So, according to Anthony Shadid, writing for the New York Times, Turkey's democracy is "increasingly vibrant and healthy." He adds that "unlike past politicians, Turkey’s current leaders reflect the people they speak for." 

Nice of him to decide this before Turkey's had a chance to vote. 

For an alternative perspective, here's Anonymous. Shadid may want to ask why this is the author's name. In fact, that's a real person, with a real name, expressing views I am certain to be widely held in Turkey. You've got to ask yourself: If that's an "increasingly vibrant and healthy democracy," why does Anonymous feel it's the better part of wisdom to remain anonymous?

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :


Joined
Jan '11
Margaret Ball
Claire Berlinski, Ed.:Nice of him to decide this before Turkey's had a chance to vote. 

Yeah, well, it might be harder to say it with a straight face after tomorrow's election.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

Or it might be easier---but either way, it would be respectful to for him at least to pretend that he believes elections matter.

Edited on Jun 11, 2011 at 7:56am

Joined
Jan '11
Margaret Ball

Respect? You expect respect for elections from a New York Times reporter? What are they smoking on that cruise of yours?


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In