You Get What You Pay For
Pat Sajak ·
Aug 3, 2010 at 8:20am
- Comment (11)
- · Quote
- · UnfollowFollow (2)
| © 2012 Silent Cal Productions | Help • About • Contact • FAQ • Code of Conduct • Terms & Conditions • Privacy • Store • Site Map • DMCA |
Comments :
Feb '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
... And the buyer probably got the raw end of the deal!
Jun '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
It's like buying Yugo for the nameplate.
Jun '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
Where is Monty Hall when you need him?
Re: You Get What You Pay For
"Harman added that his 'primary responsibility' will be building a succession plan for Newsweek to hand it over to his children or an outside owner upon his death." Sullivan: "And one might have hoped that a new owner taking it into the new era might a) have a plan and b) be younger than 91. "
Re: You Get What You Pay For
To my children, I bequeath the old Barcalounger chair that I died in...
Jun '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
And the only reason there was any positive value was that George Will writes a column every couple of weeks. If not for that, they'd have had to pay to have someone take it.
Re: You Get What You Pay For
Here's the Heritage Foundation's James Carafano on how to save Newsweek: "Put Sarah Palin on the cover of every issue. No, serious. Bet sales would go up."
May '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
Here's the question: Will the buyer get change?
Jul '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
The buyer can only hope.
May '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
I did like Byron York's tweet: "Why did I pay $5.95 for a single copy of Newsweek, when I could have bought the whole company for $1.00?"
May '10
Re: You Get What You Pay For
According the WSJ/All Things Digital, Harman told the employees at Newsweek, "I'm not here to make money." If that's true then he is in the right place.