Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
What Do You Mean We Have To Sink The Bismarck Again?
My Mom and Dad met when they were reporters for the El Paso Times. After they married, my father became a correspondent* for the Associated Press in New Mexico. My mother worked as a police reporter, stringer, and photographer until my father became AP bureau chief.
She still reads two physical newspapers every day. During a visit last week, she handed me this clipping, asking “How did that happen?”
I glanced at the clipping and started to tell her what I knew about the history of the Bismarck, the battle of Denmark Strait, and the final sinking of the German ship. She stopped me and said, “No, I wanted to know how it sank another ship three days after it had been sunk itself.” I looked more closely at the clipping and saw the mistake. “Oh,” I said, “they should have written ‘earlier’ instead of ‘later.'”
Even though she had not been a newspaperman since the 1970’s, she was still able to spot this one mistake. I guess you never lose your skills.**
Surprisingly, even though she had lived through those times, she had no knowledge of the events described in the clipping. I won’t fault her for that. When the Bismarck was sunk, she was a young girl in a small town in rural Texas. She didn’t turn twelve until December 7th of that year.
* My father hated the word ‘journalist,’ corrected anyone who called him that, and refused to hire anyone with a journalism degree. His degree was in history.***
** Please don’t ask me to arrest someone or start a line when I’m 91.
*** I’ll bet he knew about the sinking of the Bismarck.
Published in Humor
She reads in chunks, and trusts the next layer just below her attention to alert her.
Far too many commas as well.
For many years I have been in favor of instituting that as a reform across the board, retroactively. Now I have been vindicated.
I’d say it has the right number of commas, but a crucial one is in the wrong place. To be grammatical, it should be:
It’s still badly written and factually incorrect, but at least now there’s no comma splice. And now that it’s grammatical, the inherent anachronism becomes even harder to miss.
I’ve seen so many grammatical mistakes and spelling errors in AP articles these days, nothing would surprise me . . .
My father was named after the ship that helped disable the Bismarck.
Stop reading AP articles, problem solved.