• Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Paul A. Rahe

Or perhaps they look good for Boehner. Having a bit of heat from the right can be of use as a negotiating tool. Consider the pickle Obama is in. He is losing his base, and the Republicans are ten points ahead of the Democrats with regard to public trust on the economic questions.

Diane Ellis, Ed.
Paul A. Rahe: Or perhaps they look good for Boehner. Having a bit of heat from the right can be of use as a negotiating tool. Consider the pickle Obama is in. He is losing his base, and the Republicans are ten points ahead of the Democrats with regard to public trust on the economic questions. · Jul 26 at 1:31pm

Very good point, Professor.  Glad you have internet connection in Prague...I was just itching to know your take on this situation.

David Williamson
Joined
Mar '11
David Williamson

It's not ideal, but probably the best that can be done until the syphilitic camel takes office on Jan 20, 2013.

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

 Then again, Allen West, Fred Thompson and Paul ZOMG! Ryan have come out for it.  I'd guess (being an expert on these matters, umm) that Boehner loses 20 votes, which is enough for passage, at which point the Reid plan can be safely filibustered.

And then it's on Obama's desk, and we called his bluff of that lame veto threat, with no new taxes and another vote to come in April.

Southern Pessimist
Joined
May '11
Southern Pessimist

Graham Opposes Boehner Plan

By Robert Costa      

"Following the meeting, I walked back to the Senate with Graham and spoke with him about his position. He reiterated his themes from the evening’s discussion, saying he was ready to take up arms with the RSC. So it may be news today, but for the past few weeks, Graham has been a vocal member of the “Cut, Cap, and Balance” camp. His appeal to conservatives seems to be working, too, especially as he looks toward reelection in 2014. When I speak to tea-party darlings in the lower chamber these days, they talk about Graham as an ally."

I don't know what this has to say about the likelihood of Boehner's plan passing, but it destroys Karl Rove's supposition that Christine O'Donnell's win in the Republican primary was a disaster for the party.

Things have changed when Lindsay Graham feels like he needs to be to the right of Paul Ryan or Allen West.

Edited on Jul 26, 2011 at 2:49pm
Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

Southern Pessimist

 

Things have changed when Lindsay Graham feels like he needs to be to the right of Paul Ryan or Allen West. 

Lindsay Graham strikes me as one of the most nearly worthless members of the Republican Senate Caucus.  That he occasionally feels enough pressure to do something right is no reason to believe that he can ever learn to do the right thing unprompted.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque
Paul A. Rahe: Or perhaps they look good for Boehner. Having a bit of heat from the right can be of use as a negotiating tool. Consider the pickle Obama is in. He is losing his base, and the Republicans are ten points ahead of the Democrats with regard to public trust on the economic questions. · Jul 26 at 1:31pm

Agreed. Carping from the Right can be a good thing if Boehner uses it to justify why he can't move any further from the Right's position.  However, it's a bad thing if Boehner uses it to justify cutting a mushy deal to get Democrat votes to replace the carpers' votes.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

 The headline on this post reminds me of the coffee cup/T-shirt/Post-It Note slogan:

"Today's Just Not Your Day.  Tomorrow Doesn't Look Good Either."


Joined
Apr '11
Viator

 

Just a reminder. The National Debt has continued to increase an average of $3.82 billion per day since September 28, 2007!

 

The so called cuts in the Boehner proposal amount to $120 billion annually and many of them are Easter Bunny cuts. You will see these cuts the same time as you see the Easter Bunny.

 

$3.82 billion a day X 365 days in a year = $1,394.30 billion we are currently borrowing each year. So after all the smoke and mirrors we will still, in the very best case, be borrowing $1,274.30 billion dollars a year.


Joined
Apr '11
Viator

Then there is this. I caught Senator Rand Paul talking on the radio this morning and he pointed out an important fact. We all must remember that any cuts mentioned by the President or congressional leaders are taken from a baseline budget. Now we plain speaking folks think a cut is a cut. You cut $1.20 from an amount and you end up with $1.20 less, right?  Not in Washington, DC. The baseline budget being used in Washington, DC as we speak calls for +$10 trillion increase over ten years. So the if the Boehner plan, for instance, calls for $1.2 trillion in cuts what we are actually talking about is cutting $1.2 trillion from a $10 trillion increase. Or, putting it another way, they are cutting a $10 trillion increase to a $8.8 trillion increase. So a $1.2 trillion cut is actually a $8.8 trillion increase.
http://paul.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=258

 


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In