shutterstock_110545514

I know that's true on most days, but today is particularly noteworthy. Yesterday was a horrible day for President Obama's foreign policy. On the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, two of our embassies were attacked, our Ambassador to Libya was murdered and three other men died. The Ambassador's body was reportedly mishandled in the streets.

And while Americans cringe over the multiple apology-lines to the terrorists issued by President Obama, Hillary Clinton and the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, the media are focused like a laser on ... Mitt Romney.

Mitt Romney condemned the attacks and the weak sauce response to them and the media decided, following the Obama campaign's lead, that this was very bad. Romney held a press conference and all of the questions were about the timing of Romney's comments last night. Who cares? I mean, who (other than Obama campaign operatives who are trying to change the story as quickly as possible and treat all Romney criticism as illegitimate) cares?

The media seem curiously incurious about how these attacks were allowed to happen, what the U.S. security policy was in the days leading up to the anniversary of the terrorist attacks, why the Obama administration insists on apologizing for our Constitutional rights to free speech and freedom of religious expression, or anything else. They're just completely grafted on to the Obama campaign.

This may have all the effect of yelling at a tornado to stop, but no one should wonder why the media has lost so much favor over the years.

Image of media and Obama campaign clutching each other via Shutterstock.

Comments:


katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

Did a mob of Islamists parade the Ambassador's body through the streets, or did concerned, America-loving Libyans "carry" his body to the hospital?

Here's the horrible thing: We can't trust either the White House or the media to tell us the truth about it.

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

Mollie:  I posted this question over on the Member Feed, but it seems directly relevant to the issues you raise in this post:

I know that the facts are still confused.  Nonetheless, I’ve never read anything about the role of American security personnel during the killings in Benghazi.  Were they even there (if not, why not)? Were they ordered to stand-down?  Who gave the order?

 I just read a news report that fifty Marines are being sent to Benghazi, but nothing about what assets are being reinforced.  Please tell me the government was not so stupid that it had no security in Libya.

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin

I wonder if anyone in the media will remember that this is the Libya that Obama created. Ordering an attack on the Khaddafi regime (without consent of Congress), putting this new regime in place -- this is Obama's Libya. His alone.

What are the odds on how long before he blames someone else?

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole
DrewInWisconsin: I wonder if anyone in the media will remember thatthis is the Libya that Obama created. Ordering an attack on the Khaddafi regime (without consent of Congress), putting this new regime in place -- this is Obama's Libya.His alone.

I would disagree.  The Republican Congress in their silent consent to his actions, giving up their duty to check the President, or to even enforce the law, or to even do any simple oversight, are complicit in this.

This was a joint effort.  Obama took the lead, the Republicans in Congress silently consented.

This whole divided government-checks and balances thing only works of the branches actually check one another.

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole
DrewInWisconsin: I wonder if anyone in the media will remember thatthis is the Libya that Obama created. Ordering an attack on the Khaddafi regime (without consent of Congress), putting this new regime in place -- this is Obama's Libya.His alone.

I would disagree.  The Republican Congress in their silent consent to his actions, giving up their duty to check the President, or to even enforce the law, or to even do any simple oversight, are complicit in this.

This was a joint effort.  Obama took the lead, the Republicans in Congress silently consented.

This whole divided government-checks and balances thing only works of the branches actually check one another.

Bereket Kelile
Joined
Oct '10
bereket kelile

I was listening to NPR's coverage this morning (I know, I know) and that's all they talked about after the President's remarks.  They even were saying that they gave Romney many chances "to retreat" back to a more "reticent" position but they're not backing down. I wonder if the media is trying to use this to help bolster Obama. You know they hated the fact that we had to rally to a GOP President on 9/11 and they'd like to have their own version of a crisis in which we all fall in line behind Obama and give him a second term. I'm not trying to diminish the tragedy of the events but the guys on NPR were talking it up like it was a major, devastating attack when it doesn't even compare with the 1979 incident in the Tehran embassy. 


Joined
Apr '11
wmartin

The MSM version will probably stick and create a "rally 'round" effect for Obama, as Bereket Kelile states above. Obama's incompetence helped to create this entire situation, bit somehow we are the ones who will lose the news cycle.


Joined
Mar '11
emg

How is it that on the Anniversary of 9/11 Security at all of our overseas embassies wasn't on the highest alert? For goodness sake, here in America on Tax Day every federal building is on high alert. The last 24 hours have shown how dangerous our own State Department is: political correctness, moral equivalence and blame America first are higher priorities than the physical safety of our citizens/representatives. It's not as if either Egypt or Libya have been stable at any point in 2012 - they are both active war zones yet it seems as if the security in place would be more appropriate for an embassy in Iceland or Bermuda. The early "appologies" out of the state dept. and Secretary Clinton's statement clearly reflect the actual thinking in the department. Distressing indeed.

Hartmann von Aue
Joined
Aug '12
Hartmann von Aue

The Democrats have long since been the party of Wormtongue. Not a surprise, though it is an outrage.


Joined
Jun '12
with me where I am

For all the guff Romney is taking from the media for his response, I hope he nails this one in the debates. It should be relatively simple for him to say something that strikes the audience as reasonable in regards to this rather obvious Administration failure.


Joined
Aug '11
David Odell

This may be a case of MSM overreach. What American, hearing of this outrage, isn't going to feel that this is a Jimmy Carter moment being desperately spun by all the forces of government and media?

The success of Dinesh D'Souza's film is evidence that all in not as it seems to the managers of public opinion.

ConservativeWanderer
Joined
Jun '12
ConservativeWanderer
David Odell: This may be a case of MSM overreach. What American, hearing of this outrage, isn't going to feel that this is a Jimmy Carter moment being desperately spun by all the forces of government and media? · 0 minutes ago

Exactly.

Most people realize that the leftymedia is in the tank for Obama, so this will look like the leftymedia is rushing to cover up their Emperor's nakedness.

genferei
Joined
Oct '10
genferei

Why is a Republican holding a press conference with the MSM? How can it possibly help? MSM delenda est.

Sweezle
Joined
Feb '12
Sweezle

Sadly there are photos online of the thugs displaying their hatefulness and disrespect toward the body of the Ambassador. And their glee at destroying the American Embassy. I expect the MSM to continue to ignore the American murders,  continue to cover-up for Obama and the only American standing up and saying this is NOT okay is Romney. And we are criticizing him at Ricochet? Really???

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin
genferei: Why is a Republican holding a press conference with the MSM?

Because the President won't? ; )

ConservativeWanderer
Joined
Jun '12
ConservativeWanderer
Sweezle: ... the only American standing up and saying this is NOT okay is Romney. And we are criticizing him at Ricochet? Really??? · 11 minutes ago

Because Romney isn't the Promised Libertarian Secular Savior, so he must be cut down.

10 cents
Joined
Dec '11
10 cents

My solution is declare Libya a Swing State with 40 electoral votes with a world famous golf course to get this White House to move.

Andrew Barrett
Joined
Mar '11
Andrew Barrett

I caught Romney's presser "live," and I thought he was great.  He handled the unfair questions he received flawlessly.  In fact, his performance was...what is that word I am looking for...um......tip of my tongue...got it!...presidential.

Erik Larsen
Joined
Jan '11
Erik Larsen

President Obama picked the wrong week to skip intelligence briefing meetings

Stephen Kruiser
Joined
Feb '12
Stephen Kruiser

Stunningly, OFA and the MSM have found an even lazier approach than "Blame Bush".


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In