Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Not Under A Bus Exactly: Hillary Clinton and Her Mother
The New York Times gets ready for Hillary by using her dead mother as a prop:
Dorothy Howell was 8 years old when her parents sent her away. It was 1927. Her mother and father, who fought violently in the Chicago boardinghouse where the family lived, divorced. Neither was willing to take care of Dorothy or her little sister.
So they put the girls on a train to California to live with their grandparents. It did not go well. Her grandmother favored black Victorian dresses and punished the girls for inexplicable infractions, like playing in the yard. (Dorothy was not allowed to leave her room for a year, other than for school, after she went trick-or-treating one Halloween.)
Unable to bear it, Dorothy left her grandparents’ home at 14, and became a housekeeper for $3 a week, always hoping to return to Chicago and reconnect with her mother. But when she finally did, a few years later, her mother spurned her again.
Charles Dickens would have been stumped to come up with such a story. I’m not doubting it’s veracity, just pondering it’s timeliness. Politician’s backstories are often part of the smoke and mirrors of modern political spin. Like Bill Clinton’s “A Place Called Hope” or Barack Obama’s paternal dreaming at one level it’s suppose to humanize candidates for political office. At a less honourable level it’s a cynical bait and switch: feel sorry for me, now vote for me.
However terrible the early life of Dorothy Howell the life of her daughter has been very different. A multi-millionaire who has not driven a car in decades, Hillary Clinton is part of the quasi-permanent ruling class of modern America. These two women inhabited very different economic and social universes. The invoking of a dead relative’s travails is mawkish at best; in the hands of a dedicated progressive it becomes outright creepy:
At the rally on Saturday on Roosevelt Island in New York City, the biggest public event so far of her 2016 campaign, Mrs. Clinton will explain how her mother’s experience shaped her life and inspired her to be an advocate for children and families at the Children’s Defense Fund, and as a first lady, senator and secretary of state.
Well, of course it did. Pause to consider the saccharine nonsense being pushed on the American voter. Why should an individual candidate’s family history have anything to do with the wisdom or folly of a particular public policy? There is a leap of logic that we are asked to make. We need to accept that a painful anecdote is justification for vast government programs costing billions. Programs that, if history is any guide, will aid their unionized administrators far more than their nominal beneficiaries.
Since at least the 1960s, the left’s mantra as been that the personal is the political. It doesn’t matter where the evidence or the math takes you, it’s whether you feel in your heart that it’s the right thing to do. The irony is that the very stories being used to sell statism to the American people often suggest a better direction:
In her 2014 book, “Hard Choices,” Mrs. Clinton described how one teacher in elementary school, realizing that Dorothy was too poor to buy milk at lunchtime, would buy two cartons herself every day and then say, “Dorothy, I can’t drink this other carton of milk. Would you like it?’ ” The woman who hired her as a teenage housekeeper took an interest in her, urging her to finish high school and giving her clothes. Mrs. Clinton has said these seemingly small gestures showed her mother the presence of goodness in the world, and later made her a caring mother and grandmother.
In other words it was private individuals, not government, who helped the young Dorothy Howell the most. A nice touch was how the teacher would offer the second carton of milk, making it seem like an afterthought rather than charity. The story reflects a moment in history when accepting private charity was seen as humiliating, even among the most deserving. The teacher was trying not to hurt the young girl’s pride. It’s the sort of gesture one sees from kind people, not from from remote bureaucracies.
That’s the real lesson to be taken from the story of Dorothy Howell, not the cynical spin being placed on it by her daughter’s handlers.
Published in General
Like.
Like, Like.
Regards,
Jim
Liberals believe in ‘inherited persecution’. If your race, gender, family etc has a claim to historical grievances, you hold moral authority. She is just staking claim to her authority. ‘Mom had a hard childhood, so implementation of my liberal statist policies is indisputable.’
This is completely off-topic and I have no idea what it means but that photo emphasizes just how far along Hillary has progressed toward turning into Gore Vidal.
Augh!
To be more specific: it emphasizes just how much Hillary sexually self-identifies as Gore Vidal.
Astounding! Not since the picture of Dorian Grey….
Transjenner America.
Regards,
Jim
To follow Shillary’s logic here, since she’s now a 1%-er, she must undo everything she’s done and instead of re-distribute wealth to the needy, she must become the Anti-Gore-Vidal, and do everything in her power to assist the wealthy.
Right? Because if you’re just comin’ up from the poor, you fight for them. So if you’re coming up rich, you fight for them.
Must be a hell of a confusing time in Hillary’s campaign headquarters. I swear the staff must be just following a laser pointer around the room, chasing post-it notes with short ideas written on them. Last staffer standing gets to make the call for the next gaffe, er, campaign decision.
What kind of campaign re-launches after its 2nd launch? Will there be a 4th launch? How many tries does Grandma get until we finally take the keys away from her?
I think her mother’s story is fair game for the campaign. Marco Rubio uses his parents’ story and it is very effective. Hillary is a terrible and unnatural speaker and Rubio is a golden speaker, so I’m not too worried about whose stories are going to be more effective.
My childhood was worse than Hillery’s mother, so under this criteria my daughter Kaylett, is qualified to be the next president of the USA. Vote Kaylett for president!