Steve Manacek · Aug 2, 2010 at 9:11am

I never thought I'd be able to say this, and I'm sure it will never happen again, but I was actually inspired last week by John Kerry. The inspiration -- when the Democrats, reverting to the "class warfare" they always fall back on when in trouble, propose extending the Bush tax cuts for people making less than X, but letting them expire for "the rich," Republicans should propose extending them for everyone except those making more than $2 million a year or having a net worth greater than $25 million, who would fall into a new 60% tax bracket. Anyone among this group owning a yacht or private jet valued at more than $1 million would be bumped into a 65% bracket. The tag line could be something along the lines of: "You want to tax the rich? Tax the rich."

I can hear the howls from the low-tax purists already, but c'mon -- there's no chance in Hades this would ever happen (the Dems aren't going to risk losing all those campaign contributions from the 10 wealthiest zip codes that flow so disproportionately to them), and wouldn't it be fun to watch the Kerrys and Soroses and Gores and Rockefellers and Kohls and Feinsteins and all those people explaining why this was a bad idea?

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Duane Oyen
Joined
May '10
Duane Oyen

I like it. Just like the luxury tax that eliminated the New England boat building industry. The key is making it impossible to shelter anything- no Soros or Teresa Heinz Kerry Foundations. Nothing for Bill Gates' dad to do.

Jason Hart
Joined
May '10
Jason Hart

That would be hilarious, but also something like staring back at Dirty Harry's .45: some percentage of Democrats actually believe their class warfare garbage - do you feel lucky, America?

It'd be a great source of wealthy leftist quotes for Breitbart to play and the "mainstream" news networks to ignore, too!

Tom Lindholtz
Joined
May '10
Tom Lindholtz

I love it!!! Duane is right. The key is making it loophole proof. And while they're at it, why not a wealth tax on anyone with a total net worth above, what, $5M? And that could include an asset tax on foundations, too. How about 75%? Let's see if they really believe what they spout in their populist harangues.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In