sports-portal-margaret-thatcher-small-35459

I'm working on the revised introduction to my book, and I'm curious about your first thoughts about that question. I'd also be curious to know how you've revised them, if you have, since the last edition was released last year. Doesn't matter if you've read it, I'm just curious about perceptions.

I'd also appreciate any interesting links you've seen to anything written about her lately that I may have missed--particularly in places where the breadth of her influence is often underestimated, for example the developing countries that initiated market liberalization in the wake of the Thatcher revolution. 

Or, frankly, I'm procrastinating. But it feels more like working on what I'm supposed to do than contemplating the Greco-Roman influence on Western culture or reading the new Wikileaks cables on Turkey. And yes, I managed to convince myself, yesterday, that nothing could be a more important use of my time, so I lost a day.  Work really does consist of whatever a body is obliged to do, and play really does consist of whatever a body is not obliged to do.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

David Williamson
Joined
Mar '11
David Williamson

Claire, sorry I haven't yet read your book - maybe when you have the new intro.

You may have already covered it, but something I heard recently about how Mrs Thatcher mishandled the negotiations with China over Hong Kong is relevant today - a foretaste of what Mr Steyn would call the handing over of global leadership from the UK to the US, and now onto China.

The next step will be how the US handles Taiwan.

The other thought I had, somewhat related, was when listening to Peter's interview with Charles Moore - there is no way the UK could now do the Falklands War. The Harrier jets have been retired, the Ark Royal will be a tourist attraction in Hong Kong harbor, and the next UK aircraft carrier will be shared with the French, with no UK aircraft to put on it - sigh.

Edited on Aug 26, 2011 at 1:45am
J.Voss
Joined
Jul '11
J.Voss

Claire,

Lady Thatcher is important because she proved once and for all that a nations' greatness is never lost so long as there are brave souls willing to defend it.  The Lady rallied a nation in distress and gave Britain her dignity back.

To inject a little personal opinion here, I think the marvel that is Thatcher is especially profound when compared with her successors.  Had John Major proven as formidable as Thatcher, she would appear less 'special.'  With that said, because of the total lunacy that followed Major, both he and the Lady Thatcher both appear as giants amongst pygmies.  Just my two cents.

Edited on Aug 26, 2011 at 1:56am
Stu In Tokyo
Joined
May '11
Stu In Tokyo

The only thing I can add is I'm constantly surprised at how sideways my lefty friends go if I even mention Lady Thatcher, the ones from the UK start to actually foam at the mouth, it is quite entertaining.

I must read your book, it is on my list.

Domo

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

I'm up too early to add anything relevant except that this picture reminds of the Queen's parody twitter account when it says:

"Goodness, look at the time: its Gin O'Clock."

Paul Snively
Joined
Oct '10
Paul Snively

Claire, if you'll please forgive the triteness of the observations, Lady Thatcher matters because:

  1. England continues to occupy strategic geopolitical and economic ground. Hitler knew it when the V2 rockets rained on London; The Politburo knew it while Lady Thatcher was in office. England needed her principled leadership in the face of the expansionist interpretation of Communism of the Soviet Union.
  2. The freedom a nation guarantees to its citizens, and protects, is distressingly often highly correlated with the freedom it guarantees and protects to its women. Lady Thatcher's being a politician, let alone Prime Minister, both reflects important elements of English liberty and serves as inspiration to other nations.
  3. By temperament and shared values, Lady Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, and Pope John Paul II were well suited as partners in the Cold War. Key to this, IMHO, was a shared appreciation of the moral dimension of liberty and the value of being a happy warrior. Liberty is fun, and as serious as Lady Thatcher is, it was always obvious that she knows this.
Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Doesn't matter if you've read it, I'm just curious about perceptions.

The riots prove that what Britain needed was more Thatcher and less Blair.


Joined
Oct '10
AngloCon

Maggie matters because she was the most effective free world leader in the second half of the twentieth century at a time when it mattered profoundly for her country and ours.

I could go on about particulars, but they would only illustrate, not state, my point. Unfortunately I haven't the time for illustrations. You already know the rest. You wrote a book about it.

John Marzan
Joined
Oct '10
John Marzan

The new movie about her portrays margaret thatcher as "granny going mad".

I miss the 80s music and the heroic figures of that time: Reagan, Thatcher, Pope John Paul 2, Lech Walesa, Cory Aquino. I even miss Gorbachev and his Glasnost/Perestroika thing.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.
Paul Snively: Claire, if you'll please forgive the triteness of the observations, Lady Thatcher matters because: · Aug 26 at 3:06am

Is there a reason you specify England? 

