMAN driver is sleeping, only the truck is “at the wheel” and that’s the situation that needs to be avoided for the reasons listed previously.
There’s a lot more to operating a freight truck than driving a car – which is why you need a special license, for example – and many average people can use a smart phone for making calls etc while having no clue about and never using the myriad other features available. Plus “Average” is not the low end of the curve.
Yeah, it would seem to be most practical to have self-driving trucks just running back and forth between the same few distribution points, where they just switch trailers then go back again. Just like trains haul cargo long distances, but then a truck driver takes it to the actual final destination.
Who does the trailer switching? I would argue a human.
Disagree – provided those other problem are worked out. AND to get to the horrifying humanless future people seem to be worried about they would have to be.
Autopilots did not eliminate Pilot jobs – they did make aviation safer. Self-driving trucks – same thing.
Sure. Truck comes in, idles in a parking spot for a human to get there and make decisions. The human unhitches that load, hitches up another long haul load and sends the automated truck back to Tampa, or wherever. Then the human can get in a standard rig and haul the load from the distribution center to whatever local destination it has. It’s not a completely automated system but it employs a fifth of the drivers than it would if it needed bodies for the long hauls.
That’s another point missing from the discussion. When you do automate a system it isn’t all at once, sign on the dotted line and a million truckers get fired. It takes time to ramp up new systems, and skilled labor to complete the rest of the job.
To be fair, folks are taking 60 minutes at their word that 1M truck drivers are going to lose their jobs. 60 Minutes.
Believing 60 minutes on nearly anything is succumbing to Gell-Mann Amnesia. Don’t be a Gell-Mann amnesiac.
A number of companies only have their single hub. So there isn’t a drop off place that they own to make the switch. Since they get paid when their driver delivers the load and the receiver accepts the load, there is still human interaction going on. Maybe the billions of out of work “truck drivers” can get into the newly invented “truck agent” business, where they perform the human activity at the end of a run, representing either the shipper or receiver.