I sometimes wonder whether the Savior's remark that, "...the poor shall be with ye always," was actually made at a truck stop.  As a Christian, I celebrate this season when the Word became flesh and also observe that, judging from the above quote, in addition to being the Prince of Peace, Christ is also the undisputed King of Understatement.

Pandhandlers are an almost daily fact of life for an over the road trucker.  I don't know if they think we are loaded with cash, or if maybe it's the "captive audience" nature of truck stops (we can only park and rest in certain places).  But after maneuvering The Beast backwards into a parking spot, I'll often look up and see them approaching, eyes darting about, maybe with a sachel of "gold" chains they're ready to sell, or a forlorn look that cues the violins for the sob story I'm about to hear.  I like to think I've achieved a certain level of discernment and can distinguish the truly needy from the thoroughly seedy, but I'm not always sure. 

Over at the Washington Post today, Petula Dvořák discusses the phenomenon in the DC area, and her article got me to thinking. Is there some "one size fits all" response to panhandlers here that doesn't entail extreme indifference or gullibility? Some people offer to buy a meal for a person who claims to be hungry.  I like that approach, but with the schedules I run, I often times don't have time to eat lunch myself, let alone watch someone else eat.  I find that I will sometimes hand over a few bucks out of simple expediency rather than debate with the panhandler, and later with my own conscience.  At other times, I've become annoyed (especially with the jewelry salesmen), even to the point of offering once to introduce the merchandise to the digestive processes of a particularly tenacious antagonist. 

The words, "I was hungry and ye fed me, I was naked and ye clothed me," come back to my mind.  Especially at this time of year, as the cold sets in. I have noticed a fortunate trend where the truck stop panhandlers have migrated south, so that their ranks swell in Florida but dwindle in Michigan, where I am today. 

But the images remain. The mass of blankets on the concrete in Alabama, where a young man slept a couple of weeks ago. The veteran in Denver sleeping outside the truck stop, back in 2006, who lost his ka-bar and wanted a few bucks for another to defend himself from hoodlums.  The lady with mascara running down her face, who had tried to surprise her husband at a truck stop only to find him in the sleeper with another woman and now just wanted enough money to put some gas in her car and go home.  The young troop who had lost his bank card and needed gas to get his young family to his next duty station.  All of these people I helped, but there are many that I didn't.  It's not always an easy call, and it's often made more difficult by my own limitations of time, judgement, and resources.  Tis the season, right?

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

Rob Long is too proud to beg.  But on the National Review cruise, after he appeared on stage without wearing socks, folks passed a basket around. 

Songwriter
Joined
Aug '10
Songwriter

Wonderful post, Dave. I bet a lot of us struggle to find the balance between being kind and being a chump. In the end, I'd rather err to the "kind" side. But, I fear I fall short most of the time.

Dave Roy
Joined
Oct '10
David Roy

It's very hard to decide just who to give to, especially in a panhandler's paradise like Vancouver, BC. There are certain times it's obvious that the person needs help, but even if you're thinking of giving something to the one person, you're very likely to hit upon three or four more if you're walking around downtown, even if it's a short journey.

Where does it stop?

Sometimes indifference is the only thing you can practice, because the alternative of giving to everybody who most likely needs it is too much.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

I with you, Dave.  I feel like I've been scammed more often than I've been of real service.  Like by the 30-something guy who accosted me on my way out of the local adoration chapel (!) telling me he was frantic with worry because his mother was in the hospital a half hour away and his car had broken down.  I gave him $30 dollars, but felt horrible about it afterwards.  Why hadn't I instead offered to drive him to his mother? (But could I have risked being alone in the car with a drug-addled nutcase?)  or told him to explain his dilemma to the priests in the rectory?  Was I just taking the easy route?  Being the rich lady dispensing largesse?

But then I think, too, of saints like Dorothy Day and her utter commitment to "the undeserving poor" who chronically took advantage of her, and yet, were converted in gigantic numbers by her self-oblating witness...

