My father reflects upon the expectations he once held for scientific inquiry and what he imagined we would know in the year 2011. We find ourselves, he says, without the unifying, powerful theories he expected to see by now.

Instead, he suggests, we're in "slack-jawed perplexity." 

Comments:


Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

Tommy De Seno: What magic spell do we have to cast to get David Berlinski to appear and join our conversation?

By the way Mark and Brian thanks for this conversation.  You're both knowledgable on the subject and formidable in your arguments - why Ricochet exists! · Jun 15 at 9:02pm

Tommy, thank you as well. Sorry for the late response. It's always a hoot and as I learned years ago in debates with my father, it never really needs to get personal. It's the reason that I skulk around Ricochet and annoy people with my cockemamie ideas, claims and crass pronouncements. I do know that religion is a very cherished topic and I'm doing all I can to restrain my inclination for vitriol. I realize I sometimes fail on that front...but I'm trying.

Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

Midget Faded Rattlesnake

Brian Watt

If you determine that Scripture is not the word of God but still intend on using it as a guide for ethics...

Well, the way I see it is that the Bible is a narrative that tells of the Word of God. It is peculiar in many ways, and must be interpreted in historical context (not only of the actual events, but the context of those who preserved the scriptures) to be edifying, but it is first and foremost a story rather than an ethical guide.

Yes, understand. I was simply replying to the hypothetical you proposed.

Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

Tommy De Seno:

By the way Mark and Brian thanks for this conversation.  You're both knowledgable on the subject and formidable in your arguments - why Ricochet exists!

Cheers, Tommy.  I enjoyed it thoroughly.

Tommy De Seno

Brian Watt

Tommy De Seno: What magic spell do we have to cast to get David Berlinski to appear and join our conversation?

By the way Mark and Brian thanks for this conversation.  You're both knowledgable on the subject and formidable in your arguments - why Ricochet exists! · Jun 15 at 9:02pm

Tommy, thank you as well. Sorry for the late response. It's always a hoot and as I learned years ago in debates with my father, it never really needs to get personal. It's the reason that I skulk around Ricochet and annoy people with my cockemamie ideas, claims and crass pronouncements. I do know that religion is a very cherished topic and I'm doing all I can to restrain my inclination for vitriol. I realize I sometimes fail on that front...but I'm trying. · Jun 15 at 10:54pm

I didn't see you getting personal.   I hope you stay around Ricochet.  Ricochet needs you and your willingness to punch it out with the contributors.

Wouldn't it be terrible if Ricochet  became a place where conservatives spend time slapping eath other on the back and telling each other how smart they are?

 

Claire Berlinski, Ed.
Tommy De Seno: What magic spell do we have to cast to get David Berlinski to appear and join our conversation?

Hey, I like to think I did get him to appear and join the conversation! 

Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

Tommy De Seno: What magic spell do we have to cast to get David Berlinski to appear and join our conversation?

Hey, I like to think I did get him to appear and join the conversation!  · Jun 16 at 1:37pm

Yo! Yeowoman's work, dear Claire! You are to be commended and applauded! Well done and thanks for your tenacious and fruitful efforts. All the best!


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In