Scott Reusser · February 18, 2012 at 7:59pm

Prof. Rahe made an interesting claim in the comment section of Ben's recent post. He remains confident we'll win in November but lists SCOTUS's possible overturning of Obamacare -- which would moot one of our best issues -- as an event that might undermine that victory.

Not sure where I stand on that -- on either the optimism part or the belief that a decision against Obamacare would work in Obama's favor. In regards the latter, it might have the opposite effect by giving Supreme-Court-level legitimacy to our claims that Obama is a radical and a rogue. I just don't know. But certainly Prof. Rahe's theory is plausible.

Question:  If you agree with Prof. Rahe's analysis of the political implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, does it follow that you'll be rooting for Obamacare this spring?

That's a tough one, no? Personally, I'll be rooting against it -- on the belief that its overturning would be a very important "bird in the hand" in a year of unknowns.

Comments:


The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

I won't root for it to win in any way, ever. It is unconstitutional. If the elected branches were to withdraw it before or after a favorable Supreme Court ruling it could always be brought back. The court and the elected branches must all declare such activity beyond their legitimate powers.

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin

I would agree with Prof. Rahe, not because it takes the Obamacare issue off the table (in my view, running Romney as the nominee already does that cf. Romneycare), but because overturning Obamacare will fire up that part of his base that believes free healthcare is a human right and that we need European-style socialized medicine ASAP. They will run to the polls to vote for the guy who they think will give it to us.

Among my lefty pals, the consensus seems to be that they dislike Obamacare, but see it as a step toward a universal healthcare system. They will work hard to get Obama re-elected because they feel that regardless of what he says, what he believes in is free healthcare for everyone.

So no, it won't help him because it's off the table; it'll help fire up his base to get something like it as a replacement. That's my view.

Leigh
Joined
Nov '11
Leigh

I'm with King Prawn.  I want the Court to do the right thing; consequences are too hard to predict.

What would Obama's pitch be?  "Sure, my first attempt to fix healthcare was unconstitutional and unpopular, but please give me a second chance!"

What if the Court overturns only the individual mandate? Does it give us the best of both worlds -- i.e. he flagrantly violated the Constitution, and we have to vote him out to finish undoing his work.  Particularly if Romney is the nominee -- he could say "see, I told you so, it's unconstitutional on the federal level" and focus on the remaining parts which are not so directly similar to Massachusetts.

Or would that ruling leave many people thinking the issue has gone away while in fact the rest of the horrible mess remains in place?

Leigh
Joined
Nov '11
Leigh

DrewInWisconsin:

So no, it won't help him because it's off the table; it'll help fire up his base to get something like it as a replacement. That's my view. · 7 minutes ago

Makes sense.  In which case the Republicans need to say something like:  Their  first attempt was horrible, unpopular, and unconstitutional -- and now they're working on something even worse.  Why ever would we give him the opportunity to try again?

Edited on February 17, 2012 at 4:04pm

Joined
Feb '12
Monty

I fear that Romney takes Obama care off the table.  It isn't just the forced purchase of insurance.  Lots of hospitals and the Catholic Health Association support that BECAUSE they are required to give free care to those who come and have no money nor insurance.   There is a committee that operates outside of any oversight which sets standards for preventive care...they can give as in free contraceptives for ALL women, but they can also take away as in things costly but not sufficient benefit ((all based on research in past years and perhaps obsolete at the moment.))  Obama doubles down and will cover all procedures.  Medicare is the biggest rationing scheme already.  Ask anyone willing to talk off the record.

Krauthammer hits some of these issues today in WaPo.   Worse the whole program in Massachusetts leaves out any consumer oriented market forces.... therein lies a way to control cost. Otherwise WISE MEN and WOMEN will decide by rationing treatments.....

Jacob Fox
Joined
Feb '12
Jacob Foxx

I am more afraid of the precedent set if Obamacare is ruled constitutional than the possible political problems it might create for Republicans in one election. I also disagree with Rahe on the point itself. Obamacare has been consistently unpopular with a majority of Americans. If it is struck down, Obama can only argue the Supreme Court needs to be reined in for being radical - but I really doubt that argument gets very far. The main legislative achievement of his first term gone, I think it dooms him in November.

Nanda Panjandrum
Joined
Nov '11
Nancy Dunham

Against it on principle, not certain of the political effects, though.  We've seen the Law of Unintended Consequences at work frequently, it seems. 

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England
The King Prawn: I won't root for it to win in any way, ever. It is unconstitutional. If the elected branches were to withdraw it before or after a favorable Supreme Court ruling it could always be brought back. The court and the elected branches must all declare such activity beyond their legitimate powers. · 14 hours ago

This seems right, and handily the moral good and the partisan good are aligned here. Overturning Obamacare would underline Romney's message that Obama doesn't understand his job or constitutional limitations; I've not heard so many Santorum speeches on Obama, but I'm guessing it'd support him, too.

raycon and lindacon
Joined
Oct '10
raycon

If you are confident that SCOTUS will overturn O-Care I have just three words for you:

CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM

Thank you GW Bush.  You confidence in SCOTUS was rewarded amply.

Remember, our best hope of survival is the GOP!