It's a true dilemma.  All I can say is, Lead, Kindly Light.

Talleyrand
Joined
May '10
David Kube

 It is rather hard reconciling Christian compassion with Rand's self-interest (I am not trying to be a smartass here).  Sometimes I just give and leave it up to G-d to decide who the deserving poor actually are. Other times my heart is hardened and stony, and I just rush past.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs
David Kube:  It is rather hard reconciling Christian compassion with Rand's self-interest (I am not trying to be a smartass here).  · Nov 30 at 8:51am

True, David.  They are not reconcilable.  

Midget Faded Rattlesnake
Joined
Aug '10
Midget Faded Rattlesnake

In my city, panhandlers are a big problem -- and I'm sure most of them are crooks, or at least people who'd be better off without being rewarded for panhandling.

I happen to know that the shelters and soup-kitchens of our city are usually underbooked.

But my reaction to them is all over the map -- perhaps it's just at the whim of my mood or digestion. If I have a non-money item that could be useful to them and would cost me little to replace, like food or a public transportation card, I often offer it. When all I've got is cash, I try very hard for indifference, but I don't always make it... and then I feel like a sucker (which I probably am) afterward. The amount I give when I do succumb is all over the map, too.

I try to tell myself that by resisting the temptation to be a sucker for panhandlers, I'll have more to put in the Salvation Army pots. Usually that works.

Edited on Nov 30, 2010 at 9:38am
Dave Carter

Katievs, you've really highlighted a huge issue, where the desire to help crosses with the desire not to be a story on the evening news, as in, "local good samaritan assaulted." It's not an easy balance, and who wants to help fund a drug addiction, etc? Ultimately I go with my gut which, for some reason, is connected to my conscience.

Dave Carter

David, can Christian compassion and Randian self interest be reconciled with the observation that both approaches recognize the right of the individual to dispense of his property as he sees fit, and that it may be an act of self interest to indulge one's conscience by helping another person? It's an act of free will, right? Or should I step away from the caffeine?

Midget Faded Rattlesnake
Joined
Aug '10
Midget Faded Rattlesnake
Dave Carter: David, can Christian compassion and Randian self interest be reconciled with the observation that both approaches recognize the right of the individual to dispense of his property as he sees fit, and that it may be an act of self interest to indulge one's conscience by helping another person? It's an act of free will, right? Or should I step away from the caffeine? 

No need to step away from the caffeine, sir. Your supposition seems perfectly sound to me.

Dave Carter

Thanks, MFR. I'm going back for a refill now.

Talleyrand
Joined
May '10
David Kube

 Not sure about reconciliation/caffeine Dave, but I do have a great Yiddish joke :

Two beggars are sitting side by side on a street in Rome.
One has a cross in front of him;
the other one the Star of David.
Many people go by and look at both beggars,
but only put money into the hat of the beggar
sitting behind the cross.

A priest comes by, stops and watches  people giving money to the beggar behind the cross, but none give to the beggar behind the Star of David.

Finally, the priest goes over to the beggar behind
the Star of David and says,

"My poor fellow, don't you understand?
This is a Catholic country, this city is the seat of Catholicism.
People aren't going to give you money if you sit there
with a Star_of_David in front of you, especially when
you're sitting beside a beggar who has a cross.
In fact, they would probably give to him just out of spite."

 The beggar behind the 'Star_of_David' listened to the priest,
turned to the other beggar with the cross and said:

"Moishe, look who's trying to teach the
Goldstein brothers about marketing.

Edited on Nov 30, 2010 at 9:23am
Midget Faded Rattlesnake
Joined
Aug '10
Midget Faded Rattlesnake

As a matter of fact, when I do give in to panhandlers, I often suspect myself of ultimately harming them for the sake of my own self-indulgence.

