Pat Sajak · July 10, 2010 at 11:50pm

I used to be a wonderful speller. I understood the rules and the exceptions to the rules. I knew about roots and etymology. I could spell proper names, foreign words and just about anything else. However, after more than a decade of using Spell Check, I have trouble spelling anything and everything. I mean that literally; I have trouble spelling the words “anything” and “everything.” Spell Check has affected my spelling skills in the same way speed dialing affected my ability to remember phone numbers and GPS systems affected my being able to find my way around. It’s nice to be able to cut down on the clutter in your brain by turning such tasks over to technology; however, you then become a prisoner of that technology, unable to remember things that would ordinarily pose no problem. Without a computer or a cell phone or a GPS device, I can’t spell, I can’t call anyone and I can’t find anything.

There are additional problems when you allow a machine to do your spelling work. For one thing, it doesn’t notice if you use a wrong word if that word actually exists. Did you type “me” instead of “my?” “There” instead of “their?” Spell Check doesn’t much care. You also have to be careful about the list of alternative words most Spell Check systems offer. When checking a document or an email, it’s easy to accidentally substitute an inappropriate word. I once emailed a friend in Honolulu and used the Hawaiian word for “thank you” (Mahalo). Spell Check didn’t recognize the word and offered “Maalox” as an alternative. That would have changed the message’s meaning in a number of strange ways.

Happily, Ricochet is set up in way that allows spelling to be checked (with the same shortcomings of other such systems). So if there are any spelling problems in this little essay, don’t go blaming my!

Comments:


tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

Pat: A little story on the problem of misspelling a word with another word.

The words "public" and "pubic" are quite similar, and Spell Check doesn't warn you that you may have substituted one for the other.

As an attorney, I do work before public utility commissions in various states. Let's just say that I referred to a public utility commission in an unnamed state by using the other very similar word. Not the highest point of my storied career.

Pat Sajak

I'm sure Public Defenders' offices have had similar issues.

Jimmie Bise Jr
Joined
May '10
Jimmie Bise Jr

And Republicans.

~Paules
Joined
Jun '10
~Paules

I think Spell Check is the greatest invention since the printing press. Of course, I'm of the age when we learned to type on manual machines and then scrubbed off our errors with an eraser that looked somewhat like a precambrian sea creature. Half the effort (and more than half the time) in producing a decent college term paper was entirely mechanical.

Dave Carter

Pat, here is yet another wrinkle. Most of my emails and posts to Ricochet are done via Droid smart phone. It's much more convenient for me, as a long haul trucker, than trying to find WIFI hot spots for my lap top. The problem arises with the little virtual keyboard thingamabob that I use to compose. It not only suggest different words if it doesn't recognize the one I am typing out,..it inserts them! That little feature has caused me no small amount of anguish, and taught me to re-read my work several times. Of course, even then, I don't catch everything. Fortunately, Ricochet's editors have saved my bacon more than once. My favorite line, by the way: "Bad spellers of the world, untie!"

James Poulos, Ed.

One book I keep waiting for: an adaptation of the inevitable online warehouse of auto-correct failures. Here's a good one. My favorite: MS Word suggests replacing "Aguilera" with "uglier."

Nick Stuart
Joined
May '10
Nick Stuart

I saw this in the early '80s taped to the side of a phototypesetting console. It probably goes back to Gutenberg, and a variant before that to the scribes of antiquity.

Ever Have A "Typo?

The typographic error

Is a slipery thing and sly

You can hun til you are dizzy

But is somehow will get by

Till the forms are off the presses

It is strange how still it keeps,

It shrinks down in a corner

And it never stirs orpeeps

The typographic error

Is to small for human eyes

Till the ink is on the paper ..

When it grows to mountain size

The boss she stares with horror

Then grabs her hair and groans

The copy reader drops his head

Upon his hands and moans

The remainder of the issue

May be clean as clean can bee,

But that typographic error

Is the olny thing you sea

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

I'm "old school," I proofread and then just put Liquid Paper on my monitor.


Joined
Jun '10
Wordcooper

And of course, the robot overlords continue to evolve. The ad next to your post is for Grammarly, Instant Grammar Checker. Next they will be writing for you...

and a happy time that will be. All we will have to do it relax by the pool.

--Comment finished by Robitor, your friendly editor.

Cas Balicki
Joined
Jun '10
Cas Balicki

When you add Google to spell check you get Stupid R Us. In another generation a television show such as “Jeopardy” will have no contestants, because no one will remember anything. What future generations will do is Google everything. Twenty years from now if you ask someone, “Who was Alexander Graham Bell?” You’re likely to get by way of answer, “Give me a second and I’ll Google him on my iPhone.” Move along folks, there’s no irony to see here.

David Cavanaugh
Joined
May '10
David Cavanaugh

Exactly. I was just thinking just this morning that both my parents and grandparents had encyclopedia sets, dictionaries and a thesaurus or two.

We, however, do not own a dictionary, let alone an encyclopedia series (can they even be bought anymore?). It has been 10 years since we've even had a phone book. Well, we did get something resembling a phone book on the doorstep last week, but I think it's already hit the recycling.

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

I haven't used any spell-check program in years. I Google the word and a link to Merriam-Webster's definition is usually on the first page.

I also use that method to ensure a word means what I think it means. It seems I do that more and more -- perhaps a sign of just the sort of brain rot you describe, Pat. Maybe it's better to just wing it.

George Savage
Wordcooper: And of course, the robot overlords continue to evolve.

Maybe Wordcooper has the reason why I can't seem to post anything critical of the Democrats from my roost in Silicon Valley. Here, let me try again: "I love the Obama administration." Did that come through?

Lilium
Joined
May '10
Lilium

I suppose it's not too dissimilar to younger generations and their reliance on calculators to the detriment of basic arithmetic skills.

As a TESOL teacher for many years I will speak in defence of spell-checkers at least in so much as they reduce the number of spelling mistakes in essays by non-native speakers. It doesn't deal with all the problems as noted by others but for a weary teacher, it reduces the number of red marks one has to insert into the text.

Andrea Ryan
Joined
May '10
Andrea Ryan

My worst experience with spell check was when I was running late for a Board meeting. I took a call in the parking lot and sent one of my fellow Board members a text to let him know I would be there soon. My text went through as "I'll join you in sex". It was supposed to be "sec".

Tom Lindholtz
Joined
May '10
Tom Lindholtz

Another For Nick

Spell Checker................

 

Eye halve a spelling chequer

 

It came with my pee sea

 

It plainly marques four my revue

 

Miss steaks eye ken knot sea.

 

Eye strike a quay and type a word

 

And weight four it two say

 

Weather eye am wrong oar write

 

It shoos me strait a weigh.

 

As soon as a mist ache is maid

 

It nose bee fore two long

 

And eye can put the error rite

 

Its rare lea ever wrong.

 

Eye have run this poem threw it

 

I am shore your pleased two no

 

Its letter perfect awl the weigh

 

My chequer tolled me sew.

 

-Sores unknown

Matthew Gilley
Joined
May '10
Matthew Gilley

This thread reminds me of a favorite post from our compadres at Power Line. On January 6, 2008, Paul Mirengoff quipped, "We'll know that Huckabee has truly arrived when the spell-check on my computer stops changing his name to 'Chickadee.'"

Pat Sajak

Mine suggests changing "Sajak" to "Seajack."

outstripp
Joined
May '10
outstripp

Sajak

Pat Sajak: Mine suggests changing "Sajak" to "Seajack." · Jul 11 at 8:26pm

Mine does too! And then it asks for a ransom to change it back....


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In