Yesterday, Ambassador Susan Rice went around on the talk shows to distribute an odd talking point:

U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice blanketed the TV airways Sunday to reinforce the Obama administration’s position that the deadly violence at American outposts across the Middle East last week was the result of an anti-Muslim video -- delivering her message on four morning talk shows.   

"What sparked the violence was a very hateful video on the Internet," Rice said on "Fox News Sunday." "It was a reaction to a video that had nothing to do with the United States."

Now, even the folks running Libya aren't so stupid as to advance this line. Heck, they've already rounded up some of the advance plotters for the, um, very very spontaneous attack.When the Obama administration first started spewing this line, I figured they were just trying to buy a few hours of time to get their story straight. But it's been days now, and they keep saying it.All of a sudden I'm terrified that they actually believe this. If so, we're in far worse shape than we may have thought.

Comments:


Albert Arthur
Joined
Oct '11
Albert Arthur

By the way, why was Susan Rice on the Sunday morning shows? Where's Hillary Clinton?!

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

I loved John O'Sullivan's description: "It's like watching a weak swimmer being swept out to sea."

Zachary Ricks
Joined
Jun '12
Zachary Ricks

There's two possibilities here. 

1. They don't believe it. But they know that if they keep saying it, there are those people here who will be comforted and won't have to question their support of the President. 

2. They DO believe it, because their ideology says that no one could possibly hate us now that we've taken a sharp left turn, begun to disempower ourselves, started to acquiesce to their demands, etc.

Either way, it's not a good place to be. Personally, I think it's 2. And the reason I think that is the picture you just posted. They're acquiescing and apologizing and hauling people in because they really believe that by doing so we will show how sensitive and understanding we are, and then peace and love and puppies and unicorn rainbows for everyone! 

They don't understand that they are showing weakness to an implacable enemy, and thus encouraging them to continue. 

To paraphrase Hugh Hewitt, that which pays gets repeated.

Wylee Coyote
Joined
Jul '10
Wylee Coyote

I might, might, believe that the initial attack on the consulate was spontaneous.  Street protests in the Middle East are more intense than the ones we have here, and a country like Libya, fresh from a civil war, is likely awash in lost and stolen military hardware.  Okay, fine.

But the follow-on attack, at the covert diplomatic safehouse nobody was supposed to know about?  Precisely timed to the arrival of the US/Libyan extraction team with the evacuees?  Accurate, well-timed mortar fire on a point target does not just "happen".

Anyone with even a passing familiarity with mortars knows this is bogus.


Joined
Aug '12
At The Rubicon

Out here in Flyover Country, we can tell when someone is an idiot without have to send them for an IQ test. We can also tell that Obama and his entire crew must be hitting the choom pretty hard.

10 cents
Joined
Dec '11
10 cents

Any opposition has to be spontaneous and any bad economic news has to be unexpected when you believe that you think you have solved the diplomatic and economic problems. It is really hard to decide which is worse is the administration fooling us or are they fooling themselves? 

I often wish I could connect Jay Carney or David Axelrod up to a lie detector.  This could make some interviews and press conference a whole lot more interesting.


Joined
Mar '11
Dale in Annapolis

The U.S. is a Chevy Suburban going 110 mph in the fast lane on I-95 with a 2 year-old standing on the front seat playing with the steering wheel while staring at all the pretty lights on the dash.

Frederick Key
Joined
Jul '12
Frederick Key

I was very impressed that the local New York CBS station aired the story along with its very public rebuttal from Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif, saying that it was a planned attack (although perhaps disingenously blaming it on "foreigners, by people who entered the country a few months ago"). An actual crack in the Obama Protection Wall?


Joined
Mar '12
Gloria Hurd

Seriously?!  The Obama administration doesn't believe this.  They do, however, have a low enough regard for the American people  and the press sycophants to believe that we can be made to believe it.  It's the timing that surprises me.  If you need to be terrified, think about what they have planned for an October surprise.  And Mr. Arthur, where's Hillary?  Two ideas come to mind.  She seemed to be truly upset at the loss of Ambassador Stevens.  Perhaps she is distancing herself from the lack of adequate reaction and concern from the White House.  Else, she may be full-force preparing for October.  This WH has more than one shoe left to drop.  Terrified?  That's a time when I assume a posture:  on my knees, and thank God for opening our ears to hear Truth.

Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
Mel Foil
Dale in Annapolis: The U.S. is a Chevy Suburban going 110 mph in the fast lane on I-95 with a 2 year-old standing on the front seat playing with the steering wheel while staring at all the pretty lights on the dash.

The terrorists are the cattle rustlers calling ahead to make sure that further up I-95 all the lanes are full of standing cattle.

