Rob Long · December 28, 2012 at 12:00am

And I don't mean this metaphorically. I'm not talking about a fiscal cliff or a socialist America. I'm bored, frankly, of politics, so I'm spending the next few days reading about cool stuff I don't understand.

Like Black Holes. And what happens when you fall into them. From Scientific American:

According to current theories of physics, a black hole is mostly just empty space. Its perimeter or “event horizon” is not a material surface, but just a hypothetical location that marks the point of no return. Once inside, you are gripped too tightly by gravity ever to get back out. By then, falling at nearly the speed of light, you have a few seconds to look around before you reach the very center and get crushed into oblivion. But nothing noticeable should happen at the moment of crossing. One of Einstein’s great insights was that observers who are freely falling—whether into a black hole or toward the ground—don’t feel the force of gravity, since everything around them is falling, too. As they say, it’s not the fall that kills you; it’s the sudden stop at the end.

Do you get all stretchy? Unclear:

To the infalling observer, space looks like a vacuum, and in quantum theory, a vacuum is a very special state of affairs. It is a region of space that is empty of particles. It is not a region that is empty of everything. There’s no getting rid of the electromagnetic field and other fields. (If you could, the region would not merely be empty, but nonexistent.) A particle is nothing more or less than a vibration one of these fields, and what makes a vacuum a vacuum is that all the possible vibrations cancel one another precisely, leaving the fields becalmed. To maintain this finely balanced condition, the vibrations must be thoroughly quantum-entangled with one another.

To the outgoing observer, the horizon (or membrane) cleaves space in two, and the vibrations no longer appear to cancel out. It looks like there are particles flying off in every direction. This is perfectly compatible with the infalling observer’s viewpoint, since the fields are what is fundamental and the presence of particles is a matter of perspective. To put it differently, emptiness is a holistic property in quantum physics—true for a region of space in its entirety, but not for individual subregions.

I'm lost. I feel like falling into a black hole can't be any more baffling than reading about falling into a black hole. But at least I'm not alone:

Someone falling into a black hole doesn’t pass uneventfully through the horizon, but hits a wall of fire and is instantly incinerated. “I think it’s crazy,” [physicist Joe] Polchinski admitted. But in order for a black hole to decay and its contents to spill out, as quantum mechanics demands, the infalling observer can’t see just a vacuum. The firewall idea strikes me as similar to past speculation that black holes are somehow material objects—so-called black stars or dark matter stars—rather than merely blank space.

“I spent 20 years confused by this,” Polchinski said, “and now I’m as confused as ever.” It would be nice to answer the question, if only so that no one ever has to undertake the journey to answer the question.

Actually, I have a better example: after a holiday feast, plump with sugar and animal fat and wine and dairy, I fall into a black hole. On the sofa.

Comments:


EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

Rob Long... in the Age of Obama

Age of Obama
Brady Kiel
Joined
May '10
Brady Kiel

I get a vision of escaping Maximilian Schell and then coming out near Earth...or something.

Slide1

Happy New Year Rob & Ricochet!

Eric Hines
Joined
Dec '12
eehines

There are a couple of things, and they have to do with the concept of relativity.  Do you get all stretchy?  Seems clear to me.  From the perspective of your constituent atoms--and their constituents, the protons, electrons, and neutrons (and perhaps from the perspective of their constituents, as well), the gravity gradient varies significantly over the distances involved in traveling from your head to your toes--even from the distances between an atom's nucleus and its "orbiting" electrons (in quotes because that's only a way of visualizing things--the location of the electrons--even of the protons and neutrons--is only a probability guess, until something comes along and explicitly looks at them).  Your body does get stretched out as your toes (I'm assuming you jumped into the hole, rather than dove in) are enough closer to the black hole than is your head to experience a significantly stronger pull of gravity.  With your toes accelerating faster than your head, you're stretching.

Finally, the canceling is a relative thing, too.  From our perspective, there is smoothness.  From the quark's perspective, there is much dissonance.  Planck's Length matters.

Eric Hines

Casey
Joined
Mar '11
Casey

I made the mistake of mentioning this to my wife. Now I have to go vacuum.

Pilli
Joined
May '11
Pilli

Neither light nor matter can escape from a Black Hole ( hence the term "Black" hole and not a midmight blue hole or a dark chocolate hole.)

So how is it that gravity "escapes" from a Black Hole?

John Walker
Joined
Oct '10
John Walker

Here is an animation of falling into a black hole.  This is based upon the assumption that the “firewall” doesn't exist and that crossing the event horizon is no big thing.

The firewall makes no sense to me.  I understand how a stationary observer near the event horizon would be incinerated by Unruh radiation, but I fail to see any way an in-falling observer crossing the event horizon would perceive anything at all other than the tidal stretch getting a bit more severe.

Eric Hines
Joined
Dec '12
eehines

Pilli: Neither light nor matter can escape from a Black Hole ( hence the term "Black" hole and not a midmight blue hole or a dark chocolate hole.)

So how is it that gravity "escapes" from a Black Hole? · 4 minutes ago

You're assuming the gravity originates from within the black hole.