Not JMR
Joined
Nov '10
Jan-Michael Rives

Logging into ricochet is the absolute worst thing you can do when you're trying to be productive.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.
Jan-Michael Rives: Logging into ricochet is the absolute worst thing you can do when you're trying to be productive. · Aug 26 at 4:29am

It gets even more complicated when you can say to yourself, "Why, I am being productive. This is my job, and I believe in it."

Skyler
Joined
May '11
Skyler

I don't have a response to your particular question, because I'm on 1/10th through your book and the reason I'm reading your book is that I always felt I didn't know enough detail about her.

I will offer, however, that the photo-shopped picture is very disturbing.

Herkybird
Joined
Apr '11
Herkybird

Margaret Thatcher matters because she was right.  When she said Gorbachev was someone the West could do business with I thought, 'l love you Maggie but you're nuts of you think this.' But she was right, and being right she changed the course of history.

But she was right about something else: she was right that the British were still capable of doing great things. There's an anecdote in your book about a Miner that encapsulates in microcosm what I mean:

"Harry always had a knack for drawing...When the pits closed he found himself sketching scenes from the mines...unemployed, he submitted one of those drawings to a local competition and won...His paintings are now prized by collectors and sold for thousands of pounds...Which image is more repugnant? Is it that of a middle-aged man his body wrecked from a life of hard labor being told he must now find a new job...Or is it the image of Harry, at the bottom of a coal mine, tracing images in the dust on the wall with his finger."

In light of the recent riots, it seems this lesson too has been lost of forgotten.

StickerShock
Joined
Jun '10
StickerShock

 It is hard to discuss Reagan without including Thatcher and JPII.  They are/were giants.

Her handling of the "Irish issue" was not her finest hour.  There are still murals in Belfast with her likeness, denouncing her and her policies.  The Broadway musical Billy Elliott has a lyric wishing for her death.  Rarely have I heard such vitriolic comments about any other human being than I have from both Americans of Irish ancestry and Irish. 

Scott Reusser
Joined
May '10
Scott Reusser

 Wish you could see this new movie first so you could refute some of the misrepresentations that will no doubt be in it.

Preemptively on that front: it's likely there will be some suggestion in the movie (as there has been from many sources) that the 2008 downturn was the result of Anglo-American anything-goes Reagan/Thatcherism, so the thrust of your intro should be to explain why the events of today (the riots, the collapse of the welfare state, the unworkable Euro, Obamanomics) serve to vindicate Thatcher, rather than her opponents.

There's also the more general collapse of tradition and common sense in the West that needs discussing. Here, Melanie Phillips's The World Turned Upside Down would be a great source. Nothing better illustrates Thatcher's point that "the facts of life are conservative" than that book. 

nick
Joined
Jan '11
nick

As wise and courageous as she was, she failed to stem the collapse of a once-great culture. There's a lesson in that.

~Paules
Joined
Jun '10
~Paules

If you grew up during the Cold War as I did, you probably believed that the Soviet Union was a permanent fixture.  Very few people saw the possibility that the USSR would simply implode.  After all, even the best minds in the CIA completely missed this eventuality.

Reagan, Thatcher and John Paul II became part of an historical triumvirate that you don't often see in history.  Their combination of vision and resolve provided a fulcrum upon which the soviets were leveraged into the dustbin of history.  Maybe the USSR would have collapsed anyway.  But the three great leaders were proactive in seeing it happen.  No small accomplishment.

Edited on Aug 26, 2011 at 7:18am
StickerShock
Joined
Jun '10
StickerShock

~Paules: If you grew up during the Cold War as I did, you probably believed that the Soviet Union was a permanent fixture.  Very few people saw the possibility that the USSR would simply implode.  After all, even the best minds in the CIA completely this eventuality.

Reagan, Thatcher and John Paul II became part of an historical triumvirate that you don't often see in history.  Their combination of vision and resolve provided a fulcrum upon which the soviets were leveraged into the dustbin of history.  Maybe the USSR would have collapsed anyway.  But the three great leaders were proactive in seeing it happen.  No small accomplishment. · Aug 26 at 6:34am

Yes....in my mind, this is why Thatcher matters.

Charlotte
Joined
Apr '11
Charlotte
Skyler: I will offer, however, that the photo-shopped picture is very disturbing. · Aug 26 at 4:39am

Would it be more or less disturbing if you learned that it wasn't Photoshopped?

Paul Snively
Joined
Oct '10
Paul Snively
Claire Berlinski, Ed. Is there a reason you specify England?  · Aug 26 at 4:03am

If you mean "other than lack of precision," er, no. :-) I mean neither that she wasn't Prime Minister of the entire UK, nor to offend the Scots, Irish, Welsh...


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In