Cal Lawton · December 20, 2012 at 4:16pm

Lunch is usually a sandwich standing at the kitchen sink, or a coffee and Payday bar behind the steering wheel. Today, I decided stop for lunch at the counter in a local Denny's.

CNN was on the set next to the register, and the gal at the anchor desk was smirking over something Speaker Boehner had just said in his two-second remarks before the press.

A waitress to my right asked, "What's a physical cliff?"

My personality type lets me talk to anyone about anything. What a great opportunity to spread some conservative fact to a stranger. Today, though, I held my tongue and stuffed my mouth with seasoned fries. I immediately realized that if this woman, citizen, tax payer, and constituent didn't already know and understand the significance of the fiscal disaster facing the nation, it didn't matter.

Any suggestion I could make about the waitress's news consumption habits would be a crude and ridiculous assumption. She could watch the major news broadcasters regularly for all I know. Maybe that's my point.

Comments:



Joined
Jun '12
Lorne Russell

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter"  Winston Churchill


Joined
Dec '11
Ralph Baskett

In my judgment the best response would be,

“President Obama intends to raise taxes on your boss.  Were you hoping for a raise next year?”


Joined
Feb '11
Hang On

And from your reactions you wonder why Republicans lose?

Western Chauvinist
Joined
Dec '10
Western Chauvinist

I would have been tempted to explain that "the fiscal cliff is what we're about to go over now that we've re-elected President Obama," and then hand her a $10 tip, while telling her to spend it now, because next year it won't buy her $2.50 worth of this year's merchandise.

Either that or tell her that the "physical cliff" is caused by Obamacare, and she'll know she's fallen off it when she has to schedule her free annual physical two years in advance.

SParker
Joined
Jul '12
SParker

Yeah, but when it comes to inane arguments over physical cliffs I have my lemmings.   When the well-informed are engaged in silly arguments, my heart is with the ignorant.  As long as they keep they keep the coffee coming.

I suspect if you'd explained it she might have said something like "how foolish."   Sort of like a friend's wise comment after getting the low-down from me on Steve Forbes for President (2000 version):  "oh he'll never get elected.  He makes too much sense."

(Re: Paules.  "Every single person."   Really?  Oh.  Come. On.  Funny, though.)


Joined
Mar '12
Donald Todd

An Obama voter outed by herself.  Impressive!  Most impressive!!

Joseph Stanko
Joined
Jun '10
Joseph Stanko

~Paules

Barkha Herman: To be fair, the reality is that there was never and will never be a an informed and engaged electorate.  You may tell me that every one in early United States knew all about the issues of the time but I will find it hard to believe. · 27 minutes ago

Everyone understood the issues at stake in the election of 1860.  Every single person.  And again in 1864.  Nobody was voting for bromides like "hope and change." · 2 hours ago

I'm with Barkha, I find that hard to believe.

In any case in the Founders' era the waitress in question would not have been eligible to vote, so it's an apples-to-oranges comparison.

The Founding Fathers did not much trust democracy, that's why only one half of one branch of the Federal government (i.e. the House) was directly elected by the people.

Edited on December 20, 2012 at 8:45pm
BlueAnt
Joined
Aug '10
BlueAnt

Joseph Stanko

The Founding Fathers did not much trust democracy, that's why only one half of one branch of the Federal government (i.e. the House) was directly elected by the people.

Which is why I usually lead off with "repeal the 17th Amendment" when asked what quick fixes I would make to our current political system.

It's a lonely crusade against one of the lesser known evils of the Progressive movement.  But I like to think I earn nerd points for obscure arguments.


Joined
Aug '10
Ansonia

Cal, the waitress actually asked you this question? Why would you pass up an opportunity to tell someone something it's in your interest to have her know? (By the way, while I know it isn't "physical cliff ", I have no idea what the fiscal cliff is either. I'll read about it on about.com before I head off to my housekeeping job in the morning.)

Edited on December 21, 2012 at 4:26am
Cal Lawton
Joined
May '10
Cal Lawton

Ansonia: Cal, the waitress actually asked you this question? Why would you pass up an opportunity to tell someone something it's in your interest to have her know? (By the way, while I know it isn't "physical cliff ", I have no idea what the fiscal cliff is either. I'll read about it on about.com before I head off to my housekeeping job in the morning.) · 1 hour ago

Edited 28 minutes ago

Nice try, but you lose. Thanks for playing!


Joined
Aug '10
Ansonia

I'm only half kidding. Jonah Goldberg and Glenn Reynolds (12/14/12 : More Thinking Like This Please) are right. With a certain famous story about Churchill in mind, before Monday I'm giving a subscription of Verily to a kind and beautiful young Hispanic woman I know who works at a gas station while raising six kids.

Edited on December 21, 2012 at 10:29pm
Miffed White Male
Joined
Mar '11
Jeff Richter
Barkha Herman: To be fair, the reality is that there was never and will never be a an informed and engaged electorate.  You may tell me that every one in early United States knew all about the issues of the time but I will find it hard to believe. · 22 hours ago

Which is why we need to stop encouraging "everyone" to vote and making it easy with early voting and no-cause absentee voting. 

Voting should require enough interest on the part of the voter to be willing to put a minimal amount of effort into it.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover
cliff

And that, Normie, is the truth !

RedRules
Joined
Feb '12
RedRules

Yep. I am continually shocked at how utterly clueless so many of my fellow VOTING citizens are. No wonder Dems want even MORE people to vote.


Joined
Aug '10
Ansonia

Re comment # 34True. I'm only saying a well informed person should--at the very least--kindly answer politely asked questions. You more knowledgable people should judge less and teach more.
Certainly it's evil we've all been brainwashed to believe we have an obligation to vote no matter how uninformed we are.

Edited on December 23, 2012 at 3:30pm

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In