C.J. Box · August 31, 2012 at 1:36am

Several weeks ago, while on an annual fly-fishing trip with several other authors (we were in Idaho this time), we engaged in a late-night alcohol-fueled discussion about politics.  Being the only right-of-center guy in our group -- the others hail from right and left coasts -- it was three against one, just the way I like it (I'm kidding, but I held my own).

As the argument grew louder and more heated -- but never personal or vicious which is why we remain friends -- they went on about how much they liked and admired Obama and despised the evil Mormon wife-killer and tax-cheat Romney, I began to note a "tell" in their arguments that I've noticed before and which became more pronounced as the night went on. 

One of them would say something like, "I feel Obama has done the best he could given the hand he was dealt..."

Or, "I feel like the super-rich should pay more in taxes..."

I would respond by saying, "I think it's wrong to try to make our country more like Europe..."

Or, "I think a thirty-five percent tax rate is just too high if we want the economy to grow..."

Blah-blah-blah. You know the arguments.  But what I noted was the tell:  Lefties feel and Righties think.  Obviously, this is not news.  The left is emotion-based and the right is logic-based.  Both sides are pretty sure they're on the correct side. 

Words mean things, and the choice of words reveals quite a lot.  When someone starts a statement by saying, "I feel..." I prepare myself for a bowl full of mush.  But when someone says, "I think..." I listen.  I may disagree, but I listen.

Sometimes, I hear someone right-of-center say, "I feel..." --with all due respect to Mr. Long on the Ricochet podcast, for example --and it throws me off.    I chalk it up to being surrounded by lefties and hearing it so much that it bleeds into common language. 

By beginning a sentence with "I feel..." the person speaking has made a choice to frame the statement in emotion, not logic -- unless, of course, the statement is about feelings ("I feel kind of ashamed for calling out Mr. Long on his own website.")  Which is okay.

What do you think?  Is "I think..." vs. "I feel..." the most obvious "tell" in the language when it comes to determining someone's political viewpoint?

Comments:


flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

CJ

How many card games have been replaced by this game ?

Whatever happened to the mix of money , bluff , and skill that came with a perfectly fine metric ?

I think it' s a bad trade .

I feel it's a generational narcissism .

And my boomer group }) is the crummiest generation .

Hit me-

Edited on August 31, 2012 at 1:50am
wilber forge
Joined
Oct '10
wilber forge

The  "I" reference is the most commonly used item in the verbal exchange between folks. Converse without it's use and see what happens.

Brady Kiel
Joined
May '10
Brady Kiel

I see this a lot when I discuss issues with folks.  I witnessed it very acutely here in Wisconsin in the past year and a half (I'm a public schoolteacher).  I had a number of run-ins (unsolicited) with some of the "feelings" crowd.  Feelings+Righteous Indignation=volatile mix.  The very few who quietly sought me out to for discussion using the "think" method produced much longer discussions and, at least, respectful agree-to-disagree conclusions.  This will always be the case.

LowcountryJoe
Joined
Jan '11
LowcountryJoe

When arguing with the Left (and even some on the Right), take some pages from Arthur C. Brooks -- make the moral case for liberty.  

And those 'feelings' by your Lefty ideological opponent -- those ones about how they want to help the disadvantaged should be met with, "Why don't you help them, privately, then?"  When they counter that not enough people would be willing to go along with it voluntarily, ask them, "Why do you feel this way...certainly there are enough; look how many people talk as you do."  

They'll come up with something else.  When they do, tell them that giving discriminately would create the right conditions/incentives for those who get assistance to have their acts cleaned-up.  And that more cleaned-up acts and better character being demonstrated is a good thing, right?  

At every turn, an argument backed by first principles should trump the one by those who'd push for coercion.  And if there must be some amount of coercion involved, it's best to be at the local level of government as possible.  Shouldn't matter how outnumbered one is if you play it 'Right' => !!!

Basil Fawlty
Joined
Mar '11
Basil Fawlty

A former boss used to red-pencil any use of "I feel" in my writing.  I'm grateful. 

Peter Robinson

'Sometimes, I hear someone right-of-center say, "I feel..." --with all due respect to Mr. Long on the Ricochet podcast, for example --and it throws me off.'

Yes, C.J., when it comes to Brother Rob, we all have to exercise a special patience.

(You are one engaging writer, btw.)