Eric Hines

James Jones
Joined
Apr '11
James Jones
John Walker: The firewall makes no sense to me.  I understand how a stationary observer near the event horizon would be incinerated by Unruh radiation, but I fail to see any way an in-falling observer crossing the event horizon would perceive anything at all other than the tidal stretch getting a bit more severe. · 6 minutes ago

It's Hawking radiation, not Unruh radiation, that causes the firewall.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

Ever since Oreck sold the vaccuum company, I am convinced that things just suck in general. Now I see that Hoover is gone, what's left ?

I started with  Evelyn Waugh on Nov 7, haven't looked back. 

I look up in the sky and wonder why the hell NASA and the USA quit trying to send men up there and satisfied themselves with pictures. Now I know , no voters in outer space.

R. Craigen
Joined
Nov '10
R. Craigen

My cats consistently run for their lives when we turn on the vacuum cleaner, fearing they'll be sucked into a black hole along with the spiders and chunks of candy cane now ground into the carpet.

Their reaction only serves to illustrate that famous dictum:

Nature abhors a vacuum.


Joined
Apr '11
Raxxalan

Admittedly it has been a while since I researched this at all. I was under the impression though that beyond the event horizon it is impossible to apply normal physics. The normal constants take on new meaning and things that do not normally have importance in the quantum scale, like gravity, now have a measurable effect. In the end it may be like other fields of physics, Newtonian physics is a reasonable description of the way things work on a global scale; however is insufficient to a universal scale, Relativity works well on a Universal scale but breaks down on a quantum scale. Maybe quantum physics is insufficient to describe the space beyond the event horizon.


Joined
Apr '11
Raxxalan

I believe the firewall theory comes from the fact that black holes radiate a tremendous amount of thermal energy.

Joan of Ark La Tex
Joined
Jun '12
Joan of Ark La Tex

Very elitist suicidal thoughts. Take care. Thanks for entertaining the rest of us though :) 

I. raptus
Joined
Jun '10
I. raptus

The "firewall" idea doesn't come from Hawking or Unruh radiation.  No, the firewall idea comes from an attempt to play around with string theory.  Quantum mechanics and general relativity are both very well grounded (incredibly so) in experiment, but string theory has yet to make a single falsifiable prediction (except, one could argue, ones that appear to be wrong, such as predicting too many dimensions).  So trying to figure out what it says about the interior of a black hole seems premature, since that's really untestable -- even if you could jump in a nearby black hole, survive the external radiation and tides, and come close enough to the singularity to really experience whatever quantum gravity effects might be waiting for you, there's no way you could communicate what you found (even or even signal that you died early by hitting this "firewall") to the outside, because you're inside a horizon.

All this is rather academic.  Any stellar-massed black hole you fell into would have enough matter around it that it'd fry you before you got near the horizon and tides strong enough that you'd be torn apart before you got near the singularity.

Edited on December 28, 2012 at 2:08am
I. raptus
Joined
Jun '10
I. raptus

As for the question of how gravity "gets out" of a black hole, the answer is it was there to begin with as the black hole formed.  Gravity is just spacetime curvature in general relativity, and if you have a collapsing star (or whatever) that will eventually form a star, spacetime is curved around it and as it gets more and more dense, the spacetime around is still there and curved more, until finally it falls within its own Schwarzschild radius*.  The gravity is still there because the spacetime is still there, and still curved, even though all you see is a horizon.

* People can quibble with this phrasing since to external observers one can make points about the Schwarzschild t coordinate vs. proper time, but you know what I mean.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover
Joan of Ark La Tex: Very elitist suicidal thoughts. Take care. Thanks for entertaining the rest of us though :)  · 14 minutes ago

Elitist suicidal thoughts ? I read that and applied to my life. It worked .

If I were to buy my wife a new vacuum as a present , it would be suicidal .
(how many words have two 'u' in a row ?)

Joan of Ark La Tex
Joined
Jun '12
Joan of Ark La Tex

flownover

Joan of Ark La Tex: Very elitist suicidal thoughts. Take care. Thanks for entertaining the rest of us though :)  · 14 minutes ago

Elitist suicidal thoughts ? I read that and applied to my life. It worked .

If I were to buy my wife a new vacuum as a present , it would be suicidal .
(how many words have two 'u' in a row ?) · 2 minutes ago

I tend to agree with Craigen. Everything from nature's perspective, about the vacuum, pretty much, sucks. 

Edited on December 28, 2012 at 2:57am
Robert Promm
Joined
Nov '10
Robert Promm

So, it's a hole and it is black.  How deep is the hole?  My understanding is that it has zero depth.  Particles go in and they don't come out but where do they go?  What would you experience if you were at the other side of the black hole (i.e. not the business end).  Or, does a black hole have two business ends or is it spherical and if approached from any direction, that direction is the business end?  So that the event horizon is just some distance from the black hole regardless of the direction?  Do the particles cease to exist or are they simply slowed down to zero vibration so that it only appears that they do not exist?  That would occur at absolute zero.  But nowhere in the universe is it absolute zero today.  My head hurts.

10 cents
Joined
Dec '11
10 cents

My philosophical question are:

  • If someone works in Hollywood would they ever realize it was a black hole they fell in or just complain about poor cell phone coverage before they made the obit page of Variety?
  •  Would the lack of gravity of Hollywood neutralize the black hole?
  • Did anyone notice I added this last question for filler?
Cornelius Julius Sebastian
Joined
Jun '12
Cornelius Julius Sebastian

I'm pretty sure Yvette Mimieux is on the other side, so its probably worth the trip.

yvette-mimieux-black-hole-85

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In