The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

To put a little cynicism on it, I don't think it matters what they believe. What they know is that the Romney campaign will say it is not just in response to a stupid internet video, and they can't be seen agreeing with Romney regardless of the cost in American lives. There's an election to win.

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin

I've been assuming that they're trying to keep their story straight. I figured that once they announced they weren't answering any more questions on the grounds that there's an Ongoing Investigation, that was the signal that they needed to shut up all the various state department officials who weren't yet on the same page.

So Susan Rice is just giving the official line, but they most certainly know it's false.

The sad part is, the citizens are buying this official line. That's what terrifies me the most. I thought maybe this would shake the faith of the cult members, but the Obamazoids are still quite devoted to The One. That's frightening.

Patrickb63
Joined
Jun '12
Patrickb63

I never thought I'd see the day when a Libyan president was more truthful than an American president.  I am starting to really worry that the destruction wrought by President Obama and the Democrats is irreversible.  I simply cannot fathom how anyone could support this man.  But I know people who do.

KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville

We're dealing with a classic case of Belief Formation.

Is it that they believe self-serving nonsense? Or do they know it's a lie and they keep repeating it for self-serving gains?

There's another possibility, fairly common among humans:

  • Early on in the process of examining the event, they stumbled upon an explanation that didn't connect all the dots, but connected just enough dots to be passable - and - didn't cast them in a harsh and unflattering light.
  • That's the explanation they hoped was true.
  • They saw the opposition trying to portray them as outright imbeciles and traitors. They knew they weren't traitors but they couldn't admit to being fools.
  • They latched onto the most positive explanation possible, and their belief in it has steadily increased - not because it was any more likely, but because it best defended them against opponents.

When you can't admit to being wrong, you cling to any explanation that makes you look right.

Umbra Fractus
Joined
Nov '10
Umbra Fractus

There must be a Bradley Effect going on here. There is no other possible explanation for half the country apparently thinking these nitwits are doing a good job at anything.

Crow's Nest
Joined
Mar '11
Crow's Nest

“What happened initially was that it was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video. People gathered outside the embassy and then it grew very violent. And those with extremist ties joined the fray and came with heavy weapons, which unfortunately are quite common in post-revolutionary Libya, and that then spun out of control.”

Okay, so, let's pretend we actually by premise (1), that it was spontaneous. When the spontaneous crowd was almost immediately co-opted by extremists with heavier weapons, does this not indicate that the extremists recognize the uses of such chaos? That perhaps before this particular incident they might have considered the consequences of such a situation breaking out, and were immediately able to set in motion a contingency plan to take startling advantage of it? 

Moreover, so, it is "quite common" in post-revolutionary Libya for militias who have refused to disarm to roam about in public--a fact that surprises none of us familiar with failed states where no monopoly on the use of force exists.

In that case, Ambassador, why was it that our diplomat's security detail was so light?

Ross C
Joined
Sep '10
Ross Conatser

Ms. Rice displayed that common bureaucratic skill of making even fantastic and horrible events sound boring. 

I watched her on Fox News Sunday and I could feel all the oxygen being sucked from the room whenever she started to drone on about how normal all this is and how they are just following standard operating procedure by evacuating non-essential personnel.

Nothing to see here.

Paul Dougherty
Joined
Feb '12
Paul Dougherty

KC Mulville:

When you can't admit to being wrong, you cling to any explanation that makes you look right. · 2 hours ago

Spot on!. This, right there! They absolutely believe what they're shoveling. Extreme confidence in the job that they are doing are a hallmark of this administration.

Casey Taylor
Joined
Jun '10
Casey Taylor

Wylee Coyote:  Accurate, well-timed mortar fire on a point target does not just "happen".

Anyone with even a passing familiarity with mortars knows this is bogus.

Please allow me to piggyback on this terrifically astute observation:

RPGs, RPKs, and mortars are expensive, and typically not laying around in quantity, especially in the amounts needed to mount large-scale, sustained attacks on two locations almost simultaneously.  Also, these kinds of things aren't learned from teh intarwebs; Benghazi was done by pros.  The only reason Cairo didn't turn into a fiasco was because (no big secret here) we have a very old, strong, and well-trusted network of sources in Egypt, second only to the Brits.  In Cairo we paid heed and evacuated; in Benghazi we didn't, whether from distrust or hubris, we can't know, because our intel manager was murdered.

Which brings me to the article.  Why is FBI investigating?  Forensics, and maybe an attempt at filling the human intelligence vacuum.  Contra to what Rice says in another interview, there is NO "consensus view of the U.S. intelligence community" other than State is in panic mode, and this CYA is damaging intelligence and diplomatic efforts.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In