It is not good to fuel people's addictions and evil habits, to encourage them to stand in busy intersections and highway ramps, where they not only endanger themselves, but the drivers who might accidentally hit them.

Yet there's a psychic reward for that "cheap compassion" -- for giving them what they want, even though it's probably bad for them. When I indulge in giving to panhandlers, I'm not only indulging them, but more importantly, myself.

Tell me, what is moral about encouraging a bad situation simply to make myself feel good?

But I still do it from time to time.

Dave Carter

Now THAT was funny!

Diane Ellis, Ed.

When someone on the street tells me they're hungry, I recall the words of the Lord that you quoted above, Dave, and I am prevented from continuing on my way until that hungry person is fed.  Once, it so happened that my hunger coincided with a homeless youth's so we ate at a local pizzeria together.  Over lunch, I heard his life's story and had the opportunity to offer a few words of encouragement.  I also invited him to a nearby church where I knew he'd be welcome.  Considering the big picture, little gestures like these don't matter much.  At the end of the day, the fellow I fed was still homeless and would be returning to his sleeping bag under the freeway overpass.  But I like to think that extending kindness and compassion to those in need does matter in some cosmic sense.

Dave Carter

MFR, your question is the crux of what I wrestle with in these parking lots. Not that I don't mind confronting the obvious looters, ...but of the others I keep wondering about the possibility that they really are in need. I remember once, I was in the car waiting on The Missus to buy something at the store. I had to given her my cash. Up walks an older gentleman wearing a veteran's cap, and he shows me a little card that said he was deaf and dumb, and would like to sell me some little trinkets he had made to support himself. And didn't have a dime. I explained this to him, while of course wearing my own veterans cap. He looked so hurt, ...deeply hurt that another vet turned him away. I will never forget that look. Is it indulgence? Yes. But that doesn't make it always wrong.

Robert McKay
Joined
Oct '10
ElevenX

 I wonder how many of the homeless claiming to be veterans really are veterans. It's a damned shame people lie about it but I know they do. When driving to work I also frequently see people holding signs saying "disabled veteran" and wonder to myself how disabled can they be if they stand on their own two feet all day holding a sign with their obviously functional two hands?

The liars and con artists among them mean that I won't ever again give to a panhandler on the street. Salvation Army? Yes. Homeless shelter? Definitely. Soup kitchen? Absolutely. Man on the street? No, nay, never.

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

I must be in the minority Here. I never give to vagrants and I never feel guilty for not doing so. I pay taxes and give to select organizations.

There are so many government programs and so many charities Here in America that to be "homeless" and/or hungry is a choice.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

Midget Faded Rattlesnake: As a matter of fact, when I do give in to panhandlers, I often suspect myself of ultimately harming them for the sake of my own self-indulgence.

It is not good to fuel people's addictions and evil habits, to encourage them to stand in busy intersections and highway ramps, where they not only endanger themselves, but the drivers who might accidentally hit them.

Yet there's a psychic reward for that "cheap compassion" -- for giving them what they want, even though it's probably bad for them. When I indulge in giving to panhandlers, I'm not only indulging them, but more importantly, myself.

Tell me, what is moral about encouraging a bad situation simply to make myself feel good?

But I still do it from time to time. · Nov 30 at 9:23am

You've nailed the problem exactly, MFR.  

But indifference is no solution for the Christian conscience.  They are human beings and so are we. 

Tripedis Canis
Joined
Jul '10
Tripedis Canis

Rule of thumb: If they've got a story that's not too pat, they're probably worth helping. Dave's examples of folks who have encountered a bad moment in their lives, and need help to get past it, would pass. A guy in a veteran's cap who'll tell you when and where he served would also be alright, more often than not. People who answer questions with, "Man, I just need to eat!" are probably going to get a brush-off from me.

Not to say that a slick con artist couldn't come up with a decent story. But if it's good enough, I'll pay for the entertainment value. It ain't charity, then.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In