Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
After a week off, we’re back and putting our best foot forward with guests Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) and our good friend and podcaster Professor Richard Epstein. The Senator talks to us about Iran, Guantanamo, and his controversial “endorsement” of Bernie Sanders. Speaking of Sanders, our hosts explain why they admire him and wish Republicans would emulate him. Yes, you read that right. Later, Richard Epstein stops by to explain why Ted Cruz can run for President despite being born in Canada and the surprising chances the gives that a certain Democratic Presidential candidate gets indicted. Finally, a long time ago in a far away place (Switzerland), Peter Robinson had dinner with David Bowie. Yes, you read that right too.
Music from this week’s episode:
Take It Easy by The Eagles
The opening sequence for the Ricochet Podcast was composed and produced by James Lileks.
Ziggy played guitar, EJHill.
Yes, you should absolutely subscribe to this podcast. It helps!
Help Ricochet by Supporting Our Sponsors
This podcast is brought to you by Harry’s Shave. For the finest shave at the best price, got Harrys.com and use the coupon code RICOCHET at checkout.
Get control of your inbox. Try SaneBox yourself with two free weeks of SaneBox. Visit sanebox.com/ricochet to start your trial—no credit card needed.
For a limited time The Great Courses has a Special offer for Ricochet listeners. Order any of these 4 Business & Presentation courses – for just $9.95. Go to thegreatcourses.com/RICOCHET
Subscribe to The Ricochet Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.
Bowie and Robinson – A duet for the ages….
Fixed!
Is that the diner on old Route 23 which is ten minutes away from wherever it is I happen to live?
Because if it is, I’ll be right over.
Is that Richard or Tom playing Ziggy?
Beat me to it! Good eye John.
Nice choice of Bowie song Yeti; a definite favorite!
Lileks missed the follow on question…He asked what the odds of an indictment are. The better question is “what are the odds of a recommendation to indict by the FBI?”
Hoping that we know that mandating saying Merry Christmas is another expected shot at Trump supporters.
The ethanol question is not under presidential control either. Maybe our congress will get back in the game.
I like Sarah Palin.
I love the opening!
It’s fantastic that you had Tom Cotton as the guest. Nice going.
Great podcast.
Thank you.
Former Ricochet member DC McAllister on Sarah Palin’s endorsement of Trump:
That seems the most likely reason. It’s also possible that, whatever her reasoning, Palin thinks Trump would have better odds in the main election than Cruz or Rubio would.
By the way, what’s the opposite of populism? Aristocracy? These days, our representatives have representatives. When did we vote for that situation? My point is that, while populism is surely dangerous in extreme, it is good and necessary in moderation. Citizens should believe they are adequately represented.
I don’t believe Trump serves that need. But let’s not respond to one extreme with another by pretending this trend toward populism arose out of nowhere. It is a response to real problems, such as the negotiation of legislation by a mere handful of elected representatives and the ability of a felon to run for President because political leverage makes her untouchable.
I did.
Oh, heck – I still do. I’m just not listening to her anymore.
Not sure I understand the point. My point, if I was unclear, was based on this blizzard of rhetorical chaff:
It’s a common theme: the mere fact of his election will be sufficient to cow the entire social and political culture of liberalism. In the instances where his elevation does not bring about Change, he will make it happen, because he knows how and your head will spin there will be so much winning. People either cheer the remarks because department stores returning to “Merry Christmas” ad campaigns is a good idea, or because it’s a good idea they actually think his election will accomplish. The first is concurrence; the second is fantasy.
Believe me, believe me. You’re going to see a lot of things. You’re going to see beyond.
This piece on Vox.com about David Bowie’s 1987 performance at the Berlin Wall, just a week before a certain speech, is well worth reading (at least until the final two paragraphs, which are predictably stinting on credit where credit is due).
Guys just a tip, the best way to ruin a good podcast is to get Richard Epstein on & let him talk endlessly without taking a breath. Next time it happens I’m requesting a refund on the remainder of my subscription
Clearly, Peter had at least one more one-more-question for Tom Cotton. But Rob cut him off.
It is obvious that after the 2008 election and our president almost a reality show star himself. Obama has been on Bear Grylls’ show, every late night show, SNL, Marc Maron’s podcast, Between two ferns, etc….. This has deminished the office of president to what it is now, a celebrity job, like movie or rock star. The presidential election has turned into a popularity contest. Who’s the coolest, who had the best dance moves on Ellen, who had the best zingers on the Tonight show. The media creates a high school mentality, we’re the cool kids and run stuff and those guys are losers so don’t be friends with them or let them run anything.
This sad but true and Trump is a result of what the president has become, another celebrity.
Wow, really disappointed by Senator Cotton’s answer on encryption. Any “front door” would be abused by the malicious, including our national-security apparatus. Being one of government’s legitimate functions does not make them immune from the natural bureaucratic tendencies towards abuse of power and mission creep. The high-end criminals would just use better-encrypted means of communication, and our terrorism-protection apparatus failed to notice the San Bernardino shooter’s use of unencrypted communication.
On a different note, glad the guys appreciate how pure Sanders is. I completely disagree that he’d flame out in the general though. Sanders is consistent, authentic, experienced in politics, and “an outsider”. He is literally everything voters want in a candidate. We all underestimated Obama and Trump. There’s a significant chance Bernie wins the nomination, and a significant chance that if he’s the nominee, he’ll beat our guy. Especially when Republican incompetence, Obama’s get-out-the-vote machine, and the media shield on Dems are accounted for.
Of course you would you liberal NE Republican you……..I bet you liked Lincoln Chaffee and Lowell Weicker.
Funny. I was going to suggest that, if you’re going to have Richard Epstein on, you know he’s going to launch into these long-winded streams of consciousness, but you can never tell what interesting things are going come out of them. Let him run with them and don’t cut him off. He’ll roll to a stop, eventually.
Idea for the Blue Yeti:
Could someone code up a pool for the members, guessing how many minutes into each podcast before someone asks a guest to define “establishment”? Maybe the winner gets a free month’s membership.
We could make it a drinking game, but that might be too hard on our livers.
Or the question after that… if the FBI recommends indictment but the Justice Dept. doesn’t indict, what does that do to her politically? With the feeling among the public that government acts mostly to help itself, that could end up being worse than pleading guilty to a couple of ‘oops’ style misdemeanors.
LOL.
So, how did we get to the point in American politics where the ambient conditions stink so badly that a Cranky Old Coot like Bernie Sanders can break wind upstream of the body politic and we say, “Thank God for that breath of fresh air!”?
Add to this the fact that Hillary Clinton has completely failed to articulate any sort of a credible difference between herself (an allegedly mainstream Democrat) and a man who is an avowed socialist – Other than possessing an extra X Chromosome, that is.
The question is merely one of degree.
The main feed podcasters and writers seem to not like Trump, or anything connected with him. OK, neither do I although probably not to the same extent. But FFS, it’s becoming tedious.
Optimist
Peter’s remark about David Bowie made me like him and Bowie both more.
Agreed. Even assuming the government doesn’t succumb to abuse of power and mission creep, any key put in to allow an appropriate government authority to access data will be used by malicious third (fourth?) parties to access that data.
I’m guessing there’s a 30 percent chance Peter has heard a Bowie song. But I’m with him on the reaction. He just seemed like a guy who was around. Not someone people liked. So that surprised me.
I agree with Peter Robinson. #evergreenpost