George Savage · Jul 2, 2010 at 9:03am

From the congressional loony bin: Watch Speaker Nancy Pelosi boldy go where no one has gone before, asserting that unemployment insurance "creates jobs faster than most any other initiative you can name."

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
etoiledunord

Sounds like a solid endorsement of "trickle-down economics." Not where you want it to trickle from, but trickling none the less.

Cindy
Joined
May '10
Cindy
Ottoman Umpire
Joined
May '10
Ottoman Umpire

The woman hasn't a clue about basic economics, and the scary thing is that she doesn't know she doesn't have a clue. Reminds me of a recent article in the NYT derived from a paper called, "“Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties of Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-assessments.”

The article lead with the true story of a man who thought he could rob banks undisguised because, by covering himself with lemon juice, he was making himself invisible to security cameras. Basically, he was too stupid to know he was stupid.

My advice to the Speaker: stay away from the lemon juice.

Charles Allen
Joined
May '10
Charles Allen

Gee, and here I thought companies hiring people was actually the fastest way to create jobs...

So, by San Fran Nan's reasoning, all those on unemployment at government employees?

Jules
Joined
May '10
Anang

Oh Granny Rictus, you do go on!

Jason Hart
Joined
May '10
Jason Hart

Entitlement spending creates jobs faster than any initiative Nancy Pelosi can name, but that's only because Nancy Pelosi can't name any other government initiatives.

Ottoman Umpire
Joined
May '10
Ottoman Umpire

I've had a nagging guilt for much of the day for simply labeling her as clueless, so let me be a bit more expansive. Yes, UI payments are conceivably a pass-through from the bank accounts of employers to the state to the unemployed to the people they pay for things like groceries and household supplies. And I'll also stipulate that the payments allow the unemployed some level of stability while they, presumably, look for a new job.

My problems with her statement are:

1. UI doesn't so much create jobs as marginally preserve jobs by keeping the revenue of the local grocery store on an even keel. They're not the same.

2. Making it more expensive for employers to hire workers (by adding taxes) is a job killing initiative.

3. Unemployment benefits arguably decrease the urgency with which the jobless look for another job.

Better job creating initiatives would be (a) reducing top marginal income tax rates; (b) lowering the minimum wage, and (c) reducing the supply of illegal workers.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In