Fill in the blank and explain.

Comments:


Percival
Joined
Mar '11
Percival

Fill in the blank questions.  Because I always do better on multiple choice.

I like thelonious' answer of "entrenched interests" better than "crony capitalism," which was my first response.   "Rent seekers" works too.

Colin B Lane
Joined
Jun '11
Colin B Lane

~Paules: Barrack Hussein Obama . . .  ding! ding! ding!   

Alex, I'll take Politically Correct Speech for a hundred please.   · 50 minutes ago

Esther: The current WH occupant;  followed by judges that legislate from the left without regard to the Constitution, or the people's will. · 45 minutes ago

I think we make a mistake when we lay all of the problems at the feet of the current occupant of the White House. He is a man of the Left, but it is Leftism that is killing us. We have to begin systematically removing it root and branch from the institutions I mentioned above. Simply voting President Obama out of office will not change the ugliness of these institutions.


Joined
May '11
Tom Roberts

The size of the Federal government.

Some people here are giving examples of declines in individual responsibility and character, and they have a point, but I'd suggest that huge government programmes are the cause rather than a symptom.

I don't think human nature has changed, or ever will change. If you tell people they can have something at someone else's expense they'll take it, and adjust their own behaviour accordingly.

James Delingpole

Money-printing by the Federal Reserve. All your other problems spring from this: it enables the continual expansion of government (even under notionally conservative administrations) and stokes burgeoning welfare/entitlement culture.

Capt. Aubrey
Joined
Sep '10
Capt. Aubrey

The biggest problem is the legal/regulatory state that fosters disrespect for law and produces a mindset that legality is what you can get away with if you payoff the right crowd and tie the system up. The second biggest is the desire for communitarian social justice.

Keith Preston
Joined
May '10
Keith Preston

Political courage when the nation needs leadership. (Paul Ryan, I'm looking at you)

Shane McGuire
Joined
Feb '12
Shane McGuire

Decline in faith and responsibility----they're intertwined, I think.

Snow Bird
Joined
Feb '11
Snow Bird

Most of the above.

Severely Ltd.
Joined
Oct '10
Severely Ltd.
Keith Preston: Political courage when the nation needs leadership. (Paul Ryan, I'm looking at you) · 8 minutes ago

Not the greatest single problem in my estimation, but certainly high enough in the running to be mentioned.

Austin Murrey
Joined
Nov '11
Austin Murrey

A sense of entitlement.

Too many people think they are due something for being themselves: money, success, a family, fame, etc.  Not enough people realize they have to earn those things.

LowcountryJoe
Joined
Jan '11
LowcountryJoe

Too many people disdain market outcomes and have no stomach to appreciate individual liberty [liberty; with standard qualifiers such as this one].


Joined
Apr '11
John Mason

Conscious Stupidity

One example would be the President's most recent energy speech.


Joined
Nov '11
Sandy

All regimes, including ours, exist in a state of some tension.  In our regime, I would argue, that tension is between liberty and equality.  This tension works if the two are in balance.   Currently equality has largely been denigrated to "equality of outcome," and so liberty is in danger of being extinguished.  


Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire

The notion that one has an implicit or explicit right to a portion of someone else's life.

 That is the root of all social, economic and political sins.

Edited on February 28, 2012 at 6:33pm
Valiuth
Joined
Apr '11
Valiuth

The biggest problem in America is a plateauing of economic growth and job creation.  

We are going down the route of slow growth and high unemployment of Japan and Europe...this will only push people to want more Government help and it will mean the government can never raise the money to provide it . If we had the Economic growth of the 50 and 60 or even 80's we would be in better shape...I don't know any government program can actually give us that kind of economic growth again. 


Joined
Feb '12
maureen dirienzo

The loss of individual freedom vs an all powerful, smothering state.  People don't even realize they have individual freedoms under the Constitution any more.   The idea that the state can tell them what light bulbs they can have is perfectly reasonable to some people.   There's no concept that they can push back on anything the state dictates. 


Joined
Dec '11
Tony Hopkins

Personal Responsibilty -- The individual is not responsible for themselves or their family anymore.  Government, parents, neighbors, churches and the rich should take care of us seems to be the mantra of the day.  Tom Roberts is correct that this is aided and abetted by the size of Federal Government. 

If every person was responsible for putting food on the table and their own future, would we need welfare, medicaid, medicare, social security, AFDC and the multitude of other programs at the same level they are now or projected to be in the future.

This would kick start growth and many other positive changes in my opinion.

Dramman
Joined
Aug '11
Dramman

The Niggling - Its on the right, the left, business, and government. Everyone is convinced that a "perfect" society can be achieved by a list of little economic incentives which in the end only make life more annoying and coarse. Want to save on jet fuel? Make people pay for the privilege of eating airline food. Want people to use canvas grocery bags? Charge them a nickle a bag. Want to use less energy? Make people pay 50 cents more a light bulb for a curly one. Water? Lower-flow toilets. People getting lost? Mandatory new "readable" signs. Costly to clean toilets? No public restroom. Offended by the smell of smoke in the park? No smoking in public areas. The list goes on...

Tom Lindholtz
Joined
May '10
Tom Lindholtz

Progressivism/Liberalism. Progress is Providence without God. That is, it is a theory that everything has always perpetually gone right by accident. It is a sort of atheistic optimism, based on an everlasting coincidence far more miraculous than a miracle.   ... Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936)

JustinC
Joined
Feb '11
JustinC

Moral Relativism - because when we all make our own rules, and define our own "truth", anything goes.  And it does


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In