Jack Dunphy · April 12, 2012 at 2:16pm

As expected, George Zimmerman has been arrested and charged in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.  When Al Sharpton and the No Justice, No Peace Hallelujah Chorus demand a scalp, rare indeed is the politician whose spine is so stiff that he dares not deliver one. 

It appears that in filing the second-degree murder charge, special prosecutor Angela Corey hopes to pressure Zimmerman into taking a plea to some lesser charge, such as manslaughter.  But I stand by my earlier prediction that, unless some new facts emerge, Zimmerman will not be convicted of any crime. 

And then what? The mob has been appeased, if only for now.

Comments:


Wylee Coyote
Joined
Jul '10
Wylee Coyote

10 cents:

  1. How do you regain control over a situation that has gotten out of control?
  2. Do you take the beating and hope for the best?
  3. Do you use the gun because in the heat of the moment you believe your life depends on it?

A police trainer once taught me that as long as the phrase "beaten to death" exists, there will be situations where you should use deadly force on an unarmed suspect.

As for the prosecutor's decision, I'm not eager to second-guess her, as she is one of the only people in this whole sorry situation who actually has access to all the facts.

Fake John Galt
Joined
Jul '11
Fake John Galt

I suspect that there will enough evidence to convict Zimmerman and little to none to exonerate him. Evidence is being found and lost as we speak.

Maggie Somavilla
Joined
Sep '11
Maggie Somavilla

Maybe I just haven't been paying attention, but what happened to the early talk of a witness who saw the two on the ground, the one in the red shirt on the bottom yelling for help? That would have coincided with the voice on the 911 call from a neighbor? Now all I hear is "unless a witness comes forward..."

James Gawron
Joined
Dec '10
James Gawron
Fake John Galt: I suspect that there will enough evidence to convict Zimmerman and little to none to exonerate him. Evidence is being found and lost as we speak. · 2 hours ago

FJG,

Yes, a perfectly legal quota based affirmative lynching.  The PC prosecutor might grow a spine but how likely is that?

Regards,

Jim

Robert E. Lee
Joined
Jun '10
Robert E. Lee

Doesn't the fact that Zimmerman has now been charged make him liable to face a civil suit?  Whether found guilty or not, the best "justice" for the Martin family seems to be to make sure that they can sue the life out of Zimmerman regardless of the truth.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy
Wylee Coyote  As for the prosecutor's decision, I'm not eager to second-guess her, as she is one of the only people in this whole sorry situation who actually has access to all the facts. 

Agreed. We cannot ignore the simple possibility that the guy might be guilty.

I still wish they'd sent it to a Grand Jury first, so that facts of the case could come out in a controlled legal setting without the stigma for Zimmerman of being charged with a crime.

The State had to do something, to ensure that the facts of the case get a proper, public examination, to get the true witnesses under oath, and to help put a stop to false witnesses talking to the press.

CoolHand
Joined
Dec '10
CoolHand
Jack Dunphy: In response to 10 cents' question, if I'm involved in an altercation and the suspect attempts ro pull my gun from my holster, my only assumption has to be that he intends to shoot me with it. If he manages to get the gun out, it becomes a contest to see who can control the gun and then use it for its designed purpose.

Agreed.

Once they started wrestling over the gun, the outcome was set: one of them was going to get shot.

The wrestling match was just to decide who it was going to be.

Robert E. Lee
Joined
Jun '10
Robert E. Lee

Misthiocracy

The State had to do something, ...

No it didn't.  Local government was handling it.  The state was meddling, playing to the crowd for political reasons.

Jack Dunphy

Mendel: Mr. Dunphy, you have written here several times that you do not believe "Zimmerman will ever be convicted of any crime" related to this case.  Is this because you believe that Zimmerman acted in self-defense and was justified in his shooting, or because you believe the evidence will always be insufficient to convict regardless of what actually happened?

I ask because I have been appalled at the eagerness of both sides of the commentariat to jump to a verdict based on such sparse evidence.  As a police officer, do you find the public evidence a) sufficient and b) trustworthy enough to reach a conclusion on Zimmerman's innocence or guilt?  I, admitedly an imbecile in these matters, certainly do not. · 7 hours ago

Edited 6 hours ago

What I've learned in the press so far is that Zimmerman claims he was attacked by Martin, and that the only known eye witness corroborates that account, at least to some extent.  Unless something is produced that conclusively contradicts Zimmerman and the witness, there's your reasonable doubt.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In