~Paules
Joined
Jun '10
~Paules

I'm rooting for the restoration of our republic based on constitutional principles.  It's going to take more than a victory over a single piece of legislation.  We are so deep into a crisis that is one part constitutional, one part economic, and one part moral that I'm nearly drawn to despair.  God Save the Republic!

Mendel
Joined
Mar '11
Mendel

I will also root for a declaration of unconstitutional for 2 reasons:

1) per the other comments in this thread, proper Supreme Court rulings and the halting of this misuse of the Commerce Clause takes precedent over everything else, and

2) I don't trust a Republican president, even Gingrich or Santorum, to repeal the PPACA, even with Republican majorities in both houses. 

Yeah...ok.
Joined
Jan '11
Yeah...ok.

The court should overturn Obamacare. If the whole shebang (I thought there was no severability clause?) is thrown out I think it would provide an immediate boost to the economy.

Short of an Iranian October surprise or some other crisis, Obama will lose. Any other outcome will just be evidence that we've crossed the tipping point.

Fixing this will be painful.


Joined
Dec '10
Alan Weick

Campaign Finance "Reform" was signed into law by W even though he thought it unconstitutional because he thought the SCOTUS would strike it down and because he didn't want to spend the political capital.  How'd that work out?  We should want the court as well all political actors to do the right thing by the Constitution, regardless.  Spinning wheels within wheels regarding a court case as it relates to the general election is counter-productive.  Obama deliberately pushed for the case to be decided before the election figuring that the outcome helps him either way.  If Romney is the nominee he, and we, should be looking for the most effective ways to articulate the conservative philosophy and why it is far superior to nanny state Obamaism both morally and economically stressing how both sets of policies have fared in the laboratory of reality.  How well we make our case to the American people is what is going to decide this election, not the side show of court cases.

Peter Robinson

You know what, Scott?  I almost don't care if overturning ObamaCare helped re-elect our current chief executive.  If his signal "accomplishment" had been found unconstitutional, wouldn't he prove less dangerous over the next four years?

I don't care when, I don't care how, and I don't care by whom.  ObamaCare delenda est. 

Bereket Kelile
Joined
Oct '10
bereket kelile

Assuming Obamacare is ruled unconstitutional and it gets Obama reelected, he will not have the filibuster-proof Congress that he had for the first two years. I would think that means he won't get anything passed that comes close to Obamacare. My guess is he might drop it altogether and focus on some other issue.

Illiniguy
Joined
Mar '11
Illiniguy

DrewInWisconsin: 

Among my lefty pals, the consensus seems to be that they dislike Obamacare, but see it as a steptowarda universal healthcare system. They will work hard to get Obama re-elected because they feel that regardless of what he says, what he believes in is free healthcare for everyone.

So no, it won't help him because it's off the table; it'll help fire up his base to get something like it as a replacement. That's my view. · Feb. 17

If it's off the table because of a reversal in the Court, it will help him precisely because it'll fire up the base to move toward single payor, which is Obama's goal, as well.

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

Here's my political, and mostly unprincipled, analysis:

  1. If upholding Obamacare will assure that we can beat Obama and control both houses of Congress so that we can repeal it, I'm for that (even though it leaves us with a bad precedent for the future).
  2. If Obama has a strong chance of winning even if Obamacare is overturned, then I hope the Court overturns it.
  3. If I could be assured that the Court would overturn it and we would still beat Obama, then that's the best of all worlds (in this scenario, both principle and politics align).  

The problem is that each scenario contains variables that cannot be determined with any assurance.  Given that, I pray the Court does the right thing and kills it.  In other words, to quote Peter:  "I don't care when, I don't care how, and I don't care by whom.  ObamaCare delenda est."

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

The stench of the legislative conduct surrounding the passage of ObamaCare will long survive any strike down or repeal. If the GOP fails to repeal, or then immediately pushes for more of the same as a "replacement", their claims on small government voters and candidates will vanish like a summer mist. 

The Supreme Court should do the right thing. Only the GOP can save Obama now.

raycon and lindacon
Joined
Oct '10
raycon
bereket kelile: Assuming Obamacare is ruled unconstitutional and it gets Obama reelected, he will not have the filibuster-proof Congress that he had for the first two years. I would think that means he won't get anything passed that comes close to Obamacare. My guess is he might drop it altogether and focus on some other issue. · 3 minutes ago

What uncharacteristic naivete, Bereket.  I believe you know better. 

Remember, our best hope of survival is the GOP!

R0bert Scott
Joined
Apr '11
R0bert Scott
Peter Robinson: I don't care when, I don't care how, and I don't care by whom.  ObamaCare delenda est.  · 16 minutes ago

Not sure I agree.  If the Supreme Court upholds Obamacare, it will mean that the Anthony Kennedy court no longer recognizes any limits on federal intrusion into all aspects of our lives.  Federalism, already on life support and about to receive Last Rites, will expire.  Much better that the Supreme Court overturn it than a transient Republican majority in Congress repeal it.

Let's posit an explicit tradeoff that many posters have already hinted at:  Supreme Court overturns and Obama is reelected or Supreme Court upholds and Republicans take the Senate and the presidency and hold the House.  Which is the preferable outcome?


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In