SMG
Joined
Aug '11
SMG

In the case of a lefty co-worker (an electrical engineer, normally not the "feel" type) it bleeds into technical discussions too, where it belongs even less.  When talking about data people, including him, spent a lot of time (and sweat) taking: "Regardless of what this [the data] shows, I feel like..."

It may just be some trick of upbringing, region, or influential media, but I think there's a link between "I feel" and an unwillingness to consider the facts.  


Joined
May '11
Larry3435

I agree about I think, and I feel, but what about "I'm struck"?  As in:

"I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart.  There are a lot of smart people out there.  It must be because I worked harder than everybody else.  Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there."

This, of course, is the missing "context" of Obama's "you didn't build that" comment.   And I think the phrase "I'm struck" means "I'm contemptutous."  It means "You didn't get there because you're smart or because you worked hard.  Everybody does those things.  You got there because you were lucky.  And I feel... envy.  Because you don't deserve success and I do."  That's what it's all about.  That's the main "feeling" they're not thinking about.  Envy, pure and simple.

Or, maybe they just feel that being compassionate with other people's money makes them morally superior.  But I don't think so.


Joined
Apr '11
jt

The nice thing about "I feel..." is that it's irrefutable. Who's to say how you feel?

When someone says "I feel employers should pay for birth control" and you try to make a reasoned case against it the response is likely some form of "Unlike you, I'm a kind and compassionate person who cares about women's health." It's difficult to get anywhere with this.

Paul Erickson
Joined
May '11
Paul Erickson

"I feel" is taught and encouraged in interpersonal relationships. Maybe that's why it is favored by people on the left. I picked it up at Marriage Encounter back in the early 80s.  It works in that context and it has it's place. 

Just because someone uses that phrase, it does not necessarily mean that what follows is non-logical, weakly reasoned or wrong.


Joined
May '11
Larry3435

Paul Erickson:

"I feel" is taught and encouraged in interpersonal relationships. Maybe that's why it is favored by people on the left. I picked it up at Marriage Encounter back in the early 80s.  It works in that context and it has it's place. 

Just because someone uses that phrase, it does not necessarily mean that what follows is non-logical, weakly reasoned or wrong. · 2 minutes ago

No, not necessarily.  But as some great but unintentional New England philosopher once said, "jes so happens."

C.J. Box
jt: The nice thing about "I feel..." is that it's irrefutable. Who's to say how you feel?

Excellent point.  How can someone's feelings possibly be "wrong."

C.J. Box
Peter Robinson:  (You are one engaging writer, btw.) · 43 minutes ago

Thank you so much, Mr. Robinson.  That means a lot to me coming from you.

C.J. Box

SMG:

It may just be some trick of upbringing, region, or influential media, but I think there's a link between "I feel" and an unwillingness to consider the facts.   · 37 minutes ago

Another brilliant point.  I feel you Ricochet members are smart as whips.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

I'm struck by the cleaving tautology of .......zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

typical navel gazing

let's get back to the argument , preferably the game . one card~

C.J. Box

flownover: I'm struck by the cleaving tautology of .......zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

typical navel gazing

let's get back to the argument , preferably the game . one card~ · 6 minutes ago

Color me baffled.

PracticalMary
Joined
Nov '11
PracticalMary

C.J. Box

jt: The nice thing about "I feel..." is that it's irrefutable. Who's to say how you feel?

Excellent point.  How can someone's feelings possibly be "wrong." · 1 hour ago

That is the whole point: feelings can be wrong. Not that the feeling isn't real, but the feeling can be based on an incorrect assumption, an inappropriate reaction (feeling) to something, etc. Ask Dennis Prager, for instance.

Rob Long

Peter Robinson: 'Sometimes, I hear someone right-of-center say, "I feel..." --with all due respect to Mr. Long on the Ricochet podcast, for example --and it throws me off.'

Yes, C.J., when it comes to Brother Rob, we all have to exercise a special patience.

(You are one engaging writer, btw.) · 3 hours ago

I think I feel okay about this.

Sumomitch
Joined
Mar '12
Robert Mitchell

The "feeling" thing paved the way to the ending every sentence with a question thing. Either way, disagreements are foreclosed. This is just my take, you know? E Pluribus Mushum.

Brian Kennedy
Joined
Jun '12
Brian Kennedy

I go with "I believe" myself.  That way, if I believe it because it is a value argument I can argue about the values (which are often feeling based), if it is a factual dispute I can then argue about the facts which inform my opinions.  Since many of the arguments I make have elements of both think and feel, it allows me to make them all.

Edited on August 31, 2012 at 7:09am

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In